Showing results for Aurora, CO, US
With Serverless v2, the hourly cost is somewhere like 12-20 cents per ACU per hour, depending on the AWS Region. You can check the price for each combination of AWS Region and Aurora database engine here: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ Let's consider us-east-1, which (as of January 2024) is 12 cents per ACU per hour. The minimum for Serverless v2 is 0.5 ACUs, so 6 cents / hour. A typical month has 720 hours (30 days) or 744 (31 days). So if you set minimum capacity to 0.5 ACUs, leave the cluster idle, and nothing unexpected happens, best case is roughly $43-45 per month for instance charges. Plus whatever usage-based charges for storage, I/O, and there are some other optional features that could result in charges. (That's why you would go through the exercise with the pricing calculator.) What could interfere with the best case? Turning on memory-consuming or CPU-consuming features could prevent the idle cluster from scaling down to 0.5 ACUs. Something like Performance Insights (minimum 2 ACUs) or global database (minimum 8 ACUs). Cleanup operations like PostgreSQL vacuum could run and cause scaling up when you think the database should be idle. What actions could you take to make the best case even better? Do "stop cluster" overnight or other long periods when you don't need to use the database. If you need to add reader instances to the cluster to test out multi-AZ usage (read/write splitting etc.), delete the reader instances when they're not needed. Have cron jobs to run stop-db-cluster, modify-db-cluster, etc. to put things into a cheaper state during overnight periods if you forget to do it at the end of the day. Answer from rePost-User-6113899 on repost.aws
🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › amazon aurora › pricing
Amazon Aurora Pricing
3 days ago - Aurora PostgreSQL and Aurora MySQL offer On-Demand and Reserved Instance pricing. Aurora charges for database instances and storage, along with any optional features you choose to enable. Aurora DSQL has a serverless pricing model, and you can learn more on Aurora DSQL pricing page.
🌐
Hacker News
news.ycombinator.com › item
AWS Aurora Serverless v2: architecture, features, pricing, comparison with Fauna | Hacker News
January 13, 2021 - Where does the $1,050 come from · Even if scale to zero is eventually supported, some minimum capacity will still be required to avoid cold start latency
🌐
CloudZero
cloudzero.com › home › blog › aws aurora pricing: how to save costs in 2025
AWS Aurora Pricing: How To Save Costs In 2025
March 25, 2025 - The cost for Aurora Serverless v2 is $0.12 per ACU-hour, which is double that of v1 at $0.06 per ACU-hour. Now that we’ve covered AWS Aurora pricing, let’s talk about optimizing your Aurora costs.
Top answer
1 of 2
2
With Serverless v2, the hourly cost is somewhere like 12-20 cents per ACU per hour, depending on the AWS Region. You can check the price for each combination of AWS Region and Aurora database engine here: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ Let's consider us-east-1, which (as of January 2024) is 12 cents per ACU per hour. The minimum for Serverless v2 is 0.5 ACUs, so 6 cents / hour. A typical month has 720 hours (30 days) or 744 (31 days). So if you set minimum capacity to 0.5 ACUs, leave the cluster idle, and nothing unexpected happens, best case is roughly $43-45 per month for instance charges. Plus whatever usage-based charges for storage, I/O, and there are some other optional features that could result in charges. (That's why you would go through the exercise with the pricing calculator.) What could interfere with the best case? Turning on memory-consuming or CPU-consuming features could prevent the idle cluster from scaling down to 0.5 ACUs. Something like Performance Insights (minimum 2 ACUs) or global database (minimum 8 ACUs). Cleanup operations like PostgreSQL vacuum could run and cause scaling up when you think the database should be idle. What actions could you take to make the best case even better? Do "stop cluster" overnight or other long periods when you don't need to use the database. If you need to add reader instances to the cluster to test out multi-AZ usage (read/write splitting etc.), delete the reader instances when they're not needed. Have cron jobs to run stop-db-cluster, modify-db-cluster, etc. to put things into a cheaper state during overnight periods if you forget to do it at the end of the day.
2 of 2
0
Your best bet is to use AWS Calculator # https://calculator.aws/#/ in order to estimate the operating cost with the services that you plan to use. Secondly using the Graviton2 instances would save a lot compared with other instances. I have listed some common instance types that you may start using and then change later based on your project workload. t4g : For dev/test workload m6g : For general purpose workload r6g : For memory optimized workload Go with small storage initially and then you can scale it based on the need to optimize the cost.
Discussions

