🌐
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Google Antigravity vs. Cursor: 3 Features That Changed My Workflow - YouTube
Google Antigravity just released, and it might change how we code forever.In this video, I walk you through exactly how to set up Google Antigravity on your ...
Published   November 22, 2025
Discussions

I tried Google's new Antigravity IDE so you don't have to (vs Cursor/Windsurf)
The multi-agent orchestration is a nice UI, but like you say, it just makes it easier to do lazy vibe-coding. I also find that Gemini 3.0 is way more aggressive at doing stuff you probably don’t want. I started it in the wrong directory yesterday, and rather than stopping and telling me it didn’t have permissions, it was writing shell scripts to try and edit folders it didn’t have access to via normal tools! Very scary. For me, CLI tools are the sweet spot - make it write a design doc you give feedback on first. Let it run in yolo mode, but review the PR on GitHub just like you would with a junior dev. I also never like letting any agent touch git commands aside from log and diff - takes an extra 30 seconds to write commit messages but I don’t have to worry about it doing a bad rebase or force push, which is basically the only way it can seriously screw up more than an hour’s worth of work. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/ChatGPTCoding
196
304
November 21, 2025
Google Antigravity is a cursor clone
So far MacOS first impressions = not great. Been stuck here, even after a restart + re-authentication. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/LocalLLaMA
167
400
November 19, 2025
Antigravity or Cursor, which one would you recommend?
all are same. forks of vscode More on reddit.com
🌐 r/vibecoding
34
4
1 month ago
Google Antigravity is better
It's such a buggy mess and code completion is nowhere near cursor tab, which aspects made you think that? More on reddit.com
🌐 r/cursor
14
0
November 18, 2025
People also ask

Should I use Cursor, Antigravity, or both?
Use Cursor if you need a robust professional editor. Use Antigravity if you're budget-conscious or experimenting. Use both if you want multiple AI perspectives and maximum flexibility.
🌐
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Does workflow with tools like Cursor evolve over time?
Yes. Most users spend months discovering features and optimizing their workflow. The true value of Cursor, for example, often emerges after exploring features like inline edits and Composer mode.
🌐
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Is Cursor worth the $240/year?
For many professional developers, yes—time saved often outweighs the cost. For students or hobbyists, Antigravity may offer sufficient value for free. The ROI depends heavily on your workflow and income.
🌐
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
🌐
Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which AI-Agent Editor Is Best for You?
November 21, 2025 - Its Agent Manager view, artifact generation, and browser recording make it far more than just an AI-powered editor. If you prefer speed, parallelism, and a VS-Code–like experience, Cursor 2.0 is likely a better fit.
🌐
CometAPI
cometapi.com › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-2-0
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which IDE should you choose in 2025? - CometAPI - All AI Models in One API
3 weeks ago - Cursor 2.0 ships its own Composer model—optimized for coding and agentic tasks—and emphasizes fast inference and practical throughput for developer tasks. Cursor also remains model-agnostic in many integrations, enabling teams to choose ...
🌐
iTechs Online
itecsonline.com › post › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-vs-copilot
Google Antigravity vs Cursor vs Copilot: Enterprise Dev Tool Guide | ITECS Blog
November 19, 2025 - Google's new Antigravity platform introduces an agentic development paradigm where AI agents autonomously control your editor, terminal, and browser. This comprehensive analysis compares Antigravity's innovative artifact-based verification system against Cursor's rapid development velocity and GitHub Copilot's established enterprise compliance framework.
🌐
Humai
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
3 weeks ago - Price: $0/month (completely free) Verdict: Worth trying immediately, but not a complete Cursor replacement yet · Antigravity positions itself as a "multi-model AI coding environment" that gives you access to Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and GPT-4 within a single interface. According to Google's announcement, it achieves 76.2% on the SWE-bench coding benchmark, which puts it in the elite tier of AI coding performance.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptcoding › i tried google's new antigravity ide so you don't have to (vs cursor/windsurf)
r/ChatGPTCoding on Reddit: I tried Google's new Antigravity IDE so you don't have to (vs Cursor/Windsurf)
November 21, 2025 -

Google just dropped "Antigravity" (antigravity.google) and claims it's an "Agent-First" IDE. I've been using Cursor heavily for the past few months, so I decided to give this a spin to see if it's just hype or a real competitor.

My key takeaways after testing it:

  • The "Agent Manager" is the real deal: Unlike the linear chat in VS Code/Cursor, here you can spawn multiple agent threads. I managed to have one agent refactoring a messy LegacyUserProfile.js component while another agent was writing Jest tests for it simultaneously. It feels more like orchestration than coding.

  • Model Access: It currently offers Gemini 3 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet for free during the preview. That alone makes it worth the download.

  • Installation: It's a VS Code fork, so migration (extensions, keybindings) took about 30 seconds.

The "Vibe Coding" Trap: I noticed that because it's so powerful, it's easy to get lazy. I did a test run generating a Frontend component from a screenshot.

  • Attempt 1 (Lazy prompt): The code worked but the CSS was messy.

  • Attempt 2 (Senior prompt): I explicitly asked for BEM methodology and semantic HTML. The result was production-ready.

Conclusion: It might not kill Cursor today, but the multi-agent workflow is definitely superior for complex tasks.

