Native Java 8 (one line)

With Java 8, int[] can be converted to Integer[] easily:

int[] data = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};

// To boxed array
Integer[] what = Arrays.stream( data ).boxed().toArray( Integer[]::new );
Integer[] ever = IntStream.of( data ).boxed().toArray( Integer[]::new );

// To boxed list
List<Integer> you  = Arrays.stream( data ).boxed().collect( Collectors.toList() );
List<Integer> like = IntStream.of( data ).boxed().collect( Collectors.toList() );

As others stated, Integer[] is usually not a good map key. But as far as conversion goes, we now have a relatively clean and native code.

You can use Stream APIs of Java 8

int[] intArray = Arrays.stream(array).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();

Start with a result of 0. Loop through all elements of your int array. Multiply the result by 10, then add in the current number from the array. At the end of the loop, you have your result.

• Result: 0
• Loop 1: Result * 10 => 0, Result + 1 => 1
• Loop 2: Result * 10 => 10, Result + 2 => 12
• Loop 3: Result * 10 >= 120, Result + 3 => 123

This can be generalized for any base by changing the base from 10 (here) to something else, such as 16 for hexadecimal.

With streams added in Java 8 we can write code like:

int[] example1 = list.stream().mapToInt(i->i).toArray();
// OR
int[] example2 = list.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();

Thought process:

• The simple Stream#toArray returns an Object[] array, so it is not what we want. Also, Stream#toArray(IntFunction<A[]> generator) which returns A[] doesn't do what we want, because the generic type A can't represent the primitive type int

• So it would be nice to have some kind of stream which would be designed to handle primitive type int instead of the reference type like Integer, because its toArray method will most likely also return an int[] array (returning something else like Object[] or even boxed Integer[] would be unnatural for int). And fortunately Java 8 has such a stream which is IntStream

• So now the only thing we need to figure out is how to convert our Stream<Integer> (which will be returned from list.stream()) to that shiny IntStream.

  Quick searching in documentation of Stream while looking for methods which return IntStream points us to our solution which is mapToInt(ToIntFunction<? super T> mapper) method. All we need to do is provide a mapping from Integer to int.

  Since ToIntFunction is functional interface we can also provide its instance via lambda or method reference.

  Anyway to convert Integer to int we can use Integer#intValue so inside mapToInt we can write:

  mapToInt( (Integer i) -> i.intValue() )
  

  (or some may prefer: mapToInt(Integer::intValue).)

  But similar code can be generated using unboxing, since the compiler knows that the result of this lambda must be of type int (the lambda used in mapToInt is an implementation of the ToIntFunction interface which expects as body a method of type: int applyAsInt(T value) which is expected to return an int).

  So we can simply write:

  mapToInt((Integer i)->i)
  

  Also, since the Integer type in (Integer i) can be inferred by the compiler because List<Integer>#stream() returns a Stream<Integer>, we can also skip it which leaves us with

  mapToInt(i -> i)
  

You can convert entire string and then you get the toCharArray method separately characters in an array

Scanner t = new Scanner(System.in);
     int x = t.nextInt();
     char[] xd = String.valueOf(x).toCharArray();

    for (int i = 0; i < xd.length; i++) {
        System.out.println(xd[i]);
    }

Another way of doing this would be:

int test = 12345;
        int[] testArray = new int[String.valueOf(test).length()];

And then looping over it.

The immediate problem is due to you using <= temp.length() instead of < temp.length(). However, you can achieve this a lot more simply. Even if you use the string approach, you can use:

String temp = Integer.toString(guess);
int[] newGuess = new int[temp.length()];
for (int i = 0; i < temp.length(); i++)
{
    newGuess[i] = temp.charAt(i) - '0';
}

You need to make the same change to use < newGuess.length() when printing out the content too - otherwise for an array of length 4 (which has valid indexes 0, 1, 2, 3) you'll try to use newGuess[4]. The vast majority of for loops I write use < in the condition, rather than <=.