Aurora Serverless v2: Minimum Cost Setup for Development Environment
If any fellow developers have ... for Aurora Serverless v2 in a development context, I would greatly appreciate your insights. Thank you in advance for your valuable input! ... With Serverless v2, the hourly cost is somewhere like 12-20 cents per ACU per hour, depending on the AWS Region. You can check the price for each ... More on repost.aws
🌐 repost.aws
2
0
January 24, 2024
Need some guidance on reducing the cost of my Aurora serverless database.
If you're sensitive to costs and don't have the need for complex relationships, you can save a ton by going with DynamoDB on demand billing. It'll almost definitely be cheaper. At your current load, it might be less than a dollar a month. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
27
28
October 31, 2022
amazon web services - Recently updated to Aurora Serverless v2 from v1. RDS Bill increased 3x. How can I downgrade back to v1? - Stack Overflow
Our RDS Bill increased 3x after migrating from Aurora Serverless v1 to v2. We can't figure out why - trying to find a way to downgrade back to v1. Ideally, a slight cost increase only - but it look... More on stackoverflow.com
🌐 stackoverflow.com
Aurora Serverless v2 vs RDS cost comparison?
Had a similar scenario, coworkers migrated to aurora serverless v2 since 1 month and we don't see any real issue so far. Cost definitely improved but we are still looking to understand the ACU consumption which is a bit higher than what we expected More on reddit.com
🌐 r/aws
17
22
February 4, 2023
🌐
Amazon Web Services
docs.aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › user guide for aurora › what is amazon aurora? › db instance billing for aurora
DB instance billing for Aurora - Amazon Aurora
Aurora Serverless v2 – Aurora Serverless v2 provides on-demand capacity where the billing unit is Aurora capacity unit (ACU) hours instead of DB instance hours. Aurora Serverless v2 capacity increases and decreases, within a range that you specify, depending on the load on your database.
🌐
PlanetScale
planetscale.com › blog › amazon-aurora-pricing-the-many-surprising-costs-of-running-an-aurora-database
Amazon Aurora Pricing: The many surprising costs of running an Aurora database — PlanetScale
The information provided in this article is specific to Aurora and not Aurora Serverless. Aurora Serverless is a different configuration that has its own pricing model. Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and Postgres-compatible database platform on AWS that simplifies the process of creating and managing a MySQL database.
🌐
Lumigo
lumigo.io › guides › aws serverless ecosystem › aurora serverless v2: why you need it, new features and pricing
Aurora Serverless v2: Why You Need It, New Features and Pricing
December 19, 2022 - The cost of Aurora Serverless v2 appears expensive, and while it is possible to save costs on your database for peak loads, it is not a cost-effective option for everyone. ... The price of Aurora capacity units (ACUs) in v2 ($0.12/hr) is twice ...
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/aws › need some guidance on reducing the cost of my aurora serverless database.
r/aws on Reddit: Need some guidance on reducing the cost of my Aurora serverless database.
October 31, 2022 -

Hey there,

Sorry if I lack any technical jargon for this question, I'm still pretty novice to AWS.Right now I have a desktop application that has a leaderboard function. For this I decided with would be best to go down the RDS path. I know pretty little about connecting and running databases, so I opted to go with the serverless route, and wanted to access the database using the Aurora API/ lambda.

I saw AWS deprecated mySQL for serverless 1.0, and since serverless 2.0 does not support the aurora API, I went with the postgres option, as I could still use the API.

I think this is the first mistake, as it seems the minimum ACUs for the postgres option is double of the mySQL. But either way my database has a min and max of 2 ACUs which is probably far more than my application needs. I would estimate max, my user pool will be about 50k and its just storing simple leaderboard numbers.

