I chose Tumbleweed because I'd heard the Plasma experience was very good (it is). I stayed because it's a rolling release, but with snapshots so you always have a way to get a working machine even when an update breaks something. I thought I'd enjoy Yast more than I do- it often seems to be duplicating features offered by the DE, which can be very confusing. Answer from sound-man-rob on reddit.com
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › why use (and avoid) opensuse? leave your feedback!
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Why Use (and avoid) openSUSE? Leave your feedback!
March 8, 2022 -

As a new linux user (1 year), seeing all the distros out there is very overwhelming and it's hard to grasp the true nature of a distro based only on short term reviews that miss a lot of the important details. So what better thing than to ask it's users the reasons behind them using it.

Write everything that comes to mind for why you chose, use and recommend openSUSE. What makes it special? And what things do you dislike?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r › openSUSE
openSUSE: Linux for open minds
January 25, 2010 - r/openSUSE: openSUSE is a Linux-based, open, free and secure operating system for PC, laptops, servers and ARM devices.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › why do you guys use opensuse? what made you start?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Why do you guys use OpenSUSE? What made you start?
July 22, 2024 - 52 votes, 97 comments. 49K subscribers in the openSUSE community. openSUSE is a Linux-based, open, free and secure operating system for PC, laptops
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › should i try opensuse
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Should i try OpenSuse
June 26, 2023 -

Hello guys, i am thinking about switching to Suse but i am wonderin what can suse give me that fedora cant. I have heard yast is a great tool, Suse is better with kernel modules (oracle virtualbox) and Tumbleweed is not that bleeding edge as Fedora (thats a good point for me).

I am using my system dual booted with Win 11 for a few reasons and installer of OpenSuse seems a lil confusing.

I have a decent modern laptop with a i5 1135G7 and no dedicated GPU, i am worried about wifi and sound drivers too. For the ones who could check my laptop is Acer A315 58 516F. Only driver issue i experienced is with debian for my sound drivers.

Top answer
1 of 5
11
Tumbleweed is rolling release. It means you don't need to wory about huge upgrade from version to version. You always are on the newest version. openSUSE provides openQA and snapshots to reduce issues with updates. It makes it more reliable then other distros, but Tumbleweed should be considered more bleeding edge then Fedora. The main selling points of openSUSE / Tumbleweed for me: btrfs with snapshots, allowing for quick recovery after buggy update or misconfiguration; YaST, being a great tool to do some administrative task that are not very intuitive in console; opi for searching and installing stuff from OBS, which is a collection of repositories from SUSE and users providing lots of additional software; reliable rolling release, for me having access to newest kernel and Mesa for gaming without worrying about stability of my system is a godsend. openSUSE installer allows for way more configuration in the installer then most other distros. The drawback is that it can get confusing for less tech savvy users. In my experience the default values are usually selected correctly, even accounting the dual boot. But i would recommend to go through guided setup when partitioning and making sure your Windows partitions are set to "Shrink if necessary". Also, to add to previous point: It is recommended to use Windows or its tools to shrink partitions beforehand. While Linux tools should work, it is considered safer to use built in tools if possible.
2 of 5
7
Should probably ask this on the Fedora sub as well, just to be on the safe side
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › opensuse is great for people that understand linux, but is it really for everyone?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: openSUSE is Great for People That Understand Linux, But is it Really for Everyone?
August 29, 2021 -

Let me preface this by saying I am very much new to openSUSE and it's community. I thought I might offer some insight as an outsider, and try to get some feedback to understand the direction of the project as a whole. I'm a Linux user of about 17 years. I have been running Linux full time on my personal hardware for about half that, aside from the occasional Windows game / application which runs in a VM with GPU pass-through these days.

I'm not strictly against proprietary software, but support / promote open-source and free (as in speech) software/solutions as much as I can to my clients, friends, family, etc. In my opinion things like proprietary codecs, video drivers, and other software are a necessary evil with the current state of Linux. To me, being able to own your data and the tools to easily manage it takes priority over being able to modify those tools. Of course there's something to be said for security and piece of mind when using free (as in speech) tools in your workflow.

