rhel 10 glibc version github

glibc.x86_64 and glibc.i686 on RHEL. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

GitHub

gist.github.com › wagenet › 35adca1a032cec2999d47b6c40aa45b1

glibc Versions - Gist - GitHub

glibc Versions. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Discussions

[Bug]: GLIBC version mismatch on Rocky/RHEL 9 (requires 2.35)

Checklist I am using an up-to-date version. I have read the documentation. I have searched existing issues. TagStudio Version Alpha v9.3.2 Operating System & Version Rocky Linux 9.4 Description Por... More on github.com

github.com

August 24, 2024

Glibc version in RHEL 10, or: how to save the 🌍 from mojibake - Fedora Discussion

Hey all TL;DR: I’d like to plead the case for the recently adopted-into-C2y N3366 to make it into RHEL 10, even though this is perhaps a hail mary operation. I’m opening this here because I don’t really know of a better place to start this discussion. But since RHEL essentially branches ... More on discussion.fedoraproject.org

discussion.fedoraproject.org

October 26, 2024

Python package requires GLIBC version 2.29 but RHEL 8 cannot support it; attempting to use gcc toolkit but need help

I am trying to use the open source python toolkit, "Aequitas" (GitHub - dssg/aequitas: Bias Auditing & Fair ML Toolkit). One of the functions from the package has a GLIBC-2.29 dependency that my Posit environment won't support (RHEL 8 can only support up to 2.28 (What glibc version is shipped ... More on forum.posit.co

forum.posit.co

July 29, 2024

VS Code 1.66 requires GLIBC 2.25 on RHEL 7

VS Code version: code-1.66.0-1648620680 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.9 Running yum update on RHEL 7 produces an error: Error: Package: code-1.66.0-1648620680.el7.x86_64 (code) Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.25)(64bit) According to https:/... More on github.com

github.com

March 31, 2022

GitHub

gist.github.com › richardlau › 6a01d7829cc33ddab35269dacc127680

Linux distributions to kernel and glibc versions map · GitHub

Linux distributions to kernel and glibc versions map - distro-kernel-glibc.md

GitHub

github.com › TagStudioDev › TagStudio › issues › 386

[Bug]: GLIBC version mismatch on Rocky/RHEL 9 (requires 2.35) · Issue #386 · TagStudioDev/TagStudio

August 24, 2024 - Failed to load Python shared library '/tmp/_MEIe8CWw8/libpython3.12.so.1.0': dlopen: /lib64/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.35' not found (required by /tmp/_MEIe8CWw8/libpython3.12.so.1.0)

Author TagStudioDev

Red Hat

docs.redhat.com › en › documentation › red_hat_enterprise_linux › 7 › html › 7.0_release_notes › sect-red_hat_enterprise_linux-7.0_release_notes-compiler_and_tools-glibc

10.2. GLIBC | 7.0 Release Notes | Red Hat Enterprise Linux | 7 | Red Hat Documentation

In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, the glibc libraries (libc, libm, libpthread, NSS plug-ins, and others) are based on the glibc 2.17 release, which includes numerous enhancements and bug fixes relative to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 equivalent.

Fedora Discussion

discussion.fedoraproject.org › project discussion

Glibc version in RHEL 10, or: how to save the 🌍 from mojibake - Fedora Discussion

October 26, 2024 - Hey all TL;DR: I’d like to plead the case for the recently adopted-into-C2y N3366 to make it into RHEL 10, even though this is perhaps a hail mary operation. I’m opening this here because I don’t really know of a better place to start this discussion. But since RHEL essentially branches off from Fedora at some point, it’s a necessary precondition to get it into Fedora anyway – though I have no idea if the decision where to branch off RHEL 10 has already been made (and if so, I assume it cannot...

Red Hat

access.redhat.com › solutions › 38634

What glibc version is shipped with a particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux? - Red Hat Customer Portal

December 2, 2025 - What glibc version is shipped with a particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux update or minor release? We need a later GNU C library for our project but we cannot find it from Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Is there any document about glibc version information?

GitHub

gist.github.com › jcelerier › 8cd9a35994b0f15380b3070d40b6aabc

glibc Versions · GitHub

List of oldest supported version of top 10 Linux Distros and their glibc version according to distrowatch.com.

Xpack-dev-tools

xpack-dev-tools.github.io › xpack-build-box › docs › end-of-support

End-of-support schedule | XBB - The xPack Build Box

February 21, 2025 - registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7 - GLIBC 2.17, 2012-2019 (2024), kernel 3.10 <-- XBB v3.3

Find elsewhere

Google Bing Mojeek

Posit Community

forum.posit.co › posit professional & hosted products

Python package requires GLIBC version 2.29 but RHEL 8 cannot support it; attempting to use gcc toolkit but need help - Posit Professional & Hosted Products - Posit Community

July 29, 2024 - I am trying to use the open source ... package has a GLIBC-2.29 dependency that my Posit environment won't support (RHEL 8 can only support up to 2.28 (What glibc version is shipped ......

Tenable

tenable.com › plugins › nessus › 242114

RHEL 10 : glibc (RHSA-2025:11066) | Tenable®

July 15, 2025 - Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Red Hat Enterprise Linux security advisory. Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number. Update the RHEL glibc package based on the guidance in RHSA-2025:11066.

GitHub

github.com › microsoft › vscode › issues › 146390

VS Code 1.66 requires GLIBC 2.25 on RHEL 7 · Issue #146390 · microsoft/vscode

March 31, 2022 - VS Code version: code-1.66.0-1648620680 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.9 Running yum update on RHEL 7 produces an error: Error: Package: code-1.66.0-1648620680.el7.x86_64 (code) Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.25)(64bit) According to https:/...

Author microsoft

GitHub

github.com › mattermost › desktop › issues › 3353

[Bug]: RHEL 8 cannot run v5.11 due to missing GLIBC 2.29 · Issue #3353 · mattermost/desktop

February 24, 2025 - This issue reproduces on the most recent stable version, or the most recent prerelease version of the Mattermost Desktop App. I have read the contribution guidelines. mattermost-desktop-5.11.0-1.x86_64 Won't run on Red Hat 8.10 Due to GLIBC

Author mattermost

Super User

superuser.com › questions › 18078 › which-versions-of-glibc-do-different-versions-of-redhat-ship-with

Which versions of glibc do different versions of RedHat ship with? - Super User

Top answer

1 of 2

DistroWatch typically has a pretty good run down of what each distro has.

Red Hat's run down

2 of 2

Edit: The RedHat documentation used to list the version of the libraries they included. They have since removed that information.

This data is from distrowatch. Sorry for the sideways scroll and long ASCII text. StackOverflow doesn't support Markdown Tables.

| Package       | RHEL-8.4  | RHEL-7.9  | RHEL-6.9  | RHEL-5.11 | RHEL-4.8  | RHEL-3.9  | RHEL-2.1  | 9         | 8.0       | 7.3       | 7.2       | 7.1       | 7.0       | 6.2   | 6.1       | 6.0       | 5.2       | 5.1       | 5.0       | 4.2       |
|               |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | shrike    | psyche    | valhalla  | enigma    | seawolf   | guiness   | zoot  | cartman   | hedwig    | apollo    | manhattan | hurricane | biltmore  |
| glibc (2.34)  | 2.28      | 2.17      | 2.12      | 2.5       | 2.3.4     | 2.3.2     | 2.2.4     | 2.3.2     | 2.2.93    | 2.2.5     | 2.2.4     | 2.2.2     | 2.1.92    | 2.1.3 | 2.1.2     | 2.1.1     | 2.0.7     | 2.0.7     | 2.0.5c    | --        |

It used to be available from RedHat documentation: RHEL 6 RHEL 7

reddit.com › r/redhat › is it possible to install older glibc (from rhel7) on rhel 8?

r/redhat on Reddit: Is it possible to install older glibc (from Rhel7) on rhel 8?

May 21, 2023 -

Hello everyone,

Is there a safe way to install older glibc on redhat 8 so I can get legacy applications that support older rhel 7 to run?

I was able to install the older rpm into a second directory, but when I tried to launch the application, it didn't use that glibc. If I try to ld_library_path, it breaks everything else since, of course, rhel 8 uses newer system glibc. Is there a way around this? Or do I need to use chroot or container of centos7?

Thanks

Top answer

1 of 7

Using one container is the best option for that, build one using RHEL7 image and you are good to go.

2 of 7

Install glib-compat. Note that this is only supported minimally, but it exists. And the -compat for 9 is RHEL8’s, and so forth. And it doesn’t help if you depend on other libraries, like openssl. But, really, use a container is the better solution. And even then you have 13 months unless you like paying ELS.

GitHub

github.com › Microsoft › napajs › issues › 192

Error: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found on RED-Hat(RHEL-6.5) Linux · Issue #192 · microsoft/napajs

February 8, 2018 - I’m using node module napajs on RED-Hat(RHEL-6.5) Linux machine. On Linux machine, node version is 6.10.0 and gcc version is 4.4.7. I wrote a simple node program using napajs module. When I execute this program, first I faced GLIBC-2.14 library issue.

Author microsoft

reddit.com › r/redhat › glibc error

r/redhat on Reddit: Glibc Error

January 28, 2025 -

I’m trying to update a RHEL 8 machine with dnf and I’m getting a dependency error for glibc-2.28-251.el8_10.11.i686

It needs glibc-common-2.28-251.el8_10.11.i686.

If I browse Red Hat’s baseos repository, I don’t see it in there. Do you think maybe it hasn’t been added yet or do I have something else wrong? Thanks,

Top answer

1 of 3

2 of 3

dnf repoquery --requires glibc.i686 says it needs glibc-common with a matching version-release, but doesn't specify the arch. AFAICS, glibc-common.x86_64 should work fine here, and it does install for me in a container, at least.

GitHub

gist.github.com › xuyang2 › 3ab29d04ca47738d59fac5647d9bf0e9

glibc-versions.md · GitHub

glibc-versions.md · see · https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Glibc Timeline · https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos · https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redhat · https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=sle · https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=debian ·

Stack Overflow

stackoverflow.com › questions › 32316707 › rhel-6-how-to-install-glibc-2-14-or-glibc-2-15

dependencies - RHEL 6 - how to install 'GLIBC_2.14' or 'GLIBC_2.15'? - Stack Overflow

Top answer

1 of 4

This often occurs when you build software in RHEL 7 and try to run on RHEL 6.

To update GLIBC to any version, simply download the package from

https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libc/

For example glibc-2.14.tar.gz in your case.

1. tar xvfz glibc-2.14.tar.gz
2. cd glibc-2.14
3. mkdir build
4. cd build
5. ../configure --prefix=/opt/glibc-2.14
6. make
7. sudo make install
8. export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/glibc-2.14/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Then try to run your software, glibc-2.14 should be linked.

2 of 4

Naive question: Is it possible to somehow download GLIBC 2.15, put it in any folder (e.g. /tmp/myglibc) and then point to this path ONLY when executing something that needs this specific version of glibc?

Yes, it's possible.

reddit.com › r/redhat › upgrading glibc to version 2.39 from 2.34 on red hat ubi 9

Upgrading glibc to Version 2.39 from 2.34 on Red Hat UBI 9 : r/redhat

December 10, 2024 - If you gut UBI to bring all of ... easier to use Fedora 40/41 (or CentOS Stream 10) as container base until RHEL 10 is released, then you can use UBI 10....