I'm excited to share my recent side-by-side comparison of Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI's GPT-4o models. Using my AI-powered trading platform NexusTrade as a testing ground, I put these models through their paces on complex financial tasks.

Some key findings:

✅ Claude excels at reasoning and human-like responses, creating a more natural chat experience

✅ GPT-4o is significantly faster, especially when chaining multiple prompts

✅ Claude performed better on complex portfolio configuration tasks

✅ GPT-4o handled certain database queries more effectively

✅ Claude is nearly 2x cheaper for input tokens and has a 50% larger context window

While there's no clear winner across all scenarios, I found Claude 3.5 Sonnet to be slightly better overall for my specific use case. Its ability to handle complex reasoning tasks and generate more natural responses gives it an edge, despite being slower.

Does this align with your experience? Have you tried out the new Claude 3.5 Sonnet model? What did you think?

Also, if you want to read a full comparison, check out the detailed analysis here

I’ve heard that pretty consistently amongst colleagues but i don’t find the UX as good, it can’t access internet search and it doesn’t have unlimited data. Thoughts? What’s the upside? Genuinely curious. I’ve been trying to transition over but having a bit of a hard time of it.

OpenAI focuses on the consumer market with ChatGPT, while Anthropic focus on corporate clients with its Claude AI system.

• OpenAI has over 800 million weekly users for ChatGPT, generating around $13 billion in revenue annually, with 30% coming from businesses.

• Anthropic serves around 300,000 business customers, with 80% of its $7 billion revenue coming from corporate clients, and is gaining a 42% share of the coding AI market.

https://aifeed.fyi/news/48f1e793