The position I constantly find myself in is the distribution and software choices I make as an advanced user, is not something I feel I can recommend to those that seek advice from me most of time. I've been running Arch on the desktop almost exclusively for the last 5 years. However, I find myself recommending Ubuntu or Pop!_OS for most newcomers, but spend very little time dealing with these distributions first hand. I am, 99% of the time, working with Arch, CentOS, and RHEL.

So this leaves me in a position, where I know very little about the solutions I'm recommending. When these people who look up to me, inevitably have problems, I often find myself wasting a lot of time researching the quirks of these particular platforms. I had a friend upset with me over this last month. She asked me if I'm not willing to use it myself, then why did I ever recommend it to her? I couldn't come up with a good answer for that, and it is really starting to bother me.

With Red Hat killing off CentOS, and what I believe to be a loss of community focus with the IBM acquisition, I've found myself seeking other options. I know many are moving to community driven projects like AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux. However, I can't help but feel a little jaded about the position Red Hat has put me in by cutting 9 years off the lifespan of the thousands of CentOS deployments I'm responsible for, seemingly overnight. I'm not sure I can, in good faith, stay within the Red Hat ecosystem.

This has led me to openSUSE and SLE. I greatly appreciate the efforts SUSE has made in this space. Bringing the Leap code base so close to SLE. SUSE is actually giving back to the community in exchange for the upstream community contributions. Red Hat seems to be taking advantage of the community in the form of CentOS Stream, but It's a one-way street, with the stable product behind a pay-wall.

Please understand, I'm not trying to bash the openSUSE project with what I'm about to say. Overall, I love openSUSE and see great potential, I'm just not exactly sure where all of this leaves me in my search for a new home. I'm hoping we can have a productive conversation around this. I'm open to any and all feedback / recommendations. I'm very interested to see where others fall on this topic.

I love the fact that I have found a family of products I'm willing to use on my own hardware (Tumbleweed), and on the server (Leap and SLE). But there is still one thing nagging at me. I can't bring myself to recommend it for novice users. In my view there seems to be little polish out of the box, especially as a GNOME user who finds vanilla GNOME to be practically unusable. My understanding is KDE's the flagship desktop, but even then, I feel lacks a lot of polish. The direction of the project seems to be focused on the server, with little attention given to the desktop.

As a power user I've found so many things with stock openSUSE that annoy the hell out of me. Most of these things can be solved fairly easily, but man does it wear on me. The installer, while powerful, is slowest and clunkiest process I've ever seen in a modern distribution. High DPI is flat out broken on the installer and welcome app. Application availability is kind of a problem. I've been able to work around this mostly with OBS, but not everything is there, and using a website to pull down apps seems like a step backwards. OPI works well, but man is it slow compared to other tools like yay on Arch. I find Zypper to be slow, although a tuned DNF gets me to a comfortable spot. There's just such a long list I don't want to get into right now.

To summarize I think openSUSE is a fantastic distribution for those who know what they want, and how to make it work. I just find myself in a position where, because of what I view as shortcomings of the distribution, I can't recommend it to everyone. From my limited time in the openSUSE forums and reddit, the desktop user experience doesn't seem to be a real focus of the project.

