Hi I’m new to the whole high end camera thing. When I first got into shooting videos all the YouTubers were talking about C-log 3 when reviewing canon cameras. I recently for the first time heard about C-log 2. Is the difference that noticeable? What would be the differences?
Videos
What is the difference between Canon Log, Canon Log 2 and Canon Log 3?
The original Canon Log delivers a dynamic range of approximately 12 stops, Canon Log 2 up to 16 stops, and Canon Log 3 up to 14 stops. Canon Log 2 retains more detail in darker areas than Canon Log 3 but also features an elevated noise floor. Canon Log 3 is easier to grade thanks to producing a cleaner image and retains the same amount of highlight information as Canon Log 2.
What is Canon Log used for?
Canon Log is used to capture video footage that has a wider dynamic range and exposure latitude than standard video. The Canon Log tone curve is applied at the point of capture to retain more details in the highlights and shadows compared to standard video.
Which Canon Log is best for low light?
Canon Log 2 is the ideal choice for when maximum detail is required, particularly in low-light scenes to extract shadow information. However, it will also cause elevated noise in those darker regions of the image and therefore require more time in post-production.
Hi, so I'm a uni film student, and I'm hoping to be a colourist in the future. In an upcoming project we're working with Canon C70s and I have suggested to shoot in CLog 2, whereas a tutor suggested to shoot in Wide DR while I wasn't there, so I didn't get a chance to ask about it to understand why he thinks it was better.
I'm wondering if anyone could help explain why this may have been suggested?
From my standpoint CLog 2 would be better due to having much higher dynamic range, and not taking too much more time to edit if I use the CLog to rec.709 LUTs Canon provides.
For the shoot it will all be inside shots, and dark in a lot of scenarios because it's a horror film. Which do you think would be better, and why?
It seems like: I always (not everytime) heard people ranting about "C-LOG 2 is superior than C-LOG 3".
While it can be true, C-LOG 3 record your whole entire camera's DR (Dynamic Range), while C-LOG 2 doesn't increase your camera's DR, but rather lifting your shadow curve, thus making your shadow noisier.
So, with my understanding of C-LOG 2 vs. C-LOG 3 / or equiv., I just hate when people misunderstood that C-LOG 2 "increases" a camera's DR.
———
Did I get this right? Or am I wrong?
—Also—
What the hell happened to CanonRumors?