That's a great and very thoughtful question and you're absolutely right: this is something many IT admins and architects wonder about, but it rarely gets the nuanced answers it deserves. Let’s dig into it.
Short Answer: Yes, You Can Mix Business Premium with M365 E3/E5 on the Same Tenant
Microsoft does allow you to assign a mix of Microsoft 365 Business Premium and Microsoft 365 E3/E5 licenses within the same tenant. This is fully supported and quite common, especially in organizations that want to balance cost with capabilities — giving higher-tier features to users who need them and more streamlined protection to those who don’t.
But you're asking the right follow-up question:
What About Compliance, Security, and Policy Conflicts?
This is where it gets more complex, and where some real-world awareness matters especially around Defender, Purview, and tenant-wide policy behavior.
- Defender for Business vs Defender for Endpoint (E3/E5)
Microsoft Defender for Business (part of Business Premium) includes Defender for Endpoint P1, which is very capable, but not equal to P2 (which you get in E5).
If you’re running Microsoft Defender for Endpoint tenant-wide, you need to be cautious: the central Defender portal (security.microsoft.com) doesn’t separate settings by license tier it's tenant-scoped.
That means settings you apply for E5 users (P2) could spill over or appear to apply to Business Premium users, even though their license doesn't support certain features like automated investigation/remediation (AIR), threat analytics, or advanced hunting.
So what can you do?
Be very intentional about device groups and role-based access control (RBAC) in Defender.
Use Intune targeting to scope security configurations to specific groups based on their license.
Avoid enabling tenant-wide features in Defender that require P2 unless you’re absolutely sure Business Premium users are excluded.
- Microsoft Purview (Compliance, DLP, Audit, Info Protection)
This is another tricky one.
Purview capabilities differ across license tiers. E3 includes core DLP, sensitivity labels, and audit logging, while E5 expands into Insider Risk, Advanced eDiscovery, and Communication Compliance.
Business Premium, however, lacks most advanced Purview features.
What happens?
If you configure tenant-wide DLP or retention policies, they may still apply in a limited way to Business Premium users, but users without proper licensing won’t be protected at the same level — and in some cases, enforcement will silently fail or fallback to defaults.
Audit Premium is a good example: only E5 users get access to longer and more detailed audit logs.
So, best practice is:
Use licensing-aware policy scoping (e.g., dynamic groups, sensitivity label scopes).
Don’t assume that because a policy is “enabled tenant-wide,” it’s enforced uniformly across license tiers.
- Microsoft’s Official Position
Microsoft does officially allow mixing these licenses — there’s no compliance or terms-of-service issue. However, they emphasize that some services may behave differently or inconsistently when mixing license tiers. You’ll find subtle disclaimers in documentation like:
“Features are available depending on your licensing level. Not all users in your tenant will benefit from features enabled at a tenant-wide level unless properly licensed.”
That’s their way of saying: we won't block you, but you're responsible for scoping and understanding limitations.
Things to Watch Out For
Azure AD Premium P1/P2 features (like Conditional Access, Identity Protection, MFA policies) need to be scoped to users with the right licensing.
Auto-labeling (sensitivity labels) via Microsoft Purview requires careful targeting — otherwise, it may fail silently for Business Premium users.
Defender for Endpoint unified dashboards show all devices, but certain remediation actions will only be available for licensed users.
Greetings all! I've been chatting with a person who works at a company with approx 40 users. At first they purchased M365 Business Standard licenses - then they switched all the users to Office 365 E3 as they thought it was required for an Accounting application - it wasn't.
So I feel that they will do better with M365 Business Premium as a good fit with SMB's - yes that will reduce that mailbox size from 100GB to 50GB but they're all well below 50GB and have archiving turned on.
Did a lot of research...comparing the features...also had a look here - mind you dated July 2023: https://m365maps.com/matrix.htm#010001000000000000000
Now the costs are comparable....as purchased those O365 E3 licenses before those recent license changes.
So I'm trying to point out the advantages of switching to M365 Business Premium.
