🌐
My Memory
putridparrot.com › blog › using-lodash-in-typescript
Using lodash in TypeScript | My Memory
Was trying to use lodash and couldn’t seem to get Visual Code to build my TypeScript files correctly, so here’s how to get it working…
🌐
Medium
sanjanahumanintech.medium.com › lodash-library-usage-in-javascript-typescript-cafc82818dd5
Lodash Library usage in Javascript/typescript | by Sanjana Human In Tech | Medium
November 26, 2023 - import _ from 'lodash'; const fruits = ['apple', 'banana', 'orange', 'grape', 'apple']; const groupedByFruit = _.groupBy(fruits); console.log(groupedByFruit); // { apple: 2, banana: 1, orange: 1, grape: 1 } Thank you for reading this article! Don’t forget to clap only if you think I deserve it👏 and buy me a coffee. If you have any queries related to ReactNative, I’m always happy to help you.
Discussions

Importing lodash into angular2 + typescript application
I am having a hard time trying to get the lodash modules imported. I've setup my project using npm+gulp, and keep hitting the same wall. I've tried the regular lodash, but also lodash-es. The lodas... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
How to debounce Lodash call to fetch in Typescript properly?
I'm relatively new to React & Typescript/JS and am trying to understand how to debounce a call to a promise properly. There's a button to increment/decrement a desired purchase quantity and only after a certain period of time do I want to actually execute the call to the backend API, to avoid the user just repeatedly hitting the +/- buttons and spamming the server. import debounce from 'lodash... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
A Typescript-first alternative to Lodash/Underscore
Check out ‘radash’ on npm. It advertises itself as a ‘modern lodash’ lol. It has almost everything lodash has, written with first-class TS. Unfortunately, something to keep in mind is that the maintainer of the project hasn’t merged any pull requests or fixed any issues in the last couple of months. Which couldd be a problem based on your needs. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/typescript
41
42
January 20, 2023
How to import lodash in a typescript library package?
I'd like to centralize my generic most-used (typescript) functions in a Util package which I can reuse across my projects. Turned out more difficult than expected. This package is not going to be More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
🌐
Delft Stack
delftstack.com › home › howto › typescript › lodash typescript
How to Use Lodash in TypeScript | Delft Stack
February 2, 2024 - If we provide only one parameter, it will take the starting point from 0. Let’s go through an example and try to generate a random number between 0 to 100 and 50 to 100. # typescript const _ = require("lodash"); let randNum = _.random(100); ...
🌐
Carl Rippon
carlrippon.com › using-lodash-debounce-with-react-and-ts
Using Lodash debounce with React and TypeScript
December 22, 2021 - Lodash doesn’t contain TypeScript types in the core package, so we install these separately: Terminal window · npm install @types/lodash · debounce is a named export in the lodash package, so we import it as follows: import { debounce } from "lodash" We use debounce to invoke the call to search after 300 milliseconds: async function handleChange(e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) { debounce(async () => { // 😕 debounced function never called ·
🌐
TypeScript
typescriptlang.org › docs › handbook › declaration-files › consumption.html
TypeScript: Documentation - Consumption
As an example, getting the declarations for a library like lodash takes nothing more than the following command ... It is worth noting that if the npm package already includes its declaration file as described in Publishing, downloading the corresponding @types package is not needed. From there you’ll be able to use lodash in your TypeScript ...
🌐
npm
npmjs.com › package › @types › lodash
@types/lodash - npm
February 23, 2026 - TypeScript definitions for lodash. Latest version: 4.17.24, last published: a month ago. Start using @types/lodash in your project by running `npm i @types/lodash`. There are 11418 other projects in the npm registry using @types/lodash.
      » npm install @types/lodash
    
🌐
CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io › s › 1kjh8
react-typescript-lodash - CodeSandbox
December 27, 2023 - react-typescript-lodash by anpleenko using @types/lodash, lodash, qs, react, react-dom, react-scripts
Published   Jan 12, 2021
Author   anpleenko
🌐
Lodash
lodash.com
Lodash
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras.
🌐
xjavascript
xjavascript.com › blog › lodash-react-typescript
Mastering Lodash, React, and TypeScript: A Comprehensive Guide — xjavascript.com
You can also use Lodash to manipulate the state of a React component. For example, let's use cloneDeep to create a deep copy of an object in the state:
Find elsewhere
Top answer
1 of 16
508

