R6 ii vs R6 iii.
To those who bought the R6 II instead of the R6 III, do you feel left out?
At this moment, does it make sense to buy the R6 Mark II or wait for the R6 Mark III?
Should I buy the r6 mark ii or mark iii?
Videos
Right now I have the 90d and tamron 150-600. I am planning on getting the rf 200-800 with one of the cameras. I usually do wildlife photography and video. I don’t really have a budget but I am planning on selling my regular set up on KEH. I have been using canon products for two years and this would be my first mirrorless camera.
I have an old 5Dii as my main body that I use for wildlife photography and travels.
Looking to switch to a mirrorless finally and have a trip coming up to Antarctica. Looking for advice on deciding between a R6ii or R6iii. The price difference is around $500.
[Update}: Thanks for the advice in the comments, I went ahead and bought the Riii
I am currently using the R8 and I am trying get more serious with my photography as a business.
I have been planning on buying the R6 III since it's new, has newer sensor and has improved AF. But I could not shake the feeling that the older R6 II is still a capable camera plus it shares the same sensor as the R8.
I dunno. I need advice.
I'm considering getting the Canon R6 Mark II, but as you all know there are rumors that the Canon R6 Mark III might be announced as early as the first quarter of this year. Based on your experience, how long does Canon typically take to make new models available worldwide after an announcement? Do you think the price of the R6 Mark III will be around the same as the current non-discounted price of the Mark II? If you’ve faced a similar decision, what did you do?
In my country, the R6 Mark II is currently available on sale as a bundle with the RF 24-105mm F4 IS USM lens for $3,200.