Top answer
1 of 22
22
Tumbleweed for a new user is perhaps not the best choice, perhaps Leap is better. I can't tell you in general if openSUSE is suitable for a beginner, any system that is new at the beginning is complicated. When I started using the PC, XP seemed really complicated, I think too often people forget the first few times, regardless of the system. A pc is something complicated, so even the simplest system always seems complicated the first few times. So it really depends on people's willingness to understand how it works. However I don't think Ubuntu is simpler, openSUSE allows you to easily restore the system in case you do any damage, Ubuntu isn't and this makes openSUSE certainly more reassuring.
2 of 22
13
I do believe Ubuntu is better for someone new to Linux, not much because of usability but instead bc of its large community (askubuntu is really useful). Even better that Ubuntu, ZorinOS. Version 16 is just amazing at explaining things for someone new to Linux, even going as far as recommending alternative open source apps when someone tries to run a popular .exe file. They also provide the option to install it through wine and that's easy too (just one click). To top it off they have snapd and flatpak enabled by support. The flathub repository is added as well (that's better than what elementary does). A new user doesn't care about snap vs flatpak, they just want apps and that's smth that Linux Mint doesn't understand. The only problem I used to have with openSUSE was the packagekit thing that would run in the background impeding me to run YAST. But that is gone now. I think that If someone has enough knowledge about tech to run Fedora or any equivalent distro they will be able to run openSUSE or SUSE. And by that I'm just referring about people that have the will to get to know and use Linux like they did with Windows/MacOS in the past, not people that just want the browser working and keep on with their lifes without feeling any changes in their computers. I'm not going to address the Gnome thing bc that's is a matter of taste. I love vanilla Gnome and think it is perfect for me.
Top answer
1 of 34
98
Yes. OpenSUSE is one of the oldest distributions out there that even predates Red Hat. Back in the early days SUSE were considered the only project which had a solid KDE implementation, even to this day. As for why I believe OpenSUSE is great for daily driving: Tumbleweed always receives the latest packages from upstream development. This means that the distribution is guaranteed to work on the latest hardware and benefit from patches for optimal performance. As an example, Tumbleweed gained the optional x86-64-v3 packages while Arch, Fedora still lack these optimizations. On top of that, it also outperformed other distributions including Arch in various benchmarks. Btrfs with Snapper can be utilized so the system can be rolled back to a working snapshot in case an update breaks anything. Which leads on the further point... Packages are tested through OpenQA before they are distributed, ensuring that updates are stable, and if they pass the extensive QA, it ships automatically. So in most cases, OpenSUSE often gets the latest versions of software hours to days after upstream publishes those changes. On Arch, it took over a month for the maintainer to update GNOME 44. OBS - The Open Build System which is similar to the AUR allows anyone to create and publish packages not found in the official repositories or packman. IMO this is a better approach to COPR or the AUR as they still go through openQA to detect problems with compilation. OpenSUSE is desktop environment agnostic. GNOME, KDE, XFCE, Cinnamon etc are all a priority and receive the same level of development. Other distros have been known to have weird quirky behaviors on certain DEs that doesn't seem to be an issue here. Zypper is probably the most cohesive feature packed package manager out there. It can seamlessly change vendors to a different package source to avoid dependency/system breakages, provides solutions on conflicting packages and much more. OpenSUSE combats software problems in smarter ways than other distributions. They have extensive backports for almost everything from the kernel,X11,firmware,KDE etc all of which is provided officially and not from third party developers like Ubuntu PPAs. This way, the software installed from SUSE directly can be trusted. YaST is an amazing system configuration tool that allows you to administer the installation with a breeze. IMO this is one of the greatest selling points to this distro, and it never disappoints. Security - OpenSUSE is more hardened by default than Arch/Fedora/Ubuntu, meaning it can be trusted and dependent on. If you value security highly, it remains of the best options for security conscious individuals. All in all, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed/MicroOS are the best distributions available in my biased opinion. Combine this with the long track record of SUSE making solid distros, it simply cannot be beaten for desktop use.
2 of 34
16
Why wouldn't it be? openSUSE seems like one of the most reliable options.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r › openSUSE_Slowroll
r/openSUSE_Slowroll
January 24, 2024 - Hi. Last week I was comparing versions of some development packages of opensuse Leap, Slowroll and Fedora 44.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › why is opensuse so overlooked?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Why is openSUSE so overlooked?
December 3, 2023 -

Hi guys so what's your opinion? Why is such a solid distro so overlooked?

