ATLAS.ti
atlasti.com › maxqda-vs-atlasti-comparison
MAXQDA vs. ATLAS.ti | Best Qualitative Data Analysis Software - ATLAS.ti
Text Search is more powerful in ATLAS.ti, allowing for searches of synonyms and more complex queries to get the most relevant data. The flexibility of the Text Search tool allows users to construct a single search with multiple keywords to narrow the scope of the data to a specific set of text segments that can be coded, regardless of where the data is in your project. The Word Frequencies tool has greater flexibility than MAXQDA's Word Cloud in filtering parts of speech and providing options for stop and go lists to tailor your content analysis.
Met-Hodos
methodos.hypotheses.org › 1575
MAXQDA or ATLAS.ti? How software shapes research | Met-Hodos
Although both basically use SQL-databases, there is a striking difference in their internal logic. While MAXQDA follows the structure of a relational data basis, ATLAS.ti is organized like a graph data base and this strongly influences the way ...
Videos
01:23:50
How does QualCoder compare with NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA? - YouTube
25:00
Decoding AI Summaries: Assessing ATLAS.ti Against Other Tools - ...
The Journey Part 6a: Sorting and Organizing Codes in ATLAS.ti and ...
02:57
How to Easily Transcribe and Code Interviews with MAXQDA, Nvivo ...
14:59
NVivo vs ATLAS.ti - which data analysis software is better? - YouTube
ATLAS.ti
atlasti.com › research-hub › atlas-ti-alternative-to-other-programs
ATLAS.ti - Alternative to NVivo, MAXQDA, etc. | Comparison - ATLAS.ti
The possibility of coding video data in MAXQDA is very limited. That program allows you to roughly code interesting segments but does not allow you to fine-tune your selection or modify it. It only allows you the basic segmentation of the video without permitting in-depth analysis of the video material directly. If a transcript for your video is available, you can import it from other sources (F4 / F5 / Transana); or create one in ATLAS.ti directly.
Capterra
capterra.com › home › qualitative data analysis software › atlas.ti vs maxqda
Compare ATLAS.ti vs MAXQDA 2025 | Capterra
"E.g. It would be great to be able to select multiple files/codes/other entities at the same time."See full review ... "I felt like they passed the ball between them and no one wanted to take responsibility for the problem."See full review ... "ATLAS.ti was key in helping us to achieve a complex, multi-country research study with large amounts of qualitative data in a simple, straightforward, and..."See full review
Dellu
dellu.wordpress.com › 2018 › 10 › 11 › maxqda-vs-atlasti
MaxQDA vs AtlasTi – Dellu
April 29, 2019 - These two QDA applications are truly amazing. Maxqda is much faster when importing documents. I was impressed how fast it imports the documents in comparison to NVIVo specifically.
Delve
delvetool.com › blog › atlasti-vs-maxqda-vs-delve
MAXQDA vs. ATLAS.ti vs. Delve: What's the Best Qualitative Coding Software? — Delve
January 17, 2024 - You can’t set up a mixed-team project where some people work in the desktop version and others in the web version. MAXQDA is recognized for its versatility and ability to support mixed-method research.
SourceForge
sourceforge.net › software › compare › ATLAS.ti-vs-MAXQDA
ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA Comparison
Compare ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
G2
g2.com › compare › atlas-ti-vs-maxqda
Compare ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA | G2
Reviewers felt that ATLAS.ti meets the needs of their business better than MAXQDA.
Address 100 S Wacker DrSTE 600, 60606, Chicago
Wordpress
software4scholars.wordpress.com › 2010 › 09 › 06 › maxqda-or-atlas-ti
MaxQDA or Atlas.ti? | software for scholars
November 4, 2011 - What makes me think that MaxQDA is better is its more intuitive (and prettier) user interface and such things as its visualization tools. Apart from the better pdf-support, another advantage of Atlas.ti might be the better integration of audio ...
Top answer 1 of 2
3
Both are good qualitative data analysis (QDA) software. However, each excels at certain aspects. For example, ATLAS.ti shines at online collaboration and theory building. On the other hand, MAXQDA stands out in quantitative content analysis and mixed methods research. You could check out the following libguide for a detailed comparison of various QDA packages, including ATLAS.ti and MAXQDA.
George Mason University Libraries. (2022, April 22). Qualitative research & tools. InfoGuides at George Mason University. https://infoguides.gmu.edu/qual/software/choose
Good luck,
2 of 2
0
Thank you for your suggestion. Really appreciate it.
