How accurate are AI detectors?

reddit.com › r › writers › comments › 1jzd3wy › how_accurate_are_ai_detectors

Not at all Answer from Professional-Mail857 on reddit.com

reddit.com › r/writers › how accurate are ai detectors?

r/writers on Reddit: How accurate are AI detectors?

April 14, 2025 -

I had to do an analysis on a fairytale, jack and the bean stalk and my teacher said my report sounded too formal and ran it through an AI detector, saying that 80% of it was likely AI. But the thing is, the AI was counting the questions which I stated and had to answer. I tried to disprove him saying that I didn't cheat, because I went ahead and plugged my essay into 4 other different kinds of AI detectors, all saying different things from 0 to 40%, meaning that AI is not a definitive way to show the proof of a students work.

zero percent accurate.

reddit.com › r/professors › can someone here please tell me what is the best free ai detector that actually works/ if there isn't one: are your colleges helping fund it?

r/Professors on Reddit: Can someone here PLEASE tell me what is the best FREE AI Detector that actually works/ if there isn't one: are your colleges helping fund it?

March 30, 2025 - AI research is my field. My opinion is that there is not currently, nor is there likely to be, an AI detector with sufficient accuracy to be considered either necessary or sufficient evidence to accuse a student of using AI.

reddit.com › r/seo › which is the best ai detection tool or website?

r/SEO on Reddit: Which is the best AI detection tool or website?

January 18, 2025 -

Hi everyone, can anyone help me with the best free AI detector tool in content?

There are no accurate AI detectors, free or paid. Why do you want one?

They're all terrible so far. I've written articles completely from scratch, run them through detectors, and they've come up as AI-generated. I'm hoping there's a breakthrough in the near future. We're still in the early stages of advanced LLMs, so there's hope.

reddit.com › r/writingwithai › best ai checker – which one actually works?

r/WritingWithAI on Reddit: Best AI Checker – Which One Actually Works?

February 12, 2025 -

I’ve tested several AI content detection tools extensively, evaluating them based on accuracy, ease of use, reliability, and additional features. Some tools are better suited for academic purposes, while others work well for content creators and businesses. Here’s my detailed breakdown:

🔍 1. PerfectEssayWriter.ai – Most Accurate & Detailed Analysis

✅ Why I Recommend It:

Highly accurate in detecting AI-generated text, including content from ChatGPT, GPT-4, and other AI models.
Provides detailed breakdowns of flagged content, making it easier to understand why something was marked as AI-generated.
Ideal for students, educators, and professionals who need a reliable AI checker.

📝 2. MyEssayWriter.ai – User-Friendly & Effective

✅ Why I Recommend It:

One of the most user-friendly AI detectors I’ve tested.
Provides clear AI detection reports with easy-to-read results.
Works well for academic writing, helping students and teachers verify originality.

🎓 3. GPTZero – Best for Educators & Researchers

✅ Why I Recommend It:

Designed specifically for teachers and researchers to detect AI-generated essays.
Provides a perplexity and burstiness score to assess writing patterns.
Works well but may flag some human-written text incorrectly.

🏆 4. Originality.ai – Best for Content Creators & Businesses

✅ Why I Recommend It:

Detects AI-generated text and checks for plagiarism in one scan.
Great for bloggers, SEO writers, and content marketers.
Paid tool, but offers detailed insights into AI vs. human-written content.

🤖 5. Copyleaks AI Detector – Decent, But Inconsistent

✅ Why I Recommend It:

Can detect AI-generated text, including ChatGPT and Bard outputs.
Provides a sentence-level analysis of AI probability.
However, results can be inconsistent—sometimes over-detects AI content.

✍️ 6. Writer.com AI Content Detector – Quick, But Less Reliable

✅ Why I Recommend It:

Great for quick AI detection scans.
Simple and easy-to-use interface.
Not as accurate as other tools, so I wouldn’t rely on it alone.

Final Thoughts

If you need the most accurate AI content detection tool, I highly recommend PerfectEssayWriter.ai for its detailed analysis and reliability. MyEssayWriter.ai is another great option if you prefer a user-friendly experience.