I have switched from endeavouros 2 years ago and I am absolutely in love with opensuse tumbleweed.

Rolling, stable, bleeding edge, yast, works like a charm, opi, lots of tools and perks, amazing KDE implementation, works for both personal and private use as well.

But somehow opensuse doesn't get the attention it should. Why is that?

Top answer
1 of 34
32
OpenSuSe was my first distro 15-ish years ago. I was new to Linux, and YaST was amazing after moving from Windows. That said, the system felt slower than Debian or Fedora. YaST is helpful and required to play nicely within its own rules. I often managed to "brick" my PC after installing Nvidia drivers or disabling sound with GStreamer. I plan to return to openSuSe shortly after years of pice with Debian, so I will share my point here: Rolling release is scary. I know something will be broken when I update Debian between new versions ( for example, from 11 to 12 ), so I can plan some downtime. OpenSuse is a Greman/EU distro, and I noticed that in the US or Japan, software from this part of the globe has a much harder time expanding than something native. SuSe and RedHat are profecinal distros. Marketing is king, and RedHat managed to create Fedora as a Distro for "users". At the time when I was using openSuse, the company was owned and managed by Novel. A few years later, it switched heads left and right, neglecting proper marketing. Arch users haven't discovered yet that you can have a rolling release without breaking your bootloader ;-)
2 of 34
31
OpenSUSE's installer is still the best in its class. Especially when you setup complex partitioning like a combination of RAID, LVM, and even bcache. All these are possible and intuitive with the YaST partitioner. The only issue I have is network printer and scanner. YaST gets in the way when it comes to detecting network printers and scanners. In most systems, it's just a cups-browsed and avahi-daemon. In openSUSE, you won't discover any printer or add them via usual printer management due to permissions. You are forced to use the very non intuitive printer setup of YaST that is the only permitted app to add printers.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linux › opensuse is brilliantly engineered (an appreciation post)
openSUSE is brilliantly engineered (an appreciation post) : r/linux
September 5, 2022 - I've started using it in my VMs and I really like it. It's come a long ways since I first tried it in the early 2000s. I don't think I'll put it on my PC over Gentoo but as I'm sure you're aware, building from source isn't great in a VM. OpenSuse is fantastic.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › t › opensuse
Best OpenSUSE Posts - Reddit
Find the best posts and communities about OpenSUSE on Reddit
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › honestly, what do other distros do better than opensuse?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Honestly, what do other distros do better than OpenSUSE?
October 21, 2021 -

Im a sysadmin who has been using OpenSUSE for about 2 years now. I love it. All of my personal workstations and servers are running it.

But the whole reason I picked it initially was because I really like BTRFS and their website says it’s great for Sysadmin.

It’s the only workstation distro I’ve ever used so I guess I I’ve been thinking about trying a new distro but I’m honestly failing to see why I would when OpenSUSE offers so much customization.

What makes OpenSUSE so Sysadmin friendly? Why would someone choose something other than OpenSUSE? Surely there must be a reason, right?

Top answer
1 of 21
30
as a sysadmin, to me, it feels like SUSE/OpenSUSE is "by engineers for engineers"
2 of 21
24
Couple reasons: Tumbleweed has the disadvantages that come with rolling release; i.e., proprietary stuff like Nvidia and Steam break sometimes. Yes you can roll back, but it's easier not to worry about it. Leap is too slow even compared to other LTS distros. Frankly Tumbleweed can be an absurd amount of downloading even aside from compatibility issues. I've had more issues with packaging quality than other distros. I remember trying to run gnome-boxes and it missing dependencies so it would segfault every time I'd try to launch a VM. Steam was missing an OpenAL library I needed to launch some games in it's dependency list. Also Tumbleweed having to dup and dup installing recommended packages for patterns is annoying because either I have stuff getting reinstalled, or I have to lock it and have Zypper complain about it every time. YaST is confusing sometimes. For example, what good is it to have a GUI to set up sudo when I still have to visudo to turn off the targetpw default (which is a bizarre default). Switching display managers or auto login? Hiding in the "/etc/sysconfig editor" instead of in the services tab because there's a single service unit that reads a config file instead. Besides, the tools included with DEs cover a lot of that territory now. Not that other distros really do that "better" but it's not always as great it's hyped up to be. The impression I get is that Packman is much sketchier than RPMFusion or Debian's non-free repo. May but be true but there's a lot more "if you use anything other than our defaults you might blow up your system and it will be your fault" surrounding it. So I could see someone choosing a different distro just to get codecs safely if they didn't know better. I'm not trying to say it's bad, there's a lot of really cool stuff OpenSUSE does as well. But those are my experiences with things I found jarring or frustrating with using OpenSUSE.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › things to know before switching to opensuse?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Things to know before switching to OpenSuse?
July 4, 2022 -

