R10, R8, R7... Which of these will age better, which worse, and why?
figuring out if r10 would be enough for me vs r7? | DPReview Forums
R7 vs R8
Upgrading from a R10 --> R7 or R8?
Videos
Not long ago I bought an R7 and I totally love it! I was curious about R8 so I checked the specs and so on For the price of both cameras I tend to think that the R7 comes at a much better price/specs ratio than the R8, but since I don’t know a lot about photography i was wondering
What are your thoughts? Or maybe they are ment for different purposes?
Just to make my point clear, i love the R7 and i wouldn’t change it, I’m just curious here 👀
Short story: I bough the R10 with the RF-s 18-150mm last year to family and traveling photos, and was very satisfied with it. This year I started to shoot swimming competitions for my son's team and bought a 70-200mm F4 IS. The races occur usually outdoors in daylight, but sometimes afternoon and in the evening. In daylight I'm very satisfied with the results, but when comes to dusk and evening there are mixed results (only pushed up to ISO 6400).
I'm having an opportunity to upgrade, so I sold the R10 and the 70-200. Already bought a used 70-200mm F2.8 IS II, and now I have to decide the new body.
I read a lot about the R7 and R8 and I'm really on a crossroad. I know the R7 will give me the extra reach with the crop factor, but the R8 will give me better results in low light situations.
If I manage to seel the RF-s 18-150mm, I'll buy normal zoom (up to 70mm or a little less) lens and maybe an extender if I go to the R8.
Have any one been through a similar situation? What's your opinion?
Hello friends, this might sound a bit stupid for you all, but I’m really struggling with this.
In the next few months, I intent to buy a Canon camera. My budget is tight, but I will stretch it to the point of getting a decent mirrorless. And by decent I’m talking about the Canon EOS R7.
My REAL budget is for the ballpark of a Canon EOS R10. But as I said, I think I can wait a few months and push it to the R7.
I’ve been reading a lot, watching videos, reviews… all that jazz.
When it comes to lenses, I really like the big range of focal lengths. I know… they are versatile, but not great in any length in particular. But I like it. I really like the capacity to be able to take a picture of a ladybug at 1 meter from me and in the next moment take a picture of a duck a couple of hundreds of meters away without changing glass.
That’s my main goal: wildlife photos. Near and far.
I am an amateur, an enthusiast, not a professional (to be clear).
So… why R7? It seems to be a great body. And Canon bundles it with the 18-150mm, which fits perfectly for my liking.
However… the R8 is pretty much the same price point, but it’s a full frame. So… how important it is to be full frame? The R8 body is clearly inferior to the R7, except for the sensor type.
That’s my question. How much people value full frame? Is it an advantage so big that overshadows the advantages of the body of the R8?
And last question: in case my budget is still too short, any thoughts on the R10?