Top answer 1 of 4
2
The major qualitative data analysis software packages all have very similar basic functions. To see which one is more comfortable for you, I suggest that you look at the training videos for each of the two packages.
One recent recent development is that MAXQDA has an option for using ChatGPT to assist in the data analysis process, while NVivo does not have this option.
2 of 4
0
All these are proprietary tools for qualitative data analysis with some or the other difference in visualization of output style based on the selected analysis plan. I think, referring to the kind of research papers you are reading might help you by understanding what tool those authors used. Opps, so logical! Sometimes just doing and upscaling our capabilities (skills + capacity) consistently using one of those comparable tools would help. Ohh, so philosophical!
Rgds
SourceForge
sourceforge.net › software › compare › ATLAS.ti-vs-MAXQDA-vs-NVivo
ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA vs. NVivo Comparison
Compare ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA vs. NVivo using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
Top answer 1 of 11
11
I think all the major qualitative software programs are quite comparable in terms of the features they offer. In practice, whenever one of them offers new features, the others add similar features in their next version, in order to stay competitive.
I have used both MAX and ATLAS, and while I prefer MAX, that is primarily due to it "look and feel" rather than anything it can do that ATLAS cannot. At this point, all of them are "pushing" mixed methods, but that simply means that you can attach quantitative variables to each case, which is just as easy to do in ATLAS.
My opinion is that all the programs are equally useful for Grounded Theory, since they are all based on the same "mark and retrieve" format that was the original basis for manual coding. ATLAS did make some early and rather inappropriate claims for a relationship to GT (e.g., calling the number of times a code appears "groundedness"), but those have mostly disappeared over the years.
Do you have anything specific you want to do that might require the unique features of one program or the other?
2 of 11
1
I agree with Davids opinion. Maybe you have the chance to get ATLAS or MaxQDA from university or your institute? Sometimes they have shared licenses for students or researchers. If the two softwares are too expensive, try f4. But its not the best for GT, because there are not this much functions.
MERIT
merit.education.wisc.edu › qualitative-software-support › choosing-a-qda-package
Choosing a QDA Package - MERIT
November 18, 2024 - When it comes to the cost of the software licenses, the time needed to learn the software, getting help when you run into trouble, and how well they handle the specific types of data and methods you use there can be significant differences. This guide will compare and contrast four popular programs; NVivo, MaxQDA, Atlas.ti, and Dedoose.
Ailyze
ailyze.com › blogs › definitive-qda-software-guide-2025-ailyze-nvivo-atlas-ti-maxqda-compared
AILYZE, NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and MAXQDA Compared
We cannot provide a description for this page right now
Slashdot
slashdot.org › software › data analysis software › atlas.ti vs. maxqda
Compare ATLAS.ti vs. MAXQDA in 2025
Examine a wide range of data types, including but not limited to texts, images, audio and video files, websites, tweets, focus group discussions, and survey results. MAXQDA stands out as both a powerful and user-friendly tool, being the only top-tier qualitative data analysis software that offers a completely identical experience on both Windows and Mac platforms.
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
‘Commonalities between NVivo, MAXQDA and other similar data analysis software’ - YouTube
On the 24th May 2023 the ARC NWC Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation & Support Theme (MIDAS) Theme invited attendees to an on-line seminar on ...
Published May 25, 2023
George Mason University
infoguides.gmu.edu › qual › software › choose
Choosing - QUALitative Research & Tools - InfoGuides at George Mason University
Atlas.ti - Originally designed for Grounded theory analysis, Atlas.ti excels at memos and other tools for theory building. It also has network tools and a companion online version.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/askacademia › for those who have done qualitative research with thematic analysis, is atlasti a good tool for this purpose?
r/AskAcademia on Reddit: For those who have done qualitative research with thematic analysis, is Atlasti a good tool for this purpose?
August 27, 2022 -
I tried with Nvivo and it was very difficult in terms of contacting technical support and installing the software.
I'm a beginner with "Atlasti", and have considered it for my qualitative analysis, specifically for thematic analysis.
For those who have done qualitative research with thematic analysis, is Atlasti a good tool for this purpose?
Top answer 1 of 8
12
Frankly Google sheets was the best tool we used.
2 of 8
5
It’s less feature rich than Nvivo, and I find it a bit harder to use. The online version is quite good for coding, but it’s even more light weight. Frankly, none are that hard to use once you get used to them. Maybe watch some more videos about people using them to try and find your groove.