Hello guys, I'm planning to try a rolling release and I'm thinking about trying Opensuse. Currently using Linux MX.

What are the main differences between Suse and a debian based?

What things some people new to suse may not like?

Any other tip or info is also appreciated, thanks.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › why isn't opensuse more popular?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: Why isn't openSUSE more popular?
July 25, 2024 -

I have distro-hopped a lot and have used the following distros as my daily driver for at least a month: Ubuntu, Mint, Manjaro, Fedora, Silverblue, Bluefin, Debian, Pop!_OS, and LMDE. I still think openSUSE Tumbleweed is the winner. It's stable, modern, doesn't crash on updates, and has good tools. When I see polls, I'm surprised to see so few people use it. Additionally, the openSUSE subreddit is smaller than most other distro subreddits.

I must admit, the openSUSE branding does look a bit dated. Could that be the reason?

Top answer
1 of 40
126
There are problems with openSUSE that no one wants to talk about. Codecs should be more straightforward to get, like Ubuntu. The installation medium should be the same as the "LiveCD". No one will download a live medium for testing and then another DVD for installing. They should ship main ISO files that can be used for installation AND testing, like Ubuntu, Fedora and everyone else does. Needs to work more on marketing and the features of the distribution. That's quite absent from their homepage if you tell me; the user can't figure out what makes this distribution unique compared to others, so it's just left to statistical probability and luck that new users figure it out from blogs and other sources. There are some hardware problems with openSUSE. e.g. my Bluetooth keyboard sucks hard when I try to plug it with Tumbleweed despite it working well on EVERY single Linux distribution out there. I have read many forum posts on other hardware issues. Maybe these could be part of the reason...
2 of 40
25
TLDR: I think the preconceived "strong points" of the other distro's (Debian - Stability | Arch - Bleeding edge, etc.) makes openSUSE move back in the queue. Not because it's bad/worse, it does all of it well, but none of it is its "standout feature" like on the other distro's. Post: So I've thought about this, as I have been wondering the same, so take this with a pinch of salt as it's only my opinion. Firstly, I don't think it's the branding as EVERYONE loves the Chameleon/Gecko ;) However, I cannot give you a "proper" answer. I think the reason is, that there is no "standout-feature"/"nothing flashy" (loose term) about it. It's plain, but powerful (once you use it). What do I mean by this? Debian - The KING of stability. Ubuntu - Is THE beginner distro; however with Canonical pushing telemetry/snaps, Linux Mint is now imo, being pushed as "the starter" distro. Fedora - I regard this as an "first intermediate user" distro. I can see Ubuntu/Mint users progressing to this as it has a similar release cadence and DE as Ubuntu, however the applications are newer which might be attractive to some people looking to move on from Ubuntu but want something "similar" (loose term). Redhat/IBM may have damaged the reputation a bit with the whole CentOS Stream saga. Arch/Gentoo/Nix, even Void - This is obviously the "advanced users" distro's. I also think the whole meme of "I run [distro], btw" was extended into these ("advanced distro") communities and I believe this a reason (along with bleeding edge software) makes these popular choices. Pop!_OS, Bazzite, Garuda, Nobara, etc. - They all use the "setup/ready for gaming" as a main way to attract new users (main category for new users) Which leaves openSUSE. IMO, it does all of this WELL. The problem is, none of it is, its' `standout feature`, which I think, makes people overlook it. Want stability? Debian Bleeding edge? Arch Gaming? Pop!_OS or Nobara Want all of it? openSUSE (imo), but no one says this. I also think part of this problem is HOW people online ask their questions. For example, if someone wants/asks for "stability" the majority of answers is going to be Debian, maybe even Ubuntu, not openSUSE. Same result for the other "categories". Hopefully that "answers" your question. Edit: Grammar Edit #2: Added TLDR.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linux › opensuse gains momentum: a look at its growing popularity
r/linux on Reddit: openSUSE Gains Momentum: A Look at its Growing Popularity
March 25, 2023 - So which you choose is generally chosen for you by your distro unless you plan to set it up yourself (which you probably need to do for arch and arch-based distros). When given the choice, as is the case in OpenSUSE, I choose SELinux because it's at least a little more secure and I've never found myself needing to tweak it.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › what made you use opensuse?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: What made you use openSUSE?
February 26, 2026 - 65 votes, 65 comments. 47K subscribers in the openSUSE community. openSUSE is a Linux-based, open, free and secure operating system for PC, laptops
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › what brought you to opensuse?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: What brought you to opensuse?
June 12, 2022 -

