G' day,
Previously coming from the Canon platform (Rebel T5) I've decided it's time for an upgrade. After some lengthy research, I've considered my budget and narrowed it down to 2 cameras but am having difficulty deciding which one I should purchase.
A little about what got me into photography/what I shoot:
I always grew up around and loved playing with cameras. So when I became a high schooler, I decided to take a few photography classes. From there, I haven't been able to put my camera down. I mainly shoot car photography and landscapes in my spare time and am noticing a general lack of quality with 95% of my shots. I feel that my current camera is becoming outdated and that now would be the best time to invest in a new camera. With that said, these are the current pros I found from each of my preferred cameras.
R7 pro's:
-
Larger sensor
-
Contains IBS
-
Longer battery life
-
Extra card slot
R8 pro's:
-
Full frame
-
Seemingly better video capabilities
-
Stronger low-light quality
-
Newer/slightly cheaper
-
Most professional creators prefer the R8's capabilities compared to the R7's (from sources viewed)
-- I initially found myself drawn to the R7's larger sensor, battery life, and especially IBS features. However, almost all YouTube videos make it seem the R8 has a slight edge over the R7. I do want to start taking more videos/rollers of cars and wouldn't mind the improved video quality that the R8 boasts. Not to mention the full-framed R8's performance in darker scenes. My only worry is the smaller sensor in the R8 along with the lack of IBS would compromise picture quality and would be noticeably worse than that in the R7.
What are your thoughts?
Also... what are some cheap quality lenses I should look into buying for a camera like this?
Thanks a lot!
-Drake
Videos
Hello! I'm debating buying either an R7 or R8 to upgrade from my Canon 80D. I do mostly wildlife (birding primarily) and macro photography. I'd also like to dabble with more video and portrait photography. On paper, I know all the differences between the R7 and R8, but real world performance, is one better than the other? I've heard that the R7 has AF issues with EF glass (pulsing on Sigma 150-600C) and has a low readout speed. While the R8 has worse battery and ergonomics. But is FF significantly better than crop that a more stripped down R8 is better than R7?
Hello everyone. Currently I shoot using my first ever camera, a Canon T7/2000D. This has served me well but I feel like it is time to upgrade.
Main lens is my EF 100-400L II and I feel like my current camera is not doing this lens enough justice.
Now I mainly shoot wildlife, birds (sitting and in flight) and everything I run into. Landscape. My own dog aswell as my friends and family their dogs. Have not dabbled into portraits or people photography but would like to venture into it at some point.
My current camera being an APS-C allows me to bring me subject closer to me without being close to it because of the crop factor, and I do love this. Is the image quality of the R8, a full frame camera, much better than a crop sensor camera? Therefore will I be able to crop the images from a full frame camera far enough for it to be similar to the reach of an APS-C camera?
Both the R7 and R8 have their pros and cons and I am currently stuck deciding between them.
Wondering if anyone is or has been in a similar situation and able to help me out with some answers.