Which AI checker do you use? Have you found any that work better? Let’s discuss below! 👇

I've utilized a pair of these (GPTZero was inconsistent for me), but truly, AI detectors can only proceed so far, particularly when the importance is great such as with scholarly material. I once had a document flagged simply because it "seemed too polished". Following that disarray, I quit taking chances and began getting assistance from LeoEssays . They genuinely compose everything anew, so I have never encountered problems with AI identification methods. The advantage? It is organized correctly, novel, and does not read as though it originated from an automated system. If you aim to bypass AI alerts yet still obtain excellent output, they represent a much more secure option than attempting to expertly manipulate the detectors.

My real writing gets flagged so I have to use ai to create “100% human content”

reddit.com › r/datarecoveryhelp › ai detector

r/DataRecoveryHelp on Reddit: AI Detector

June 17, 2025 -

So, I’ve got a lot of positive feedback about my recent post Humanize AI. Reddit users seem to enjoy reading the truth and not just promo. Besides, that’s my actual hobby - apart from data recovery. That’s why I decided to write a decent tutorial about AI writing detectors (AI Content Checkers) and review the best ones like: GPTZero, ZeroGPT, Turnitin AI Checker, Grammarly AI Checker, Quillbot AI Checker, Scribbr AI Detector, and others. We’ll do a real test to see if they’re fake or not and whether it’s possible to bypass AI detectors nowadays. I even generated a ChatGPT image using the latest model for this post. Let’s go!

Here are the 11 best and most popular (not sure best) AI checkers I want to test: (How did I check popularity? I simply used SEO tools to estimate their traffic and sorted them by that. If any AI detectors are missing here, it’s because they don’t work, users don’t like them, or they’re not investing in marketing, haha, so… sorry!) If you want to avoid high detection and humanize ai content - read my tutorial How to Humanize AI & Best AI humanizers Best AI Humanizers with proofs reviewed here: https://www.reddit.com/r/DataRecoveryHelp/comments/1oqwdib/best_ai_humanizer 🎁 If you need to Humanize AI right away try this: https://aihumanizer.net - 100% Free Ai humanizer (nice human score in ZeroGPT & GPTZero, simple language) https://www.zerogpt.com/ - ZeroGPT Checker (My top choice. Easy to fool when you rewrite content in a conversational style.) https://gptzero.me/ - GPTZero AI Detector (Very inconsistent results. Since the September update it has become unstable - some texts score 0%, others 100% AI, with no clear logic.) https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector - Quillbot AI Checker (Works fairly well. Can be fooled by using natural language and avoiding a rigid, formal tone.) https://www.scribbr.com/ai-detector/ - Scribbr AI Detector (Just an iframe of Quillbot’s checker.) https://www.grammarly.com/ai-detector - Grammarly AI Checker (Very weak detector, easy to trick.) Less popular AI detectors: https://originality.ai/ai-checker Originality AI Checker (Feels scammy. Almost always shows 100% AI, but if you add intentional errors it marks them as human. Very odd.) https://undetectable.ai/ Undetectable AI Detector https://decopy.ai/ai-detector/ Decopy AI Detector https://notegpt.io/ai-detector NoteGPT AI Detector https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector Copyleaks AI Detector https://gowinston.ai/ Winston AI Detector I would not review each pros and cons and plans intentionally. Who cares? You can look yourself. I will only get scores before and after and share with you. Reddit allows you to attach only one image per post, so, sorry! What AI detector do colleges & students use? It’s definitely Turnitin AI Checker. There’s no free way to check it without registration. I tried, and it asked whether I’m a student, instructor, or teaching assistant. I didn’t want to lie, so I quit. But I’ve read a lot of Reddit discussions, and both students and teachers give the same answer to the question: “How accurate is Turnitin AI Detector?” The simple answer: Not accurate. Haha! Lots of false positives and easy to manipulate with special prompts. Ok let’s do a simple test of the rest popular best AI detectors and checkers: For this test, I’ll generate a simple essay titled “What is an AI Detector and How Do They Work?” (500 words). Then I’ll show you the score before and after some basic humanization using simple prompts.I’m intentionally skipping web-based AI humanizer tools because I already covered those in this tutorial.I’ll use ChatGPT 4.1 Mini – fast and cheap. I assume a lot of writers and students might be using this specific model.

