Together with the LLVM LangRef, you can just run @code_llvm of various Julia functions and try to decode how it maps to the functions definition (or output of @code_typed). For each instruction you generate that you don’t understand, read the description for it in the LangRef (sounds obvious, but yo… Answer from jpsamaroo on discourse.julialang.org
LLVM
llvm.org › docs › LangRef.html
LLVM Language Reference Manual — LLVM 23.0.0git documentation
May 12, 2026 - The LLVM code representation is designed to be used in three different forms: as an in-memory compiler IR, as an on-disk bitcode representation (suitable for fast loading by a Just-In-Time compiler), and as a human readable assembly language representation. This allows LLVM to provide a powerful intermediate representation for efficient compiler transformations and analysis, while providing a natural means to debug and visualize the transformations.
AMD ROCm
rocm.docs.amd.com › projects › llvm-project › en › latest › LLVM › llvm › html › LangRef.html
LLVM Language Reference Manual — LLVM 22.0.0git documentation
The LLVM code representation is designed to be used in three different forms: as an in-memory compiler IR, as an on-disk bitcode representation (suitable for fast loading by a Just-In-Time compiler), and as a human readable assembly language representation. This allows LLVM to provide a powerful intermediate representation for efficient compiler transformations and analysis, while providing a natural means to debug and visualize the transformations.
GitHub
github.com › llvm › llvm-project › blob › main › mlir › docs › LangRef.md
llvm-project/mlir/docs/LangRef.md at main · llvm/llvm-project
The LLVM Project is a collection of modular and reusable compiler and toolchain technologies. - llvm-project/mlir/docs/LangRef.md at main · llvm/llvm-project
Author llvm
Google
android.googlesource.com › toolchain › llvm › + › refs › heads › master › docs › LangRef.rst
docs/LangRef.rst - toolchain/llvm - Git at Google
android/toolchain/llvm/refs/heads/main/./docs/LangRef.rst ·
Carnegie Mellon University
cs.cmu.edu › afs › cs › academic › class › 15745-s14 › public › lectures › L6-LLVM-Part2-1up.pdf pdf
Carnegie Mellon Lecture 6 More on the LLVM Compiler Deby Katz
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html · ● · Writing an LLVM Pass · – · http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html · ● · LLVM’s Analysis and Transform Passes · – · http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html · ● · LLVM Internal Documentation · – · http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ – ·
Readthedocs
mapping-high-level-constructs-to-llvm-ir.readthedocs.io › en › latest › a-quick-primer › index.html
A Quick Primer — Mapping High Level Constructs to LLVM IR documentation
While you are playing around with generating or writing LLVM IR, you may want to add the option -fsanitize=undefined to Clang/Clang++ insofar you use either of those. This option makes Clang/Clang++ insert run-time checks in places where it would normally output an ud2 instruction.
Top answer 1 of 4
3
Together with the LLVM LangRef, you can just run @code_llvm of various Julia functions and try to decode how it maps to the functions definition (or output of @code_typed). For each instruction you generate that you don’t understand, read the description for it in the LangRef (sounds obvious, but yo…
2 of 4
0
Thanks for the hints! Sounds logical.
I was wondering if there is some kind of reference for each command?
For example pushq seems to increment a counter for a GC system. But to figure out that I need to read a bit on the general description and understand the example code from context:
https://l…
Google Groups
groups.google.com › g › llvm-dev › c › FIKndoYoc6Y › m › oRHesgUZB08J
[LLVMdev] [BUG] Varargs example in LangRef segfaults
Try the following on x86_64: -- 8< -- define i32 @test(i32 %X, ...) { ; Initialize variable argument processing %ap = alloca i8* %ap2 = bitcast i8** %ap to i8* call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %ap2) ; Read a single integer argument %tmp = va_arg i8** %ap, i32 ; Demonstrate usage of llvm.va_copy and llvm.va_end %aq = alloca i8* %aq2 = bitcast i8** %aq to i8* call void @llvm.va_copy(i8* %aq2, i8* %ap2) call void @llvm.va_end(i8* %aq2) ; Stop processing of arguments. call void @llvm.va_end(i8* %ap2) ret i32 %tmp } define i32 @main() { �ll = call i32 (i32, ...)* @test(i32 1, i32 3) ret i32 �ll } declare void @llvm.va_start(i8*) declare void @llvm.va_copy(i8*, i8*) declare void @llvm.va_end(i8*) -- 8< -- It happens because va_arg is apparently not implemented properly on X86 (I saw tests/Codegen/X86/vaargs.ll). What should be done about the situation? 1. Update the LangRef.
