🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon aurora › pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing
5 days ago - For provisioned instances on Amazon Aurora, RDS Extended Support is priced per vCPU per hour. For Aurora Serverless, RDS Extended Support is priced per Aurora Capacity Unit (ACU) per hour consumed by your database. RDS Extended Support pricing is also dependent on AWS Region and the calendar date.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/aws › cost for an aurora cluster
r/aws on Reddit: Cost for an aurora cluster
March 12, 2024 -

Hello Experts,

We have one non prod DB cluster in aurora postgres. We are seeing the daily cost for the RDS instance is appearing as ~$300 even we perform no activity on that database. Is there any way to further dig down and see what all queries or functions inside the database is actually contributing to these ~300$ amount?

We were initially thinking if the database backup is costing so much as the database size is ~15TB and we have 7 days backup retention set. But the cost explorer showing the cost under service "backup" as ~$2 only per day. And what should be the backup retention should we set, as it seems its occupying full DB snap each day in the storage and setting the retention for longer period (~35days for e.g.) is going to cost us more?

Discussions

Aurora Serverless v2: Minimum Cost Setup for Development Environment
With Serverless v2, the hourly cost is somewhere like 12-20 cents per ACU per hour, depending on the AWS Region. You can check the price for each combination of AWS Region and Aurora database engine here: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ More on repost.aws
🌐 repost.aws
2
0
January 24, 2024
Aurora Serverless v2 vs RDS cost comparison?
Had a similar scenario, coworkers migrated to aurora serverless v2 since 1 month and we don't see any real issue so far. Cost definitely improved but we are still looking to understand the ACU consumption which is a bit higher than what we expected More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
17
22
February 4, 2023
RDS vs Aurora big price difference

Hello, PM for Amazon RDS and Aurora here.

We recommend Amazon Aurora Serverless for bursty workloads that spike up/down frequently. Think an e-commerce website which gets a lot of traffic on weekends and nothing on weekdays. Our customers love not having to scale the database to account for the surge or drop in traffic.

Amazon RDS and "regular" Amazon Aurora are for workloads that need sustained throughput. Think a search website which gets traffic throughout the day/week etc.

Hope that helps!