What is the most accurate AI detector & how does an AI detector work? I have a short answer for you already: not even close to accurate! Because there’s no single algorithm that can make a text 100% AI or 100% human. It’s all about patterns. But those patterns are often what real people use too. Besides, you can easily create a prompt that breaks the patterns. OK, let me give you a basic understanding of how an AI detector actually works: Think of it this way - when an AI writes, it tends to be super predictable and efficient with its word choices. It’s like a really smart, but sometimes boring, student who always picks the most statistically probable answer. Humans, on the other hand, are messy! We use quirky phrasing, vary our sentence lengths, and sometimes throw in unexpected words or even make “mistakes” that an AI wouldn’t. AI Detectors with Their Own Model AI detectors look for these differences: Perplexity: How "surprising" the next word is. Humans tend to have higher perplexity because we're less predictable. Burstiness: The variation in sentence length and structure. Human writing is like a rollercoaster. AI writing can be more like a flat road. Repetition: AIs might repeat phrases or structures more often. Stylometry: They analyze things like average sentence length, vocabulary richness, and even punctuation habits. They then feed all this data into a machine learning model, which has been trained to recognize the "fingerprints" of AI versus human writing. It spits out a score indicating the likelihood of AI involvement. AI Checkers Using Other Model APIs Some fake AI detectors don’t have their own model at all. All they do is ask another AI whether the text looks like it was written by AI or not. It’s a very expensive method (because you pay API credits every time) but literally very cheap to develop. All you have to do is choose the cheapest API and get results instantly. But here’s the catch - I tried this tactic, and it gave me about +-50% accuracy, haha! That’s crazy! That’s why I’m sure you’ve noticed the same content sometimes gives you a different score over and over again. Here’s another example: some AI detectors use their own basic scripts - like checking whether the content has a closed em dash or not, or if there’s phrasing like “dive in,” “in the digital era,” or “digital landscape.” If they find these words or combinations, they simply mark the content as 90% AI. Stupid? Oh yes! Are AI Detectors Reliable? I’ve tested a bunch of AI detectors, and here’s the deal: none are 100% reliable, not even 85%. Even the best ones only hit about 70–85% accuracy – and that’s in perfect conditions. Free tools often do worse. False Alarms Happen Sometimes, detectors flag real human writing as AI. This is especially true for non-native English speakers or overly structured writing. I’ve seen stuff like the U.S. Constitution get marked as AI! They Miss Stuff Too On the flip side, newer AI like GPT-4.1 can often slip by undetected, especially if the text has been edited a bit. So yeah, AI-written content can fool detectors more than you’d expect.

reddit.com › r/umgc › ai detector accuracy

r/UMGC on Reddit: AI Detector accuracy

August 17, 2024 -

I am at a loss here. For background, I am not an English native speaker. Writing in English has always been a bit awkward for me. Grammarly and Quillbot have been a blessing.

The issue I am having is this. I am writing an analysis for my first assignment. I wrote the whole thing. I obviously paraphrased from the source material. I got curious and put it through Quillbot's AI detector. Imagine my surprise when it said that it is 100% AI generated. Once I put it through Quillbot paraphraser, it lowered it to 58% AI generated.

I don't know what to do here. Beyond lowering my own standards of grammar, which I am not going to do, I am afraid that a professor might think I am cheating.

Is there anybody else having this issue or experienced this? Am I overthinking this?

I just want to make sure I understand this. It said that your write was 100% generated, but then when you used the tool to generate a paraphrasing of your own text it said it was now only 58% generated? Seems a bit backward to me. To answer your question, none of the current AI detectors are any good at all. Just do your own work, and if it is ever questioned, there are plenty of articles that you can use to fight your case.

