AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon aurora › pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing
5 days ago - The effective hourly price shows the amortized hourly instance cost. This takes the total cost of the Reserved Instance over the entire term, including any upfront payment, and spreads it out over each hour of the Reserved Instance term. ... Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Limitless Database is an automated horizontal scaling capability of Aurora that seamlessly scales beyond the write throughput and storage limits of a single instance.
Amazon Web Services
amazonaws.cn › en › rds › aurora › pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing
5 days ago - The effective hourly price shows the amortized hourly instance cost. This takes the total cost of the Reserved Instance over the entire term, including any upfront payment, and spreads it out over each hour of the Reserved Instance term. Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Limitless Database is an automated ...
Will Aurora PostgreSQL ever be anything but a dumpster fire?
I really appreciate how deeply you've explored this; my team was hoping to migrate soon but, after reading your testimony, we will remain on RDS for the foreseeable future. More on reddit.com
35
79
July 24, 2018Amazon Aurora Postgres: First Thoughts
If I understand this correctly, they're using the same block store backing the primary database for the replicas. If that's the case, then wouldn't an issue with the blocking store hose both simultaneously? Or are they just jump starting the replicas copy of the data from the primary's block ... More on news.ycombinator.com
17
100
February 8, 2018Cost for an aurora cluster
Do check how aws charge for their services using this calculator https://calculator.aws/#/ For aurora, if you are not using aurora serverless, you are charged for $/hr minimally even without activity as explained in https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ As for how to check your bill, navigate to aws bills page explained in https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-billing/ . To sum up, please get yourself trained up on how to operate in an AWS environment to prevent cases such as this. More on reddit.com
15
5
March 12, 2024RDS vs Aurora big price difference
Hello, PM for Amazon RDS and Aurora here.
We recommend Amazon Aurora Serverless for bursty workloads that spike up/down frequently. Think an e-commerce website which gets a lot of traffic on weekends and nothing on weekdays. Our customers love not having to scale the database to account for the surge or drop in traffic.
Amazon RDS and "regular" Amazon Aurora are for workloads that need sustained throughput. Think a search website which gets traffic throughout the day/week etc.
Hope that helps!
More on reddit.com 49
48
August 28, 2018Videos
12:56
Optimize Amazon RDS and Aurora Costs with ElastiCache for Redis ...
09:44
Amazon Aurora Backup Cost Estimation - YouTube
52:05
AWS Supports You | Diving Deep into Aurora Cost Optimization - YouTube
32:19
Amazon Aurora I/O Cost Optimization Methodology | Amazon Web Services ...
Fauna
fauna.com › blog › compare-aws-aurora-serverless-v2-architecture-features-pricing-vs-fauna
AWS Aurora Serverless v2: Architecture, Features, Pricing, and Comparison with Fauna
April 16, 2024 - Despite the more granular provisioning and billing in Aurora Serverless v2, many legacy operational concerns remain. However, Aurora’s architecture allows it to maintain compatibility with existing PostgreSQL and MySQL workloads — a major benefit for developers who need to migrate from ...
TrustRadius
trustradius.com › home › database-as-a-service (dbaas) › amazon aurora › pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing 2025: Compare Plans and Costs
The math formula they use to get the pricing is as follows: 1 instance(s) x 9.28 USD hourly (for the type of database) x 730 hours in a month = 6774.4000 USD which ends at the estimate of $6,774.40 each month.
Cloudthread
cloudthread.io › blog › understanding-amazon-aurora-serverless-pricing
Understanding Amazon Aurora Serverless Pricing
May 18, 2022 - But pay-for-use can get complicated when talking about a database cluster, since there are several ways to define "use." The main things you need to consider are compute capacity, storage capacity, and moving data. Currently, both the MySQL and PostgreSQL versions of Aurora have the same cost, but that may change in the future.
Simplilearn
simplilearn.com › home › resources
AWS Aurora: Architecture, Pricing, MySQL & PostgreSQL ...
