Seems like this should do the trick:

var objectA = {
    propertyA: 1,
    propertyB: 2,
    .
    . // more properties here
    .
    propertyM: 13
};

var objectB = {
    propertyN: 14,
    propertyO: 15,
    .
    . // more properties here
    .
    propertyZ: 26
};

var objectC = {...objectA, ...objectB}; // this is the answer

var a = objectC.propertyA;

var n = objectC.propertyN;

Based on this article: https://blog.mariusschulz.com/2016/12/23/typescript-2-1-object-rest-and-spread

In addition, the order of the variables in the decomposition matters. Consider the following:

var objectA = {
    propertyA: 1,
    propertyB: 2, // same property exists in objectB
    propertyC: 3
};

var objectB = {
    propertyX: 'a',
    propertyB: 'b', // same property exists in objectA
    propertyZ: 'c'
};

// objectB will override existing properties, with the same name,
// from the decomposition of objectA
var objectC = {...objectA, ...objectB}; 

// result: 'b'
console.log(objectC.propertyB); 

// objectA will override existing properties, with the same name,
// from the decomposition of objectB
var objectD = {...objectB, ...objectA}; 

// result: '2'
console.log(objectD.propertyB); 

With Underscore.js, to merge an array of objects do:

var arrayOfObjects = [ {a:1}, {b:2, c:3}, {d:4} ];
_(arrayOfObjects).reduce(function(memo, o) { return _(memo).extend(o); });

It results in:

Object {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4}