This is very typical for non-native English speakers. One reason being that we (ESL student here as well) do not use the same vocabulary as US high school attendees. I believe there are SAT related terms that AI detectors look for, as an example. Those of us that did not spend years preparing for SATs, are not going to score high in that department, leading to a "red flag". The detectors are exceptionally poor at detecting AI generated work. This is well known and therefor faculty are not supposed to use these tools. They use turnitin. I am a native German speaker. I will be graduating in the fall of 25. I have not had a single doubt regarding the validity of my essays, etc. Simply keep your drafts and outlines you produced while composing your analysis, and you will be fine. That will be sufficient evidence that you provided your own work. Keep up your hard work. It's normal to be worried, just talk to your professor about it.

reddit.com › r/copywriting › what's the best ai detector tool?

r/copywriting on Reddit: What's the best AI Detector tool?

September 6, 2025 -

Hey everybody, what's the best AI Detector that you guys use to check your content and make sure there is no ChatGPT?

Edit: Thanks for the info. I didn’t expect a negative feedback to the ai detectors topic but really good to know.

honestly there’s no "best" ai detector bc they all mess up sometimes, even the big names like gptzero or turnitin can throw false positives. what i usually do is run my draft thru a detector just to see what it spits out, then smooth it out a bit. lately ive been using walterwrites ai to humanize my text so it looks more natural and doesn’t trip stuff as much. not foolproof but fwiw it makes me feel way less paranoid when i submit stuff

AI detector tools are unreliable, because they themselves rely on AI! I've heard multiple stories of people who put historical texts into AI detectors and the detectors said those texts were AI-generated, lol. So there's no reason to use an AI detector. Clients sometimes don't understand this, sadly. Fortunately, I haven't had this experience, but many other writers have been falsely accused by clients of using AI because an AI detector said so, and the client believed the AI detector.

reddit.com › r/phd › best ai detector ? most reliable one?

r/PhD on Reddit: Best AI detector ? Most reliable one?

March 6, 2025 -

So I am wrapping my dissertation and want to make sure it is not flagged as AI. I have gotten in trouble before (although it was my own mistake and luckily not a part of my main project), however, I am very cautious and careful now and not using AI. However, even things like Grammarly and Word editing can be AI flagged now.

Has anyone tried a reliable detector and can suggest any?

I like Proofademic AI, it is the best AI detector and is quite accurate and most reliable one, I've ever used.

There is no such thing as a "reliable" detector.

reddit.com › r/seo › how reliable are ai content detection tools?

r/SEO on Reddit: How Reliable Are AI Content Detection Tools?

October 22, 2024 -

I tried zeroGPT but have doubts about its accuracy. Do you have experience with any AI detection tools?

No AI tool is 100% correct. I have tried ZeroGPT, contentatscale, Copyleaks, Quetext and more. Many have false positives. Some even detected my old written content from 7 years ago as AI lol, which is hilarious. So, based on that, now I don't give a shit about detection lol. I mainly focus on the quality, user-focussed content and SEO. If a content is ok on the basis of these three factors, then its good to go. I have tested it as well and got pretty good results.

We're using AI for blogging and if you just use ChatGPT they will probably 100% detect content as AI generated. But there are many false positives. But if you use some advanced prompting or prompt chaining, AI detectors won't work at all. Currently we're testing Emplibot for content creation and the results are "interesting". You're essentially better off by tossing a coin instead of using an "AI detector". TL;DR: AI detection tools are mostly useless IMO.

Find elsewhere

Google Bing Mojeek

reddit.com › r/chatgpt › which ai content detector is reliable

r/ChatGPT on Reddit: Which AI content detector is Reliable

June 2, 2023 -

Which AI content detector is Reliable

I checked with 3 different sites. One says no AI generation, the second one says 30% and the last one says 75% AI generated content detected.

None of them. I would testify in court to that fact. There's a 0% probability of success. It is literally an AI just pulling nonsense out of its ass and someone selling it. I can make an AI content detector that will beat or match any on the market and that means nothing.

After testing a lot of AI detector, ZeroGPT.com is the best and most accurate one.

reddit.com › r/ubc › how accurate are ai detectors?

r/UBC on Reddit: How accurate are AI detectors?