I was a user using ubuntu-based distros but i learnt about opensuse 5 years ago. I decided to check it out and got attracted by tumbleweed. Continued to use kubuntu until the whole snap debacle a few months ago and also got annoyed by sometimes it wouldn't even load. Decided to try many distros. None, not even fedora (I have it on a seperate partition), appealed to me. I decided to try opensuse tumbleweed and haven't looked back.

I like how it is stable yet current.

What brought you to opensuse?

Top answer
1 of 37
16

Oh, its easy. When I did distro-hopping I was trying to find distro which just works with less issues for all of my needs. OpenSUSE was the only distro that:

  • did not have tearing issue oob

  • handled Bluetooth headphones correctly

  • KDE was noticeable faster and stable (tumbleweed)

  • Handled multi-monitor usage good enough

  • as a bonus: snapper, yast, firewall etc. oob

Yes, I know if it's working in one distro, you can make it work in another, but it was too much hassle for me. This post does not mean openSUSE is perfect, I surely had some issues. But definitely not more than in any other distro.

2 of 37
14

Long time Slackware user and early last year I wanted to get a new PC, but the newest Slackware stable version was about five years old at the time. I spent a few months testing out a bunch of distros in a VM to see which one felt the most comfortable and I eventually narrowed it down to Fedora and openSUSE.

I was leaning towards picking Fedora until I made a mistake in my openSUSE VM that caused it to boot to a black screen. I tried a few things and just figured I would reinstall, but when I rebooted I noticed an option in the Grub menu to boot into a snapshot (at the time I didn't realize it had that functionality). I chose a snapshot and it booted into the GUI like there had never been an issue. It was the fact that it was so easy for a clueless user (me) to get back to a working system, so the btrfs/zypper/snapper/grub integration was the deciding factor for me.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › what will be the future of opensuse after suse has asked not to use its name as a brand?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: What will be the future of OpenSuse after Suse has asked not to use its name as a brand?
September 3, 2024 -

I use Linux Mint. I would like to switch to OpenSuse (Leap or Tumbleweed), but I read that SUSE has officially asked openSUSE to stop using its name as a brand for the distribution, so OpenSuse will change its name and maybe it will not even be supported by Suse anymore. IMPORTANT: I am worried about having to install OpenSuse and then in 1 or 2 years have to uninstall it because it might not be possible to upgrade to the next version. We don't know if the operating system will undergo major changes when OpenSuse changes its name, so is there a risk that it might not be possible to upgrade to the next new version (the one with the new name)? I would not like to install OpenSuse now and then in 1 or 2 years have to install the new operating system.