After one month of running the database, my monthly bill came out to ~230 dollars, which is just a lot especially since I have not even launched this product yet.My main cost was in just running the database :

$0.08 per Aurora Capacity Unit hour running Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Serverless

2,840.991 ACU-Hr

$227.28

So does anyone have any advice on where to start in reducing the cost ? Should I move off postgres?Would running the EC2 and manually managing the database be cheaper? Would no longer using the API be cheaper ? Any help appreciated

Edit : Wow I just realized while posting this my ACU numbers did not add up and it turns out I was running a second database all month with nothing in it. So thats half the cost atleast lol. But still my questions apply

🌐
DEV Community
dev.to › aws-builders › caught-in-a-cost-optimization-trap-aurora-serverless-v2-with-rds-proxy-2mng
Caught in a Cost Optimization Trap: Aurora Serverless v2 with RDS Proxy - DEV Community
April 9, 2025 - At the time, we were transitioning ... root cause of the cost spike. ... Comparing instance costs alone, Serverless v2 was about $1 cheaper....
🌐
Amazon Web Services
docs.aws.amazon.com › amazon rds › user guide for aurora › using aurora serverless v2
Using Aurora Serverless v2 - Amazon Aurora
Aurora Serverless v2 adds resources in granular increments when DB instances scale up. You pay only for the database resources that you consume. Aurora Serverless v2 resource usage is measured on a per-second basis. That way, when a DB instance scales down, the reduced resource usage is registered right away.
🌐
Holori
holori.com › accueil › blog › mastering aws aurora pricing: tips for cost optimization
Holori - Mastering AWS Aurora Pricing: Tips for Cost Optimization
October 25, 2024 - Aurora Capacity Unit (ACU): Serverless pricing is based on the number of ACUs used per second. An ACU is a unit of database capacity that combines both memory and processing power.
🌐
AWS
calculator.aws
AWS Pricing Calculator
AWS Pricing Calculator lets you explore AWS services, and create an estimate for the cost of your use cases on AWS.
🌐
Bytebase
bytebase.com › blog › understanding-aws-aurora-pricing
Understanding AWS Aurora Pricing (2025)
Aurora Serverless (v2): Auto-scales in 0.5 ACU increments, billed per ACU-hour (~$0.12/ACU-hour).
🌐
Medium
engineering.doit.com › comparing-aurora-distributed-sql-vs-aurora-serverless-v2-a-practical-cost-analysis-f7cf9cd2dbf8
Comparing Aurora DSQL vs. Aurora Serverless v2: A Practical Cost Analysis | by Kate Gawron | DoiT
July 1, 2025 - Compute: Billed per Distributed Processing Unit (DPU) - Rate: $8 per 1 million DPUs - 100K DPUs ≈ ~700,000 TPC-C transactions (based on AWS benchmarks) https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/dsql/pricing/ ... So what exactly is a DPU? It’s like ACUs all over again, where it’s nearly impossible ...
🌐
AWS
aws.amazon.com › blogs › database › evaluating-the-right-fit-for-your-amazon-aurora-workloads-provisioned-or-serverless-v2
Evaluating the right fit for your Amazon Aurora workloads: provisioned or Serverless v2 | AWS Database Blog
October 23, 2024 - This includes data storage, I/O and compute. Since Aurora Serverless v2 is an instance construct, only the instance pricing changes when using Aurora Serverless v2. With provisioned instances, the price depends on the type and size of instance and is billed per hour.
🌐
Substack
annpastushko.substack.com › p › aurora-limitless-vs-serverless-v2
🐾Aurora Limitless vs Serverless v2🐾 - APAWS
December 2, 2024 - Despite the fact that Aurora Limitless is serverless, you cannot scale it down to 0 or pause. Minimum capacity for it is 16 ACUs. If you interested in more details on Aurora Limitless architecture, I suggest watching AWS re:Invent 2023 - Achieving scale with Amazon Aurora Limitless Database.
🌐
Jeremydaly
jeremydaly.com › aurora-serverless-v2-preview
Aurora Serverless v2: The Good, the Better, and the Possibly Amazing - Jeremy Daly
There's no way to sugar coat this. The cost of Aurora Serverless v2 seems very high. In fact, v2 ACUs are twice the price of the original v1 ACUs ($0.12 per ACU Hour versus $0.06 per ACU Hour).