3 weeks ago -

Why is my essay getting flagged I'm scared to hand it in 😭

Try not to panic, AI detectors are super inaccurate and flag a ton of false positives. If you wrote it yourself don't be scared to hand it in. Keep your drafts or notes as backup proof just in case. Some of us even run our work through humanizing ai tools, free ones like clever ai humanizer, to avoid false flags from unreliable detectors, but honestly if you genuinely wrote it you should be fine. Most profs are starting to realize these detectors aren't reliable enough to base grades on. What percentage is it showing? And did you use any AI at all for editing or grammar? That context matters too.

Severely inaccurate.

reddit.com › r/chatgptpromptgenius › most accurate ai detector in 2025?

r/ChatGPTPromptGenius on Reddit: most accurate AI detector in 2025?

2 weeks ago -

I’ve been testing a bunch of AI detectors lately and the results are all over the place. The same paragraph gets marked as “mostly human” on one site and “almost fully AI” on another. I tried a mix of free tools and paid ones, but I honestly can’t tell which, if any, are actually reliable.

For people who use these more often, is there a detector that feels even somewhat consistent? Or are they all just guessing in different ways?

no detector is truly accurate.,. but originality at least explains why it flags certain lines, while the others just slap a percentage on it.

I’ve tried GPTZero, ZeroGPT, and Originality AI and honestly none of them agree. Originality AI feels the most consistent on reruns though, which is more than I can say for the others.

reddit.com › r/artificialinteligence › how reliable are ai detectors?

r/ArtificialInteligence on Reddit: How reliable are AI detectors?

August 21, 2025 -

I've been writing essays for a USA school exchange program, which strictly forbids AI or any additional help. I have NOT used any AI writers, the only tool that I have used is Grammarly, just to correct my grammar, yet when I put it into an AI detector like Zerogpt, it came out as 100% AI, and my second essay came out at 80% AI likely, despite not using any ai tools to help myself with writing. But other detectors like Quillbot or the Grammarly AI detector showed that my writing was 100% human.

They’re useless.

In my experience they are super unreliable. I once put parts of my masters thesis into one of those detecors for the lols. Apparently it was 80% Ai generated. Which is quite funny, as generative Ai didn't exist when I wrote it.

reddit.com › r/artificialinteligence › what is a trustworthy ai-detection tool?

r/ArtificialInteligence on Reddit: What is a trustworthy AI-detection tool?

May 5, 2024 -

I am currently writing my bachelors thesis and discovered earlier today that one of my colleages had used Generative AI systems to produce large pieces of text. I discovered this by using available online AI-detection tools. The colleage in question says that everything will be rewritten but I want to make sure. Our university has put forward strict rules about this and using AI in this way will be considered plagiarism. Therefore, my question: What tool will give me the best detection of AI generated text? Are these free online tools to be trusted or is there a certain degree of error?

There is none, they are all scams. It is not possible to detect AI generated text. Please do some research. Also, please do not use AI to get your college degree.... https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+detectors+are+scams

There is no foolproof method of detecting ai generated content. Many of the online tools are just checking for words and phrases often used by certain ai. If you happen to use the same phrase in your text, then the detection tools will say it's ai generated. Don't trust online tools. Just accepting AI is now something people will use, and trusting people to read the generated content and alter it to be their own work is the best you can do for now.

reddit.com › r/artificialinteligence › are ai-content detectors ever going to be reliable?

r/ArtificialInteligence on Reddit: Are AI-Content detectors ever going to be reliable?

April 26, 2024 -

I wanna start off by saying I don't use full AI paragraphs in my essays because I'm more or less fearful of getting suspended or whatever penalties my college has for it, but I do use it to get ideas and help me get started on essays.

The title question comes from me putting my essay into Copyleaks's plagiarism checker and deciding to see if the AI detector was as reliable as their other stuff that I use. After it detected there was no AI, I noticed my title was still in the text box. After I removed it and ran it again it detected that it was 100% AI just after removing the words "Global History Essay 2". I started to think about how even with a supposedly "multiple third-party study supported" AI content detector, a few words can literally make it go from 0 to 100, instantly.

