Hi I’m new to the whole high end camera thing. When I first got into shooting videos all the YouTubers were talking about C-log 3 when reviewing canon cameras. I recently for the first time heard about C-log 2. Is the difference that noticeable? What would be the differences?
Am I getting this right? (C-LOG 2 vs. C-LOG 3)
Video: Upgraded Canon Log2 and New Canon Log3 at DVinfo.net
Why R5 and clog 1 and 3 but R5 2 has clog 2. I thought the log versions are higher the better
What are some of the pros and Cons of using Clog2 over clog3? Just the dynamic range?
What is the difference between Canon Log, Canon Log 2 and Canon Log 3?
The original Canon Log delivers a dynamic range of approximately 12 stops, Canon Log 2 up to 16 stops, and Canon Log 3 up to 14 stops. Canon Log 2 retains more detail in darker areas than Canon Log 3 but also features an elevated noise floor. Canon Log 3 is easier to grade thanks to producing a cleaner image and retains the same amount of highlight information as Canon Log 2.
What is Canon Log used for?
Canon Log is used to capture video footage that has a wider dynamic range and exposure latitude than standard video. The Canon Log tone curve is applied at the point of capture to retain more details in the highlights and shadows compared to standard video.
Which Canon Log is best for low light?
Canon Log 2 is the ideal choice for when maximum detail is required, particularly in low-light scenes to extract shadow information. However, it will also cause elevated noise in those darker regions of the image and therefore require more time in post-production.
Videos
It seems like: I always (not everytime) heard people ranting about "C-LOG 2 is superior than C-LOG 3".
While it can be true, C-LOG 3 record your whole entire camera's DR (Dynamic Range), while C-LOG 2 doesn't increase your camera's DR, but rather lifting your shadow curve, thus making your shadow noisier.
So, with my understanding of C-LOG 2 vs. C-LOG 3 / or equiv., I just hate when people misunderstood that C-LOG 2 "increases" a camera's DR.
———
Did I get this right? Or am I wrong?
—Also—
What the hell happened to CanonRumors?
Just wrapped a long series of doc interviews and scene work, shot on the Mini.
I'm being sent back out in a week to shoot additional b-roll for this film, but budgets have run dry there's only room for a Canon or Sony. So I'm thinking the C300iii or FX9. At this point, we are not considering other brands.
Lenses will be the same, so all else being equal, what's going to be the better match with Log C?
I'm leaning toward the Canon, namely because I came across an Arri lookalike LUT for the C300iii's: https://owl-bot.myshopify.com/products/owlcolor-c300mkiii