More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
49
48
August 28, 2018
Lambda + RDS Postgres - RDS Proxy - Aurora - Aurora Serverless - best practice
I suggest looking into use autoscaling fargate for this instead of lambda. I almost always use lambda, but for a heavy load + RDS access, fargate makes more sense IMO for cost, performance, and reliability. You could also start to leverage batch writes and reusable connections. Also, in postgres, be sure to use prepared statements to speed things up a lot More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
6
1
March 8, 2022
🌐
Vantage
vantage.sh › blog › aws-rds-vs-aurora-pricing-in-depth
RDS vs Aurora: A Detailed Pricing Comparison | Vantage
... Storage and IOPS 1TB = 1,000GB 1,000GB x $0.125 per GB-month = $125 storage 5,000 IOPS x $0.10 per IOPS-month = $500 IOPS · Instance Hours 730 hours x $1.92 price per hour = $1,401.60 instance hours
🌐
Pump
pump.co › home › blog › aws aurora pricing - cost breakdown & savings guide
AWS Aurora Pricing - Cost Breakdown & Savings Guide
Amazon Aurora has positioned itself as a leader in cloud databases by providing great scalability, performance, and availability at a very low price - 90% lower than traditional databases with similar functionalities. Consequently, if you are a startup, a small business, or simply a cloud engineer running enterprise systems, understanding Aurora's pricing structure becomes imperative.
🌐
CloudOptimo
cloudoptimo.com › home › blog › aws aurora vs rds: detailed comparison of amazon database services
AWS Aurora vs RDS: Detailed Comparison of Amazon Database Services
March 13, 2025 - Aurora's innovative architecture and features make it a compelling choice for organizations seeking a high-performance, scalable, and cost-effective database solution in the cloud. AWS Relational Database Service (RDS) is a fully managed cloud service that simplifies the setup, operation, and scaling of relational databases.
🌐
AWS
calculator.aws
AWS Pricing Calculator
AWS Pricing Calculator lets you explore AWS services, and create an estimate for the cost of your use cases on AWS.
🌐
TigerData
tigerdata.com › blog › amazon-aurora-vs-rds-understanding-the-difference
Amazon Aurora vs. RDS: Understanding the Difference
3 weeks ago - Like all AWS services, with RDS and Aurora, you only pay for what you use. Each service has numerous options that may increase price, such as storage amounts, proxy usage, etc. Knowing the I/O profile is also crucial since the savings can add up by choosing the appropriate I/O-optimized option.
Find elsewhere
🌐
CloudZero
cloudzero.com › home › blog › aurora vs. rds: choosing the best aws database solution
Aurora Vs. RDS: Choosing The Best AWS Database Solution
June 2, 2025 - You can compare prices and get advice on how to optimize your Amazon RDS on EC2 deployment. Picture this: Most cost tools will only show you what your total and average costs are, not precisely how much you spent on Amazon RDS on EC2 vs. Aurora costs, or the other different AWS DB services.
🌐
Bytebase
bytebase.com › blog › aws-aurora-vs-rds-pricing
AWS Aurora vs. RDS Pricing: A Detailed Comparison 2025
Reserved Instances: Similar to other AWS services, you can purchase Reserved Instances for Aurora to get a significant discount compared to On-Demand pricing in exchange for a one- or three-year commitment. RDS pricing also has several components, which can vary depending on the database engine you choose (e.g., MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server): Database Instance Hours: You pay an hourly rate for the database instances you run. The price depends on the instance type, database engine, and region.
🌐
CloudySave
cloudysave.com › aws › rds › amazon-aurora-pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing - CloudySave
February 15, 2021 - Amazon Aurora Pricing. The storage that you consume by using the Aurora database is going to get billed in for every GB-month increments and IOs consumed are going to get billed in for every
🌐
PlanetScale
planetscale.com › blog › amazon-aurora-pricing-the-many-surprising-costs-of-running-an-aurora-database
Amazon Aurora Pricing: The many surprising costs of running an Aurora database — PlanetScale
RDS Proxy will perform connection pooling as well to better manage the resources consumed by the compute nodes. In the case of a node outage, RDS Proxy can also more quickly detect the outage and redirect traffic to another node without dropping client connections. This is an additional service on top of Aurora and thus incurs an additional charge on your AWS bill.
Top answer
1 of 2
2
With Serverless v2, the hourly cost is somewhere like 12-20 cents per ACU per hour, depending on the AWS Region. You can check the price for each combination of AWS Region and Aurora database engine here: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ Let's consider us-east-1, which (as of January 2024) is 12 cents per ACU per hour. The minimum for Serverless v2 is 0.5 ACUs, so 6 cents / hour. A typical month has 720 hours (30 days) or 744 (31 days). So if you set minimum capacity to 0.5 ACUs, leave the cluster idle, and nothing unexpected happens, best case is roughly $43-45 per month for instance charges. Plus whatever usage-based charges for storage, I/O, and there are some other optional features that could result in charges. (That's why you would go through the exercise with the pricing calculator.) What could interfere with the best case? Turning on memory-consuming or CPU-consuming features could prevent the idle cluster from scaling down to 0.5 ACUs. Something like Performance Insights (minimum 2 ACUs) or global database (minimum 8 ACUs). Cleanup operations like PostgreSQL vacuum could run and cause scaling up when you think the database should be idle. What actions could you take to make the best case even better? Do "stop cluster" overnight or other long periods when you don't need to use the database. If you need to add reader instances to the cluster to test out multi-AZ usage (read/write splitting etc.), delete the reader instances when they're not needed. Have cron jobs to run stop-db-cluster, modify-db-cluster, etc. to put things into a cheaper state during overnight periods if you forget to do it at the end of the day.
2 of 2
0
Your best bet is to use AWS Calculator # https://calculator.aws/#/ in order to estimate the operating cost with the services that you plan to use. Secondly using the Graviton2 instances would save a lot compared with other instances. I have listed some common instance types that you may start using and then change later based on your project workload. t4g : For dev/test workload m6g : For general purpose workload r6g : For memory optimized workload Go with small storage initially and then you can scale it based on the need to optimize the cost.
🌐
DataCamp
datacamp.com › blog › rds-vs-aurora
Amazon RDS vs Aurora: Which is Right For Your Data Workload? | DataCamp
March 23, 2025 - The cost of using RDS or Aurora can vary significantly based on your specific workload requirements. Some applications prioritize low-cost solutions with moderate performance, while others demand high availability and scalability, justifying a higher price.
🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon aurora › amazon aurora dsql › pricing
Amazon Aurora DSQL Pricing
5 days ago - Amazon Aurora DSQL is the fastest serverless distributed SQL database with virtually unlimited scale, the highest availability, and zero infrastructure management. It automatically scales compute and storage to match your workload demands, so you only pay for what you use with no upfront costs.
🌐
Astera
astera.com › home › knowledge center › aurora vs. rds: which aws database is better in 2025?
Aurora vs. RDS: The Best AWS Database in 2025 | Astera
March 4, 2025 - One of the biggest differences between RDS and Aurora is that RDS is an overlay technology based on existing databases such as Oracle, MySQL, and Microsoft SQL Server, while Aurora is a separate option that has been built from the ground up by AWS.
🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › products › database › amazon rds
Managed Relational Database - Amazon RDS Pricing - Amazon Web Services
5 days ago - For provisioned instances on Amazon Aurora, RDS for MySQL, and RDS for PostgreSQL, RDS Extended Support is priced per vCPU per hour. For Aurora Serverless v2, RDS Extended Support is priced per Aurora Capacity Unit (ACU) per hour consumed by your database.
🌐
Cloudchipr
cloudchipr.com › blog › rds-pricing
The Ultimate Guide to AWS RDS Pricing: A Comprehensive Cost Breakdown 2025
We’ll examine how each database engine is priced, why two identically sized instances can bill very differently, and where storage choices quietly stack dollars over time. Real-world scenarios—from weekend prototypes to payment-heavy production clusters—show how to match configuration to need and sidestep surprise costs. When you drill into RDS Pricing, the first—and often largest—variable is the database engine itself ... AWS lets you pick from Amazon Aurora...
🌐
Bytebase
bytebase.com › blog › understanding-aws-aurora-pricing
Understanding AWS Aurora Pricing (2025)
April 30, 2025 - Priced at ~$0.12 per ACU-hour (US East - N. Virginia). Example Pricing – Aurora Standard (US East - N. Virginia, On-Demand): T-class instances may incur CPU credit charges when usage exceeds baseline.
🌐
Lumigo
lumigo.io › guides › aws serverless ecosystem › aurora serverless v2: why you need it, new features and pricing
Aurora Serverless v2: Why You Need It, New Features and Pricing
December 19, 2022 - The cost of Aurora Serverless v2 appears expensive, and while it is possible to save costs on your database for peak loads, it is not a cost-effective option for everyone. ... The price of Aurora capacity units (ACUs) in v2 ($0.12/hr) is twice ...