Is AI the detection colleges have access to somehow better or should I be fearful of being falsely accused of using AI and having no real way to prove otherwise?

The images are partially blacked out because the subject my essay is about is controversial and I'm not here to start arguments or get advice on my work, I kinda just need to know about the AI detection stuff.

Copyleak results: https://imgur.com/a/d15S2iP

I'm quite sure ai detectors won't ever be reliable. After using ai people can paraphrase content themselves or use tools like netus,ai or other bypassers that are always improving. So I don't see a way that detectors ever going to be even moderately accurate

In longer bodies of text you can do it by tallying all of the words and sentence lengths and seeing if the tendencies match an existing AI model. Human editing completely removes that approach.

reddit.com › r/humanizeaiwriting › what is the best ai detection tool in 2025? (accuracy, false positives, real tests)

r/humanizeAIwriting on Reddit: What Is the Best AI Detection Tool in 2025? (Accuracy, False Positives, Real Tests)

3 weeks ago -

I’ve been using Proofademic AI as my main AI detector lately because it’s consistently the most reliable on real academic writing, essays, research responses, and longer assignments. It also gives clearer section-level flags instead of just a scary percentage. After seeing that performance, I went down the rabbit hole comparing what people call the “best AI detection tool” in 2025.

The short version: there isn’t a single perfect AI detector, but there are tools that are meaningfully better depending on your use case. Independent comparisons show big gaps in accuracy and false positives across detectors, especially on hybrid or edited AI text.

What “best AI detector” really means in 2025

Most high-quality AI detection tools / AI writing detectors / ChatGPT detectors rely on pattern analysis like perplexity and burstiness (basically measuring how statistically “predictable” the writing is). That works well for raw AI writing, but starts breaking when students/writers edit, paraphrase, or humanize the output. So the best tool is usually the one that balances:

Accuracy on long academic text
Low false positives (human writing flagged as AI)
Low false negatives (AI passing as human)
Clear highlighting of suspect sections
Consistency across topics and styles

What stands out across current top tools

From classroom and reviewer testing in 2025, a few detectors repeatedly show up near the top:

Proofademic AI - built for academic writing; strong essay performance and fewer random false positives; useful paragraph-level feedback.
GPTZero - often strong on raw AI vs human and easy to use, though it can miss humanized AI.
Originality ai - solid on long-form detection, especially when paired with plagiarism checks.
Copyleaks AI Detector - good long-document detection and institutional workflows; mixed results on hybrid writing.
Turnitin AI Detection - strong institutional default, but often opaque in why it flags.

The biggest gotcha: false positives

Recent studies and teacher reports keep warning about false positives, especially for fluent writers, structured essay styles, non-native English students, and short assignments.

That’s why many educators are moving toward a one reliable detector + human judgment + baseline samples workflow instead of relying on multiple free AI checkers.

My take:

If you’re asking “what is the best AI detection tool right now?” the honest answer is:

For academic essays and grading → Proofademic is the most dependable overall in practice.
For broad web/SEO long-form → Originality ai or Copyleaks are strong second picks.
For quick classroom checks → GPTZero is useful, just not bulletproof on humanized AI.

Still, I treat every detector as a signal, not proof. The best AI detector is the one that helps you review smarter without punishing honest writers.

What tools are you all using, and how often are you seeing false positives?

Proofademic AI is the only detector I’ve used in 2025 that feels built for academic writing instead of just web/SEO content. Most tools still overflag essays or ESL writers because they treat fluency like a giveaway. Proofademic is way more stable on real student drafts.

This is a really solid breakdown. In 2025 the best detector isn’t a single magic tool, it’s whichever one gives the lowest false detection on real academic writing.

reddit.com › r/bypassaidetect › most accurate ai detector

r/BypassAiDetect on Reddit: Most Accurate AI Detector

2 weeks ago -

I’ve tested many AI detectors Copyleaks, ZeroGPT, Gptzero, Quillbot and so on

The truth is that every tool can be beaten with the right prompting… except one: GptZero.

