Just to clarify another response that was posted on here, the idea that all bagless vacuum cleaners need to be emptied and have a filter washed after every use is ridiculous, totally false, and comes across as a sales pitch for bagged vacuum cleaners. Especially coming from a "technician," that is a massive and misleading generalization. For example, I use a bagless canister with a multi-cyclonic bin and I easily go a couple months without washing the filter without a noticeable drop in airflow. In reality, there are all kinds of bagless systems. Some of them are quite mediocre. For example, a Shark uses a basic single cyclonic separator that does not filter fine particles too well, so the filter in something like that may need to be washed after a few uses to maintain optimum performance and/or to prevent dirt from getting into the motor. On the other hand, something with an advanced multi-cyclonic system such as a Dyson, LG, or Samsung is going to need much less filter and bin maintenance. You are definitely not going to be slaving away cleaning filters with any of them. Making such a blanket statement about bagless vacuum cleaners certainly is silly and hurts whatever argument is presented. I get what you mean with the convenience of a stick vacuum cleaner. It is easy to want to clean a mess or clean in cycles and just run to the closet or wherever and instantly start cleaning without dragging a large unit out of the closet, finding a plug, and what not. I think it may be helpful to go through the brands that you have listed. Tineco is a somewhat big name now, although I have not been impressed with the quality of the vacuum cleaners that they offer. They are the brand of a quite reputable manufacturer, EcoVacs, which has done manufacturing for many other companies, even Hoover! They do have skin in the game, but they are trying to undercut Dyson, and they largely do that by manufacturing and selling a cheaper product, both in price and build quality. There are parts of the units that are decent such as the motors, but the overall build quality is lacking and the filters do tend to get dirty quite quickly. They fall well below Dyson, Samsung, and LG in that department. The Hoovers are decent, but they are also budget options like the Tineco. The Hoover ONEPWR Evolve is a great vacuum cleaner for what it is, though it is limited on what it can do and the build quality is nothing special. I have heard of the hoses ripping, for example. It has a basic cyclone setup with a foam filter, so it will need to be washed every so often, although most definitely not after every use. The manual of any bagless vacuum cleaner will tell you a rough interval for washing the filter and you can figure out how often you want to do it based on that estimate given by the manufacturer. Anyway, the Evolve is only an upright vacuum cleaner, so there are no attachments. It has a carpet mode, hard floor mode, and that is it. Like I said, it is good at those tasks, but limited; hence the low price. The Hoover ONEPWR Blade+ is fine. I find the build quality to be somewhat mediocre, though. I have one where the brush roll melted through the base and is totally ruined, and the filter does get dirty pretty fast. Again, for the price, it is decent, but you can do better at the top end of your budget. The Samsung Jet 75 and Jet 90 are basically the same unit, but the 90 comes with a dual charging stand and extender wand. Pay attention to what attachments come with these, because they make different attachment packages. Some come with soft rollers for hard floors and some do not. The soft rollers are nice for hard floors. To compare the Samsungs to the Hoovers and Tinecos, Samsung makes the superior product. Even holding them and comparing them side by side, the Samsungs feel nicer and more premium. Plus, they are more powerful and versatile. With the Samsungs, you get a universal head that works on carpet, a soft roller, a miniature power nozzle, and a couple other basic attachments. It also has a sealed cloth pre-motor filter and a multi-cyclonic bin. Both the filters and the cyclones are washable too. Also, the rollers remove from the head to clean any hair that may have collected behind the rollers or around them. The 75 and 90 would be at the top of my consideration list based on your wants and needs. Samsung is a reputable brand, too. The LG CordZero A9 line is a similar product to the Samsung. They are comparable in build quality, performance, overall design, and so forth. It even has the same features like the washable cyclones and filters, removable brush rolls, and so forth. Just pay attention to the attachments and how many batteries come with the LG units. They make a bunch of different models, and some of them only come with one battery and one head. If you want the soft roller for hard floors, make sure it comes in the box if you do not want to buy it separately. One nice thing about the LGs is that they come with dual charging stands, even the cheaper models. Also, some people prefer how the bins of the LG models empty. It is slightly easier than the Samsungs, although the Samsungs can be paired with their Clean Station bagged emptying device. I would consider these too. LG is also a reputable brand, and I know that they have wonderful customer service. The Dyson Outsize, although Dyson gets a bad name because of a few people on this subreddit, the Outsize is not a horrible vacuum cleaner. It is slightly more powerful than the Samsung and LG models, and the bin is huge. It does lack the washable cyclone, but they clean quite well and some people love the capacity of the bin. The Outsize is my favorite Dyson cordless. Anyway, although the big bin can be seen as an upside, some users also find them to be too big and bulky. Aside from the big bin and lack of a washable cyclone, they still share features such as the washable filters, removable brush rolls, removable batteries, and so forth as the Samsung and LG offerings. Unfortunately, there is not charging stand, though. My suggestion is to go to a store and try these different units and see which one you like the most. Lowe's often has the Samsung models on display, and I know Best Buy has the LG and Dyson models too. That is the case where I live, at least. I will probably get downvoted for this, but the Outsize is worth consideration. Most folks who I have met who have bought the newer Dyson models have been beyond satisfied with them. The last three brands all boast and seem to achieve impressive run times. I hope this was relatively helpful.