Does they serve different purposes? I want to charge my surface tablet and also my computer HP

Chinese: https://www.lulian.cn/product/713-cn.html
English: https://www.ugreen.com/products/65w-4-port-3c1a-gan-pd-charger
Amazon.ca link: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B088FHJLR1/

Claimed technical specs per the Chinese site:

C1, C2 (shared): 5V/3A 9V/3A 12V/3A 15V/3A 20V/3.25V; PPS 3.3V-21V/3A
NOTE: PPS spec is not listed on English site and Amazon!

C3: 5V/3A 9V/2A 12V/1.5A

A: 4.5V/5A 5V/4.5A 5V/3A 9V/2A 12V/1.5A

no detailed breakdown of power splits with multiple ports

Claimed technical specs per the English site:

Supported fast charging protocols: PPS/PD3.0/PD2.0, QC4+/QC4.0/Qc3.0/QC2.0, AFC, FCP/sCP/sFCP PE2.0/PE1.1, BC1.2

claims to use Power Integrations SC1933C - also used by some GaN-based PD chargers that don't use the Navitas GaNFast platform

no detailed breakdown of power splits with multiple ports

Now, the problem with this charger, besides the fact that no Ugreen product exists on the USB-IF database (unlikely even, given that it supports so many proprietary fast charging protocols)... in the Amazon page's description, Ugreen claimed

Safe and Reliable Charging with Multi-Protection:
UL certified wall charger with built-in multi charging protection chips protects your charging device from over-voltage, over-heating, short-circuiting

Apparently they're lying. One Amazon Vine reviewer posted a picture of this 65W charger's electrical information - and there are no UL/ETL logo or markings. Another wrote that no such entry exists on the UL database for this charger.