My understanding is that M365 BP provides advanced security features and better device/app management and provides for a less complex environment to support. Thinking of their needs also on that side as their current IT folks are new to M365 (no comment!) ;-) ....so I am not always available to assist.
M365 Business Premium will also provide their Compliance and Governance needs when they're ready to go there.
Am I missing something here? Any there any other pro's associated with that M365 Business Premium subscription vs O365 E3?
Many thanks in advance!
Cheers!
Can you mix Microsoft Business Premium with M365 E3/E5 on the same Tenant?
Differences between M365 Business Premium and Enterprise E3 with E5 security add-on?
Microsoft 365 Business Premium or E3 for an Organization of more than 300 employee
Office 365 E3 to Business Premium license
Videos
That's a great and very thoughtful question and you're absolutely right: this is something many IT admins and architects wonder about, but it rarely gets the nuanced answers it deserves. Let’s dig into it.
Short Answer: Yes, You Can Mix Business Premium with M365 E3/E5 on the Same Tenant
Microsoft does allow you to assign a mix of Microsoft 365 Business Premium and Microsoft 365 E3/E5 licenses within the same tenant. This is fully supported and quite common, especially in organizations that want to balance cost with capabilities — giving higher-tier features to users who need them and more streamlined protection to those who don’t.
But you're asking the right follow-up question:
What About Compliance, Security, and Policy Conflicts?
This is where it gets more complex, and where some real-world awareness matters especially around Defender, Purview, and tenant-wide policy behavior.
- Defender for Business vs Defender for Endpoint (E3/E5)
Microsoft Defender for Business (part of Business Premium) includes Defender for Endpoint P1, which is very capable, but not equal to P2 (which you get in E5).
If you’re running Microsoft Defender for Endpoint tenant-wide, you need to be cautious: the central Defender portal (security.microsoft.com) doesn’t separate settings by license tier it's tenant-scoped.
That means settings you apply for E5 users (P2) could spill over or appear to apply to Business Premium users, even though their license doesn't support certain features like automated investigation/remediation (AIR), threat analytics, or advanced hunting.
So what can you do?
Be very intentional about device groups and role-based access control (RBAC) in Defender.
Use Intune targeting to scope security configurations to specific groups based on their license.
Avoid enabling tenant-wide features in Defender that require P2 unless you’re absolutely sure Business Premium users are excluded.
- Microsoft Purview (Compliance, DLP, Audit, Info Protection)
This is another tricky one.
Purview capabilities differ across license tiers. E3 includes core DLP, sensitivity labels, and audit logging, while E5 expands into Insider Risk, Advanced eDiscovery, and Communication Compliance.
Business Premium, however, lacks most advanced Purview features.
What happens?
If you configure tenant-wide DLP or retention policies, they may still apply in a limited way to Business Premium users, but users without proper licensing won’t be protected at the same level — and in some cases, enforcement will silently fail or fallback to defaults.
Audit Premium is a good example: only E5 users get access to longer and more detailed audit logs.
So, best practice is:
Use licensing-aware policy scoping (e.g., dynamic groups, sensitivity label scopes).
Don’t assume that because a policy is “enabled tenant-wide,” it’s enforced uniformly across license tiers.
- Microsoft’s Official Position
Microsoft does officially allow mixing these licenses — there’s no compliance or terms-of-service issue. However, they emphasize that some services may behave differently or inconsistently when mixing license tiers. You’ll find subtle disclaimers in documentation like:
“Features are available depending on your licensing level. Not all users in your tenant will benefit from features enabled at a tenant-wide level unless properly licensed.”
That’s their way of saying: we won't block you, but you're responsible for scoping and understanding limitations.
Things to Watch Out For
Azure AD Premium P1/P2 features (like Conditional Access, Identity Protection, MFA policies) need to be scoped to users with the right licensing.
Auto-labeling (sensitivity labels) via Microsoft Purview requires careful targeting — otherwise, it may fail silently for Business Premium users.
Defender for Endpoint unified dashboards show all devices, but certain remediation actions will only be available for licensed users.
Thank you very much for the detailed reply @Cherrelyn. Much appreciated. This makes sense to me.