MLIR
mlir.llvm.org › docs › LangRef
MLIR Language Reference - MLIR
Dialects provide a modular way in which targets can expose target-specific operations directly through to MLIR. As an example, some targets go through LLVM. LLVM has a rich set of intrinsics for certain target-independent operations (e.g. addition with overflow check) as well as providing access to target-specific operations for the targets it supports (e.g.
Google Groups
groups.google.com › g › llvm-dev › c › S7zYRCHMf0o
[llvm-dev] What is relationship between Operator and Instruction?
June 10, 2021 - As the code base is really huge ... in LangRef. In such a case, many times I used gdb/lldb debugger tools for understanding the pipeline. Use debugging tools and identify the logic that is responsible for generating instructions(Operators and ConstantExprs). I am giving you directions to get started with understanding LLVM ...
LLVM
reviews.llvm.org › D63525
⚙ D63525 LangRef: Attempt to formulate some rules for addrspacecast
June 18, 2019 - If agreed, some work will be needed to comply with these rules · Thanks for working on this, it's a seriously underspecified part of LLVM
LLVM
reviews.llvm.org › D65718
⚙ D65718 [LangRef] Document forward-progress requirement
August 4, 2019 - Followup on a recent discussion on D59978: It seems that the current consensus is that LLVM has a forward-progress requirement and also intends to keep it in the future. llvm.sideeffect is not a temporary workaround, but the final solution. While this is pretty disappointing for non-C++ frontends, ...
Hacker News
news.ycombinator.com › item
Cf. https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#select-instruction No branching, and the ... | Hacker News
May 7, 2024 - No branching, and the hard part in FHE is to evaluate this when the bit is encrypted. The results are the same type, so all you see after the op is that the result is a ciphertext · Distributed Computing Through Combinatorial Topology: https://www.amazon.com/Distributed-Computing-Through-Combina
LLVM
reviews.llvm.org › D93376
⚙ D93376 [LangRef] Clarify the semantics of lifetime intrinsics
December 15, 2020 - This is a proposal for clarifying the semantics of lifetime.start / lifetime.end with @nlopes, @RalfJung. IIUC, the intrinsics are introduced to represent lifetimes of local variables while keeping allocas at the entry block in IR. However, their semantics was poorly described in LangRef · ...
GitHub
github.com › joker-eph › llvm-project-with-mlir › blob › master › mlir › g3doc › LangRef.md
llvm-project-with-mlir/mlir/g3doc/LangRef.md at master · joker-eph/llvm-project-with-mlir
Strided memrefs represent a view abstraction over preallocated data. They are constructed with special ops, yet to be introduced. Strided memrefs are a special subclass of memrefs with generic semi-affine map and correspond to a normalized memref descriptor when lowering to LLVM.
Author joker-eph
X
x.com › Si_Boehm › status › 1654393023441039360
Simon Boehm on X: "Oh and reading the LLVM langref it turns out llvm.fmuladd allows unfusion while llvm.fma will call libm if hardware FMA does not exist. libm should emulate the result of true FMA (single rounding)." / X
Oh and reading the LLVM langref it turns out llvm.fmuladd allows unfusion while llvm.fma will call libm if hardware FMA does not exist.
LLVM
reviews.llvm.org › D86233
⚙ D86233 [LangRef] Define mustprogress attribute
August 19, 2020 - LLVM IR currently assumes some form of forward progress. This form is not explicitly defined anywhere, and is the cause of miscompilations in most languages that are not C++11 or later. This implicit forward progress guarantee can not be opted out of on a function level nor on a loop level.