I made a full video breakdown showing the installation and the 3-agent demo in action if you want to see the UI: https://youtu.be/M06VEfzFHZY?si=W_3OVIzrSJY4IXBv

Has anyone else tried the multi-agent feature yet? How does it compare to Windsurf's flows for you?

Find elsewhere
🌐
Stackademic
blog.stackademic.com › i-compared-google-antigravity-against-cursor-ai-across-real-engineering-workflows-0eb4a2abba9e
Antigravity vs Cursor AI Which IDE Actually Wins
November 23, 2025 - I Compared Google Antigravity Against Cursor AI Across Real Engineering Workflows…. A lived-in comparison of Antigravity vs Cursor AI covering speed, accuracy, security, data residency, and large-repo performance..
🌐
Medium
medium.com › data-science-in-your-pocket › cursor-vs-google-antigravity-best-ai-ide-for-vibe-coders-f3ecbd02f161
Cursor vs Google AntiGravity : Best AI IDE for Vibe Coders? | by Mehul Gupta | Data Science in Your Pocket | Nov, 2025 | Medium
4 weeks ago - Cursor is for craft + velocity. You care less about code elegance and more about seeing ideas breathe quickly. You jump between 5 unfinished SaaS concepts per month. You’d happily trade tight control for radical leverage.
🌐
Medium
medium.com › ai-software-engineer › i-tested-new-google-antigravity-ide-and-discovered-the-real-cursor-killer-96ffa7e55026
I Tested (New) Google Antigravity IDE (And Discovered the Real Cursor Killer) | by Joe Njenga | AI Software Engineer | Nov, 2025 | Medium
November 24, 2025 - Antigravity offers a much better AI coding model than Cursor’s recently built Composer. We’re talking about Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and GPT models all in one editor. If this won’t destroy Cursor’s dominance, nothing will.
🌐
Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity
Did Google Just Kill Cursor with Antigravity?
November 19, 2025 - Google launches Antigravity, a revolutionary AI-first IDE powered by Gemini 3 that outperforms Cursor in code generation, context awareness, and API integration. Developers now question if Cursor's dominance ends here.
🌐
Skywork
skywork.ai › home › antigravity vs cursor: which ai coding tool is better?
Antigravity vs Cursor: Which AI Coding Tool Is Better? - Skywork ai
2 weeks ago - You give it a higher-level task (“build a simple auth flow”), and it tries to plan, create files, run steps, and open PRs. It leans autonomous. You supervise. Antigravity’s agent logic [can chain actions to complete multi-step tasks]. Cursor is an AI-Powered IDE (it’s based on VS Code) that boosts the way you already code.
🌐
Vertu
vertu.com › best post › google antigravity launched: gemini 3 agent platform vs. cursor & claude code
Google Antigravity: Agentic IDE Powered by Gemini 3 vs. Cursor & Claude Code Comparison
November 22, 2025 - While Cursor excels at integrating AI into familiar workflows and Claude Code provides terminal-first autonomous coding, Antigravity introduces a third paradigm: agent-first development with browser-based verification and multi-modal capabilities.
🌐
Medium
timtech4u.medium.com › google-antigravity-the-cursor-killer-has-arrived-7c194f845f7d
Google Antigravity: The “Cursor Killer” Has Arrived? | by Timothy | Nov, 2025 | Medium
November 18, 2025 - Cursor won hearts by making AI feel native to VS Code. It excels at augmenting your coding speed — predicting your next edit, answering questions about your codebase, and fixing errors as you type.
🌐
GitConnected
levelup.gitconnected.com › antigravity-vs-cursor-vs-vscode-what-i-have-observed-after-using-them-for-1-week-da6353651b18
Antigravity vs Cursor vs VSCode: What I have observed after using them for 1 week | by Dhruvam | Nov, 2025 | Level Up Coding
3 weeks ago - If you’re trying to choose between Antigravity, Cursor.ai, and VS Code, this article isn’t just a comparison — it’s a map to help you decide where each fits in your daily development life.
🌐
SourceForge
sourceforge.net › software › compare › Cursor-vs-Google-Antigravity
Cursor vs. Google Antigravity Comparison
November 19, 2025 - Compare Cursor vs. Google Antigravity using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
🌐
The Verge
theverge.com › news › ai › tech
Google Antigravity is an ‘agent-first’ coding tool built for Gemini 3 | The Verge
Antigravity will also report on its actions and external tool use along the way, but Google says that Artifacts are “easier for users to verify” than full lists of a models’ actions and tool calls. Antigravity’s other big change is that it offers two main usage views. The default Editor view offers a familiar Integrated Development Environment (IDE) experience, similar to rivals like Cursor and GitHub Copilot, with an agent in a side panel.
Published   November 18, 2025
🌐
Medium
medium.com › @integrationninjas › google-antigravity-the-free-cursor-killer-first-look-and-hands-on-experience-e91ff5bf447b
Google Antigravity: The Free Cursor Killer? First Look and Hands-On Experience | by Integrations Ninjas | Nov, 2025 | Medium
November 20, 2025 - The AI coding space has been dominated by tools like Cursor and Windsurf for the last year. Developers have grown accustomed to tab-autocomplete and chat sidebars. But Google has just entered the arena with something different; something that aims to shift the paradigm from AI Assistant to Autonomous Agent. It’s called Google Antigravity.