March 30, 2025 - Get access to our latest resources articles, videos, eBooks & webinars catering to all sectors and fast-track your career.
Address 5851 Legacy Circle, 6th Floor, Plano, TX 75024 United States
Capterra
capterra.ca › home › database software › amazon aurora
Amazon Aurora Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra Canada 2025
Application developers, database administrators, system administrators, DevOps engineers. ... Amazon Aurora does not have a free version and does not offer a free trial. Amazon Aurora paid version starts at US$0.02. Get Price ...
TutorialsPoint
tutorialspoint.com › aws-aurora-architecture-pricing-mysql-and-postgresql-compatibility
AWS Aurora: Architecture, Pricing, MySQL, and PostgreSQL Compatibility
High performance and scalability, three times PostgreSQL's performance, Backtrack (which speeds up data backup), storage auto-scaling, highly secure, managed, monitoring, automatic software update, automatic, automatic software, migration support, and cost-effectiveness (pay per use) are all features of this database (as your storage demands rise, Amazon Aurora automatically expands the size of your database volume).
Medium
medium.com › trackit › aurora-or-aurora-serverless-v2-which-is-more-cost-effective-bcd12e172dcf
Aurora or Aurora Serverless v2, Which Is More Cost-Effective? | by Joffrey escobar | TrackIt | Medium
May 25, 2021 - Despite being cheaper at max capacity ($0.368 vs. $0.56 for 8 ACUs), Aurora would require the company to pay for 8 ACUs all throughout the day even when the database base usage is minimal.
AWS
aws.amazon.com › products › database › amazon rds
Managed Relational Database - Amazon RDS Pricing - Amazon Web Services
5 days ago - For provisioned instances on Amazon Aurora, RDS for MySQL, and RDS for PostgreSQL, RDS Extended Support is priced per vCPU per hour. For Aurora Serverless v2, RDS Extended Support is priced per Aurora Capacity Unit (ACU) per hour consumed by your database.
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon rds for postgresql › pricing
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL Pricing
5 days ago - Storage (per GB per month) – ... RDS for PostgreSQL DB instance. If you scale your provisioned storage capacity within the month, your bill will be pro-rated. I/O requests per month – Total number of storage I/O requests (for Amazon RDS magnetic storage and Amazon Aurora ...
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon aurora › serverless
Serverless Database - Amazon Aurora Serverless - AWS
5 days ago - Aurora Serverless v2 is available for Aurora MySQL-Compatible and PostgreSQL-Compatible editions. It's easy to get started: choose Serverless v2 when creating your Aurora database cluster, specify the desired range of database capacity or use the defaults, and connect your applications.
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon aurora › features
Amazon Aurora MySQL and PostgreSQL Features
5 days ago - Aurora Optimized Reads for Aurora PostgreSQL offers customers, with latency-sensitive applications and large working sets, a compelling price-performance alternative to meet their business SLAs. Customers also have more flexibility to grow their datasets without the need to frequently upsize ...
Percona
percona.com › home › aurora vs rds: how to choose the right aws database solution
When Should I Use Amazon Aurora and When ... - Percona
February 24, 2025 - Amazon Aurora is a proprietary, cloud-native, fully managed relational database service developed by Amazon Web Services (AWS). With its support for MySQL and PostgreSQL, and its automated replication and backup capabilities, it’s designed to deliver high performance, scalability, and availability to meet the needs of mission-critical applications.
Medium
medium.com › @jaychapel › aws-postgres-pricing-comparison-3b9e956105a8
AWS Postgres Pricing Comparison
August 16, 2019 - The same instance size as above, an m5.large with 2 CPUs and 8 GB of memory, is approximately $130 per month for a single AZ, or $260 per month for a multi-AZ setup. One additional option when looking at AWS Postgres pricing is AWS Aurora...
