Folks my main use case is product development, deep market research, and product strategy. I code a good chunk myself but use AI for that as well. Have been a GPTPro user so far but thinking of switching to the much hyped Gemini 3.0 on the Ultra tier.
Those who have access to these top paid plans, which models do you generally prefer? Also mention your use case as well.
Thank you
Videos
Gemini vs. ChatGPT: Which is better?
ChatGPT vs Gemini: Which is more accurate?
Which is more user-friendly, ChatGPT or Gemini?
With Google launching their premium subscription tier, anyone else feel a bit let down by chatgpt pro?
The performance on benchmarks wipes the floor with o3, plus with all available tools and google space integration, there is no way for openai to catch up is there?
Anw given that gemini pro (the 20 bucks) subscription competes well with chatgpt pro for everything I've tried so far, I can only imagine how good the premium will be. Currently awaiting international rollout to make the switch
So I quite simply put in a bunch of articles and Reddit posts and comments (sorry guys) into ChatGPT (cost Gemini didn't do this very well) and asked it to list out all the features mentioned and compare how each AI performs.... do you agree?
Summary and Recommendations
-
For Creative Writing: Choose Gemini Ultra for its superior capabilities.
-
For Coding: It's a tie; consider your need for advanced code or fewer mistakes.
-
For General Use: Gemini Ultra shines with speed and human-like interactions; GPT-4 offers broader language support and better OCR capabilities.
Comparison: Gemini Ultra vs GPT-4
Aspect Comparison
| Aspect | Gemini Ultra | GPT-4 | Winner/Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | On par with GPT-4, wins some tests, loses others | On par with Gemini, wins some tests, loses others | Tie |
| Coding | Provides more advanced code with better explanation but has limitations | Makes fewer mistakes, can be "lazier" | Tie |
| Hallucination | Less hallucination with search involved | Hallucinates less without search | Tie |
| Creative Writing | Far better at creative writing | Less capable in creative writing compared to Gemini | Ultra Win |
| Translation | Significantly better translation quality | Lesser in translation quality compared to Gemini | Ultra Win |
| Text Summarization | Better at summarization but shorter context | Longer context but not as concise as Gemini | Ultra Win/Tie |
| General Conversations | More human-like and intelligent | Less human-like compared to Gemini | Ultra Win |
| Speed | At least 3 times faster compared to GPT-4-Turbo | Slower compared to Gemini Ultra | Ultra Win |
| Message Cap | No message cap | Has message cap | Ultra Win |
| Task Refusal | Refuses to do tasks more compared to GPT-4 | More compliant in performing tasks | GPT-4 Win |
| Language & Modality | English only, multi-modal aspects not enabled yet | Supports more languages and has more plugins like Code Interpreter | GPT-4 Win for Now |
| Image Generation | Realistic images but lacks the creative prompt improvement of DALL-E 3 | More sophisticated and creative images with DALL-E 3 | Depends on preference |
| OCR & Image Recognition | Struggles with OCR and image recognition, relies on Google Lens | More capable in OCR and image recognition tasks | GPT-4 Win |
| Mobile App Availability | No mobile app | Availability of mobile apps and broader ecosystem integration | GPT-4 Win |
I can’t figure out what all of the hype about Gemini is over chat gpt is. I would like some one to explain in a quantifiable sense why they think Gemini is better. I can understand an argument that Gemini doesn’t talk to you the same way chat GPT does but it really is a different brand of toothpaste. It seems to me that google has a competent and comparable product but I honestly can’t figure out what the hype is about. What I mostly use an AI for is deep research and how to read and make sense of documents such as how to shop for health insurance. I don’t program anything beyond a couple simple functions with a raspberry pi.
Disclaimer: I posted the exact question in the other major subs as well. Trying to see if others have a similar use cases like below.
If money is not limitations and I am a not a developer but some interesting in between where I built small apps with a lot of pain, and used vibe coding, what is the benefits of subscribing to all three highest tiers of the current leaders? So ChatGPT Pro is 200 a month. You get access to codex, Sora,. And gpt 5 Pro, and almost never hit limits . Claude Max x20 at 200 a month, get a very high rate limits using opus and sonnet overall (thinking on upgrading as I am hitting the limits of x5). And Gemini ultra at 250 a month you get access to all their apps, beta access to new features, an integration to whole their suits of apps, etc,
So as a vibe coder what can you do, and does anyone here does that where they connect all the services together and word them in tandem to produce some phenomenal results.
Again, no need to say it's too expensive. Money here is not the issue. I'll even shill total of $1000 a month if my productivity goes to the moon, which in essence means you will most likely be better at almost every aspect of your job which for non-developer you are a hea dog the curve in any aspect of corporate office job. In other words, if I can translate a salary increase and personal development improvement, working on your own projects and work projects and just be better, this is a fraction of what you pay "professionals" do the things or teach you things.
So does it really worth it, and if it does, what is the hypothetical use cases you see that can achieved having all three under your belt.
Which of the two would you pick and why? Or do you try to get both?