Here is how to do this as of Typescript 2.0: (tsd and typings are being deprecated in favor of the following):

$ npm install --save lodash

# This is the new bit here: 
$ npm install --save-dev @types/lodash

Then, in your .ts file:

Either:

import * as _ from "lodash";

Or (as suggested by @Naitik):

import _ from "lodash";

I'm not positive what the difference is. We use and prefer the first syntax. However, some report that the first syntax doesn't work for them, and someone else has commented that the latter syntax is incompatible with lazy loaded webpack modules. YMMV.

Edit on Feb 27th, 2017:

According to @Koert below, import * as _ from "lodash"; is the only working syntax as of Typescript 2.2.1, lodash 4.17.4, and @types/lodash 4.14.53. He says that the other suggested import syntax gives the error "has no default export".

2 of 16
70

Update September 26, 2016:

As @Taytay's answer says, instead of the 'typings' installations that we used a few months ago, we can now use:

npm install --save @types/lodash

Here are some additional references supporting that answer:

  • https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/lodash
  • TypeScript typings in NPM @types org packages

If still using the typings installation, see the comments below (by others) regarding '''--ambient''' and '''--global'''.

Also, in the new Quick Start, config is no longer in index.html; it's now in systemjs.config.ts (if using SystemJS).

Original Answer:

This worked on my mac (after installing Angular 2 as per Quick Start):

sudo npm install typings --global
npm install lodash --save 
typings install lodash --ambient --save

You will find various files affected, e.g.

  • /typings/main.d.ts
  • /typings.json
  • /package.json

Angular 2 Quickstart uses System.js, so I added 'map' to the config in index.html as follows:

System.config({
    packages: {
      app: {
        format: 'register',
        defaultExtension: 'js'
      }
    },
    map: {
      lodash: 'node_modules/lodash/lodash.js'
    }
  });

Then in my .ts code I was able to do:

import _ from 'lodash';

console.log('lodash version:', _.VERSION);

Edits from mid-2016:

As @tibbus mentions, in some contexts, you need:

import * as _ from 'lodash';

If starting from angular2-seed, and if you don't want to import every time, you can skip the map and import steps and just uncomment the lodash line in tools/config/project.config.ts.

To get my tests working with lodash, I also had to add a line to the files array in karma.conf.js:

'node_modules/lodash/lodash.js',
🌐
MoldStud
moldstud.com › articles › developers faq › lodash developers questions › how to use lodash in a react application?
How to use Lodash in a React application? | MoldStud
August 1, 2024 - Answer: Yes, Lodash is compatible with TypeScript and you can use type definitions to ensure type safety when working with Lodash functions in React components.
🌐
GitHub
github.com › typicode › react-lodash
GitHub - typicode/react-lodash: ⚛️ 🔧 Lodash as React components
react-lodash uses lodash documentation for prop names. For example, let's say you want to use _.get.
Starred by 352 users
Forked by 18 users
Languages   JavaScript 100.0% | JavaScript 100.0%
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/typescript › a typescript-first alternative to lodash/underscore
r/typescript on Reddit: A Typescript-first alternative to Lodash/Underscore
January 20, 2023 -

EDIT: I forgot to put a question mark at the end of the title. Whoops!

I understand that both libraries have "@types/..." that can easily be downloaded. Still, some corners of the library would have been better designed if they were initially built in Typescript rather than tacking on a.d.ts file later.

I am starting a new project and would like to know if any alternatives have been developed recently.