Reddit
reddit.com › r/aws › will aurora postgresql ever be anything but a dumpster fire?
r/aws on Reddit: Will Aurora PostgreSQL ever be anything but a dumpster fire?
July 24, 2018 -
-
Recent AWS ads in the console:
Amazon Aurora is a MySQL- and PostgreSQL-compatible enterprise-class database, starting at <$1/day.
After month-long support tag, I was told I "misinterpreted" the statement. The correct interpretation of that statement was that I could get a Aurora MySQL-compatible database for <$1/day, or an Aurora PostgreSQL-compatible database for no less than $7/day (or $2.50/day with 3yr upfront reservation).
2. The pricing section for Aurora PostgreSQL (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/) has "Serverless Pricing". Except...that Severless Pricing isn't available for Aurora PostgreSQL. This is the Aurora PostgreSQL-specific pricing section, and it's talking about pricing that simply isn't even available.
3. In the pattern of basically all Aurora docs/announcements, AWS recently announced "Amazon Aurora Backtrack – Turn Back Time" (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-aurora-backtrack-turn-back-time/). Except if you the post all the way to the bottom, you find at the very end that is "Amazon Aurora MySQL Backtrack". I guess that title isn't as exciting?
4. AFAIK it's not documented anywhere, but major version upgrades for Aurora PostgreSQL are impossible. 100% impossible. Try creating from snapshots, setting up replicas, whatever....it is 100% not possible to do a non-minor upgrade of Aurora PostgreSQL ever. You have to kludge together your own text import/export process between clusters, migration scripts, etc. which takes literally days on any decent data set. I hope you like the version of PostgreSQL you start with, because that's the one you're keeping.
---
Anyone have the inside scoop? Is Aurora PostgreSQL actually used by anybody? Is it ever not going to be a misleading and poorly supported product? Or should I go back to non-hyped vanilla PostgreSQL RDS?
Top answer 1 of 7
22
I really appreciate how deeply you've explored this; my team was hoping to migrate soon but, after reading your testimony, we will remain on RDS for the foreseeable future.
2 of 7
20
They used to have the $1/day claim on the Aurora Postgres page. I raised a support issue asking how I could get that, gave them a screenshot of the claim, and they gave me an account credit and updated that page. It seems like they've still got the confusing language floating around in places. I agree that the Aurora Postgres offerings have been disappointing. Historically I've been much happier with Postgres as a database, but the benefits of Aurora have pushed me back towards MySQL for now, since it seems to be where most of the attention is going. My applications use abstraction layer that makes it easy enough to support both, so if Aurora Postgres ever catches up we may migrate, but I'm not holding my breath.
Severalnines
severalnines.com › home › posts pages › an overview of amazon rds & aurora offerings for postgresql
An Overview of Amazon RDS & Aurora Offerings for PostgreSQL | Severalnines
May 4, 2022 - AWS PostgreSQL services fall under the RDS umbrella, which is Amazon’s DaaS offering for all known database engines. Managed database services offer certain advantages that are appealing to the customer seeking independence from infrastructure maintenance, and highly available configurations. As always, there isn’t a one size fits all solution. The currently available options are highlighted below: The Amazon Aurora FAQ page provides important details that need to be considered before diving into the product.
Hacker News
news.ycombinator.com › item
Amazon Aurora Postgres: First Thoughts | Hacker News
February 8, 2018 - If I understand this correctly, they're using the same block store backing the primary database for the replicas. If that's the case, then wouldn't an issue with the blocking store hose both simultaneously? Or are they just jump starting the replicas copy of the data from the primary's block ...
Ec2instances
ec2instances.info › rds
Amazon RDS Instance Comparison
September 14, 2020 - A free and easy-to-use tool for comparing RDS Instance features and prices.
Stackshare
stackshare.io › stackups › amazon-rds-for-aurora-vs-postgresql
Stackshare
July 18, 2020 - Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world · © 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved