I was recently looking for such instructions, and most of them are complicated. Good job. More on reddit.com

Hey! Not sure if this post is still active at all but I work for a PR and digital reputation management firm that handles these sorts of requests pretty frequently so I can weigh in on this. The method shared in this post may work for removing PII from data brokers (occasionally) but if you’re dealing with search results that are derived from news sources, websites/blogs, crime data aggregators, etc., this method won’t be of much use to you. Third-party sources have a right to report on news or content they believe to be relevant and they don’t necessarily need your consent in order to do so. Google supports them in that regard so utilizing their removal request form won’t net you any meaningful results. There’s a couple of strategies we typically employ when dealing with negative search results, with the first and most common approach being suppression through positive content creation. This involves creating new content about yourself or your business that is positive and optimized for search engines, which will push the negative results further down in the search rankings. For example, say that you have a mugshot in the Florida State Records Registry that appears on the first page of Google under your name. Their domain “florida.staterecords” has a domain authority score of 45 and the article mentions your full name a total of two times on the link’s page. If we were to publish a 500 word fluff-piece on say “Mashable”, which has a DA score of 92 and mentions your name a total of seven times, it will almost instantly outrank Florida State Records’ measly link in the SERPs. This fluff-piece can generally be about anything: an accomplishment, charity work, phony award, opinion piece, etc. And keep in mind that a Mashable feature would likely be overkill in this particular instance and the same result can be accomplished with far cheaper and less reputable Google-news approved sites. Articles on 90+ DA sites like Mashable, Forbes, Newsweek, IGN, etc. are typically reserved for scenarios involving negative press from other reputable sites or local news outlets. While suppression is oftentimes the most guaranteed and straightforward way of dealing with negative search results, if it’s absolutely imperative to you that there is no mention of the negative link ANYWHERE on Google, then that leaves two other options: legal maneuvering and de-indexing of links. Legal maneuvering would basically involve us working with an attorney to have the negative content removed from the internet on the basis of libel and defamation. This can be a lengthy and costly process with no guarantee of success, but it can be effective in removing the content entirely with no chances of it resurfacing again. De-indexing of links is another option, which involves working with search engines to remove the offending links from their search results. Also not fully reliable as it’s completely reliant on Google’s algorithm and other varying SEO tactics but it accomplishes the same job as the removal of content from the site. The link will not be seen anywhere on Google, whether it be on page 1 or page 90. That’s basically what we offer in our “remove negative search results” service. The content will still remain on the site, of course, but in order to find it, one would need to already know of its existence and search for it on the offending site. Google will simply never show it, regardless of what keyword you type. Even searching for the exact URL link will show 0 results found. However, for de-indexing campaigns, this practice is often not sanctioned by the sites hosting the content so it is best utilized for negative search results that have had time to age. Attempting to de-index content posted within the last couple of months can oftentimes lead to the web masters simply re-formatting the links or changing the permalink and resubmitting for indexing. You can spend a lot of money and time successfully accomplishing this just for the same link to appear the following day with some slight alterations. When running de-indexing campaigns for links that have been around for a year or two, even if the site owners took notice of the de-indexing, they will oftentimes not bother republishing the content as the news are simply no longer relevant. However, the risk is still there nonetheless hence why suppression is still the best solution for some semblance of guaranteed results. I’m open to doing a bit of an AMA on this subject so feel free to DM or simply ask your question below. If anyone’s still visiting this post, hope y’all learned something new! • ⁠Larissa @ Maximatic Media More on reddit.com

You may get some off, but it will soon be back. There is no privacy. More on reddit.com

I found the tool. https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/12719076?hl=en More on reddit.com