Its detection mechanism is incredibly strong. While most tools either falsely flag human content as AI or are easy to bypass, this one consistently gives me the most reliable results. I genuinely think it’s the most accurate AI detector out there and I’ve really grown to trust it.

Many students don't have access to turnitin instructor, and i can understand why they believe the gptzeros of this world are better. But from a freelancer who has to check many papers everyday before submitting to clients, I can confidently say that turnitin instructor is fairly accurate when it comes to AI detection. Gptzero is also good, but has lots of false positives. Anyway, why struggle with AI yet I am here to help draft those assignments? My inbox is open..

Agree with this sentiment

reddit.com › r/blogging › what's a good ai detector?

r/Blogging on Reddit: What's a good AI detector?

August 15, 2023 -

Hi guys! I've used zimmwritter to make my posts and I think that it did a great job! I did my best to make more human, however when it comes to larger posts it just doesn't seem feasible for me to make little edits, specially if I want to post multiple times per week, I tried various AI detectors but they all gave me different results, I was wondering if you could recommend me a reliable one, thank you!

US Constitution was written by AI as per AI Detector Tools. They're useless and waste of time

Nothing is accurate whatsoever, good news it doesn’t matter google couldn’t care less if it’s AI it only cares about helpful content

reddit.com › r/content_marketing › how reliable are ai detectors?

r/content_marketing on Reddit: How reliable are AI detectors?

August 11, 2023 -

Since OpenAI pulled the plug on their AI Text Classifier stating that it wasn't able to detect AI text properly there has been a ongoing debate whether these AI detectors are at all reliable or not.

Now I have my own opinion on this matter but before sharing that let me share some statistics

Studies have been made to test the accuracy of these AI detectors several times and here were some of the findings -

- These detectors often labeled non-English writings under AI-generated even if the content was human-written.

- Most detectors were able to have a 60% or less accurate detection of any type of content.

- Much research also shows tests involving SICO-generated content could easily bypass AI detectors to get a human written verdict.

- Paid AI detectors have a significantly higher accuracy rate but it is still at about 80%.

- AI detectors much like AI tools can be biased in certain scenarios.

My take on the matter

I have used a fair share of AI text detectors including OpenAI's AI Classifier (when it was still available) and to be honest they are quite questionable. It is now quite safe to say AI content is becoming more precise and humanlike which cannot be easily differentiated.

Still, when I see unedited answers copy pasted to Reddit and other communities from ChatGPT it is quite easy to detect without any AI detector.

Having said that I don't think taking help from AI tools to enhance your writing is bad rather I encourage you to do so as it improves the quality of your writing tenfolds.

Do you use AI to create written content? Do you think AI detectors should be more accurate?

Let me know in the comments below.

Not enough to be considered as an absolute evaluation criteria. If you're going to use them, you can take a look at this thread which list includes some of the most commonly used ones; It's always better to use few and compare results, since they use different criteria, you can use them to make edits on parts that actually have problems.

Have more questions? Join our community Discord! I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

reddit.com › r/professors › what ai detectors you're using currently? 100-level composition instructor here.

r/Professors on Reddit: What AI detectors you're using currently? 100-level composition instructor here.

September 22, 2024 -

I'm using Turn-it-In, which is built into the LMS. Papers are coming due soon. I am anticipating problems and want to know what AI detectors you are currently using. I know that detectors aren't 100%. Usually I can tell the AI use by the writing style, but I also know from all of you house students might dig in.

Backstory is that the dept seems to be back in the students more than us. I've probably read most threads on here for the last couple of years on this topic, so I'm not looking for advice other than the detectors and would love to hear your experiences with those.

I have a plan for how I'm going to handle it. I want to use more than one detector. What's working for you?

None. None of them work.

Just my brain, and handwritten writing samples from my students to compare, and also a lack of willingness to die on this hill. If I get something that's obviously chatGPT, I tear it apart over every unsubstantiated claim and every unexplained abstraction and give it a low grade. I will also say things like, "This sounds like chatGPT" in the comments. I'm much more encouraging in feedback with work that is obviously student-written and shows effort with the material.