They are not equivalent. The first will execute the block following the if statement if myVar is truthy (i.e. evaluates to true in a conditional), while the second will execute the block if myVar is any value other than null.
The only values that are not truthy in JavaScript are the following (a.k.a. falsy values):
nullundefined0""(the empty string)falseNaN
javascript - How to check if a variable is not null? - Stack Overflow
javascript check for not null - Stack Overflow
How do I check for null values in JavaScript? - Stack Overflow
Good way to check for variable being not null and not undefined.
Videos
They are not equivalent. The first will execute the block following the if statement if myVar is truthy (i.e. evaluates to true in a conditional), while the second will execute the block if myVar is any value other than null.
The only values that are not truthy in JavaScript are the following (a.k.a. falsy values):
nullundefined0""(the empty string)falseNaN
Here is how you can test if a variable is not NULL:
if (myVar !== null) {...}
the block will be executed if myVar is not null.. it will be executed if myVar is undefined or false or 0 or NaN or anything else..
this will do the trick for you
if (!!val) {
alert("this is not null")
} else {
alert("this is null")
}
There are 3 ways to check for "not null". My recommendation is to use the Strict Not Version.
1. Strict Not Version
if (val !== null) { ... }
The Strict Not Version uses the Strict Equality Comparison Algorithm. The !== operator has faster performance than the != operator, because the Strict Equality Comparison Algorithm doesn't typecast values.
2. Non-strict Not Version
if (val != null) { ... }
The Non-strict Not Version uses the Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm. The != operator has slower performance than the !== operator, because the Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm typecasts values.
3. Double Not Version
if (!!val) { ... }
The Double Not Version has faster performance than both the Strict Not Version and the Non-Strict Not Version. However, the !! operator will typecast "falsey" values like 0, '', undefined and NaN into false, which may lead to unexpected results, and it has worse readability because null isn't explicitly stated.
JavaScript is very flexible with regards to checking for "null" values. I'm guessing you're actually looking for empty strings, in which case this simpler code will work:
if(!pass || !cpass || !email || !cemail || !user){
Which will check for empty strings (""), null, undefined, false and the numbers 0 and NaN.
Please note that if you are specifically checking for numbers, it is a common mistake to miss 0 with this method, and num !== 0 is preferred (or num !== -1 or ~num (hacky code that also checks against -1)) for functions that return -1, e.g. indexOf).
To check for null SPECIFICALLY you would use this:
if (variable === null)
This test will ONLY pass for null and will not pass for "", undefined, false, 0, or NaN.
Additionally, I've provided absolute checks for each "false-like" value (one that would return true for !variable).
Note, for some of the absolute checks, you will need to implement use of the absolutely equals: === and typeof.
I've created a JSFiddle here to show all of the individual tests working
Here is the output of each check:
Null Test:
if (variable === null)
- variable = ""; (false) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (true) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number
Empty String Test:
if (variable === '')
- variable = ''; (true) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number
Undefined Test:
if (typeof variable == "undefined")
-- or --
if (variable === undefined)
- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (true) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number
False Test:
if (variable === false)
- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (true) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number
Zero Test:
if (variable === 0)
- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (true) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number
NaN Test:
if (typeof variable == 'number' && !parseFloat(variable) && variable !== 0)
-- or --
if (isNaN(variable))
- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string
- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object
- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined
- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean
- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number
- variable = NaN; (true) typeof variable = number
As you can see, it's a little more difficult to test against NaN;
Hi, all, I often do stuff like this in my code, to check for a variable being not null and not undefined.
// check if value is not null and not undefined
if (value) {
...
}
However, I'm now thinking this can leads to bugs, because of 0, "", false and NaN also being falsy.
What is a better way to check a variable is not null and not undefined? I could use this I think, wondering if there is something shorter than this:
if (typeof value !== 'undefined' || value !== null) {
...
}