🌐
DEV Community
dev.to › tipsy_dev › advanced-typescript-reinventing-lodash-get-4fhe
Advanced TypeScript: reinventing lodash.get - DEV Community
September 5, 2021 - Why use lodash get when the path is static (i.e. you know it in advance)? For the first example just use user?.address?.street, and your code is perfectly readable and type-safe.
🌐
Upbeatcode
upbeatcode.com › react › how-to-use-lodash-in-react
How to Use Lodash in React | Upbeat Code
December 6, 2021 - This guide will teach you how add lodash into react project. And how to use lodash in React applications.
Top answer
1 of 1
1

I found two three possible working scenarios:

  1. Use TSdx, the Zero-config CLI for TypeScript package development. https://tsdx.io/
  2. Use lodash-es instead (but note that chains are not working in lodash-es!). Explanation below. This however still gives Jest errors when this library is imported in another library, and tested there.
  3. Use vitest instead. Vitest is largely compatible with the Jest api. After installing Vitest, everything simply worked, without any configuration. The only thing to do is to add import { assert, expect, test } from 'vitest' to your tests. If you have just started, and only have simple tests, they simply worked without any changes (YMMV). In addition, both lodash and lodash-es worked fine.

A better answer would include a scenario that uses "plain" lodash, or explains why lodash-es is actually a good thing. From what I'm reading in various posts is that lodash-es has several drawbacks (results in a larger bundle size, chains don't work).

Here is a working setup with (I think) sensible defaults. This library is for internal use, and I run Node 18, so I use a high target version here.

package.json

{
  "name": "@vexna/util",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "Generic utilities, uses lodash",
  "private": true,
  "type": "module",
  "main": "dist/index.js",
  "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
  "sideEffects": false,
  "scripts": {
    "build": "rimraf dist && tsc && rollup -c rollup.config.js",
    "test": "node test/spec",
    "pretest": "npm run build"
  },
  "keywords": [],
  "author": "",
  "license": "ISC",
  "devDependencies": {
    "@rollup/plugin-typescript": "^11.0.0",
    "@types/lodash-es": "^4.17.6",
    "lodash-es": "^4.17.21",
    "rimraf": "^4.1.2",
    "rollup": "^3.12.1",
    "typescript": "^4.9.5"
  },
  "files": [
    "dist"
  ],
  "peerDependencies": {
    "lodash": "^4.17.21"
  }
}

tsconfig.ts

{
    "compilerOptions": {
      "module": "es2022",
      "moduleResolution": "node",
      "outDir": "dist",
      "declaration": true,
      "sourceMap": true,
      "esModuleInterop": true,
      "allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true,
      "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
      "lib": ["es2022", "DOM", "DOM.Iterable"],
      "target": "es2022",
      "skipLibCheck": true,
      "strict": true,
      "exactOptionalPropertyTypes": true,
      "noImplicitAny": true,
      "noImplicitThis": true,
      "checkJs": true
    },
    "include": ["./src/**/*.ts"]
}

rollup.config.js

import typescript from '@rollup/plugin-typescript'
const input = ["src/index.ts"]

export default [
    {
        input,
        plugins: [
            typescript()],
        output: [
            {
                dir: "dist",
                sourcemap: true,
            }
        ],
        external: ['lodash-es'],
    }
]

The output has lodash entirely externalized, so very small bundle! As a precaution, I added "lodash": "^4.17.21" to the "peerDependencies". This is a little odd cause it's a mismatch with devDependencies (which uses the -es), but this seems fine. YMMV.

In the library code, you can import the lodash functions like so:

import { now, random, padStart } from "lodash-es"

A project that consumes this library must have lodash, and can import like so:

import { createUid } from '@vexna/util'
🌐
CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io › examples › package › @types › lodash-es
@types/lodash-es examples - CodeSandbox
react-typescript-styled-componentsbasic starter · Meli-Fe-Test · weslley.neri · idle-space · workflow-state-machine · air-conditioning · config-value-visualizer · r_v2 · x-kom-stanislaw-kurek · lehui · Find more examples or templates · AboutTypeScript definitions for lodash-es5,567,051Weekly Downloads ·
🌐
Aguidehub
aguidehub.com › blog › 2023-04-13-how-to-install-and-use-lodash-in-react-js
how to install and use lodash in react js?
April 13, 2023 - Example of change background color of mui table in React js with step by step tutorial - aGuideHubMarch 21, 20244 minsReactHow to set max width of mui table in react js · Example of set max width of mui table in React js with step by step tutorial - aGuideHubMarch 20, 20244 minsReactHow to ...