  1. What will be the future of OpenSuse?

  2. If I install OpenSuse and after 1 or 2 years the new distribution without the name Suse comes out which will also be very different eventually, then I will not be able to switch to the new version because it would practically be a new different distribution? I am worried about having to install OpenSuse and then in 1 or 2 years have to uninstall it because it might not be possible to upgrade to the next version. We don't know if the operating system will undergo major changes when OpenSuse changes its name, so is there a risk that it might not be possible to upgrade to the next new version (the one with the new name)? I would not like to install OpenSuse now and then in 1 or 2 years have to install the new operating system.

  3. Should I install it now or should I wait?

  4. Will OpenSuse (or whatever it will be called in the future) still be supported by Suse?z

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linuxquestions › what is the purpose / advantage of opensuse?
r/linuxquestions on Reddit: What is the purpose / advantage of openSUSE?
April 13, 2022 -

I get why people install arch, debian, fedora, centos, ubuntu, gentoo, etc. I understand their philosophies and the type of distro they are, cutting edge / stable AF, etc. I can't figure out why someone would want to use openSUSE. I'm not trying to stir the pot. I'm legitamitly wanting to know what openSUSE is about, what its strengths and weaknesses are, and a meme level comment is ok if you are actually giving me useful info also.

Top answer
1 of 9
17
The SUSE folks are pretty smart. They do a lot of things better (especially on configuration side of the fence), so I recommend them. openSUSE is a community spin with SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) sync'd up underneath. So, for this, very stable. Btw, on the enterprise side, SLES is the most used enterprise distribution on high end equipment. There's also openSUSE Tumbleweed which (IMHO) is the best rolling distro out there. So, for this, cutting edge (but you know, the test harness used by openSUSE is so good, this has been remarkably stable for me). SUSE and openSUSE bring a lot of things to the table that are not found in other distributions. They use zypper for package oversight. They have YaST (which probably isn't as big of a deal as that once was). The openSUSE side favors KDE, and is one of the best KDE Plasma distros out there. I like their pam stack better than most. They are still friends with the Samba team (that was a dig at the Red Hat variants). They have the Open Build Service, which people can leverage to port things into SUSE/openSUSE,+ (without you having to maintain your own build environments). So, for me, openSUSE is where I start.... and I have to weigh why I would need to use a different distro. Mind you, there are some cases. But certainly give it a try.
2 of 9
5
openSUSE Tumbleweed is rolling release snapshot on updates has YaST to configure the system kde some security defaults are stronger than other distros openSUSE Leap upgrades smoothly extremely stable YaST configuration
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/linux › why doesn't opensuse get more love?
r/linux on Reddit: Why doesn't openSUSE get more love?
March 10, 2025 -

I don't see it recommended on reddit very often and I just want to understand why. Is it because reddit is more USA-centric and it's a German company?

With Tumbleweed and Leap, there's options for those who prefer more bleeding edge vs more stability. Plus there's excellent integration for both KDE and GNOME.

For what it's worth I've only used Tumbleweed KDE since switching to Linux about six months ago and have only needed to use terminal twice. Before that I was a windows user for my whole life.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/opensuse › opensuse for beginners?
r/openSUSE on Reddit: openSUSE for beginners?
May 6, 2025 -

This is going to be my first time using Linux for daily use. I don't use my laptop for much—mostly watching movies, TV shows, and some YouTube. For software, I mainly use Word and Excel, and I don’t really do any photo or video editing.

One thing I really enjoy is customizing my desktop to make it look cool.

About a year ago, I installed Fedora on my old laptop before selling it. I didn’t use it much back then—just installed a couple of programs and used it mainly for downloading TV shows, movies, and anime.

So, would it be a good idea to start using openSUSE now?