Claude! The response and output have been really great for my needs. (Biotech professional who does a lot of coding and proofreading with LLM support) Answer from Deleted User on reddit.com
🌐
Zapier
zapier.com › app picks › app comparisons
Claude vs. ChatGPT: What's the difference? [2025]
May 27, 2025 - ChatGPT's broader feature set and lower API pricing make it perfect for teams and solo users who want to explore the full spectrum of AI capabilities. If you have a lot of reasons to use AI in your work, consider using both, especially given ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › claude premium vs chatgpt premium - which one?
r/datascience on Reddit: Claude Premium vs ChatGPT Premium - Which one?
October 7, 2024 -

Hi guys,

I have been researching a lot over which one to choose. While there is substantial evidence, Claude seems superior for coding, the message limits seems to vary rendering it slightly ineffective. Whereas ChatGPT seems to give similar results with slightly more limits. It also allows more than text media as well.

My main purposes will be regards to data science based coding and job hunt tasks ( proofreading, customizing resumes etc. )

What would you have chosen?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › chatgpt vs claude in 2025: am i paying for less features? (i don't use claude for coding)
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: ChatGPT vs Claude in 2025: Am I Paying for Less Features? (I don't use Claude for coding)
February 13, 2025 -

I'm new to the AI world and I'd like to get your thoughts on my dilemma.

I currently have a Claude Professional subscription (Claude 3.5 Sonnet), which I chose over ChatGPT because I found its responses more intuitive, fluid, and clear. I don't use it for coding.

However, ChatGPT now offers several features that Claude doesn't have:

  • Integrated image generation

  • Real-time information access

  • Sora (for videos)

  • Other additional features

Do you know if Claude is planning to implement similar features to stay competitive?

At this point, for my basic usage, I'm starting to think ChatGPT might be more convenient.

What experiences do you have? What do you think?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptpro › comparison between claude 3 opus and gpt4 🤔🤔🤔
r/ChatGPTPro on Reddit: Comparison between Claude 3 Opus and GPT4 🤔🤔🤔
January 10, 2024 - Honestly the Claude pro subscription of $24 a momth would be cheaper than API access for heavy users. Which sucks I wanted to be able to use Libre. But not at $6 or more a day. guess I should try haiku though.
🌐
Asad Dhamani
asad.pw › chatgpt-plus-claude-pro-vs-api-usage
ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, vs API usage
August 28, 2024 - If you are a heavy user, keep in mind that whatever OpenAI and Anthropic are charging for API access to you, they're not doing it at a loss, which means that technically, you could end up spending more than $20 per month for the same usage as ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › worth it to pay for claude pro (vs gemini or chatgpt)?
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: Worth it to Pay for Claude Pro (vs Gemini or ChatGPT)?
September 2, 2024 -

I'm a non-programmer founder of a startup. I have outsourced my app development. Prefacing to clarify I do not need to use claude for any programming or code generation requirements, and I do not know how to use Claude via API.

I have google one basic pay plan already for my personal gmail.

I used Claude extensively on free plan over last 6-8 months, but I've been frustrated like the rest of the sub with rate limits, which even on my free plan, feel lower and lower.

I mainly used claude for brainstorming - strategy, positioning, business plan, pitch deck, red-hat convo, etc. I used Gemini and Chatgpt as well on same prompts, and generally speaking Claude was much better at deep thinking and strategizing, compared to the other two, which were much better at website copy, etc.

I can definitely say over last 6 months the quality Claude has either remained the same or has a slight decrease in quality of responses, while Gemini and Chatgpt has caught up to even 90% quality responses.

I've read a few recent threads on this sub where users are facing message limits even on pro, but there are some who are using it for coding, and there are some who are suggesting turning off Artifacts / Projects to increase message limit.

I'm getting close to launch in a couple of weeks and need a dedicated virtual co-founder.

So I want to ask whether its worth paying for Claude to over-ride the message limit on the Pro Plan, for a vanilla use case like mine? I want to use it as a high-level strategic thinker / virtual co-founder, multiple times a day in one single long conversation, and my guess is over time the context input tokens requirement, because of a longer conversation, will grow larger and larger.

Again, from what I've read in the other posts people are quite frustrated with Claude limits, so I guess the answer will mostly be "no don't do it", but wondering if there are others who have had a similar use case as mine, and which LLM they ended up using.

Will appreciate any recommendations.

TIA.

Top answer
1 of 14
9
chatGPT plus would be best for this as you might appreciate opening the app and talking to it. With the new advanced mode on the way its going to get even better. But this modality would be like actually talking to another Partner in many respects. I've tried all the pro subscriptions. Claud3 is better at creating, ie code, analyzing data, excel dashboards etc. & Gemini isn't as smooth as even the base open AI voice model much more the advanced ver rolling out. So having the option to just talk and it comprehend and reply intelligently is much more effective imo. Good luck!
2 of 14
4
Why not just ask ChatGPT with websearch to get latest info. ChatGPT “When considering whether to pay for Claude Pro compared to alternatives like ChatGPT Plus or Gemini, it’s important to weigh their strengths based on your specific needs. Claude Pro is particularly strong in handling large and complex text, offering up to five times the usage capacity of its free version. This makes it ideal for tasks that require deep analysis or strategic thinking, which aligns well with your needs as a startup founder. Claude Pro also emphasizes ethical AI use, thanks to its “constitutional AI” framework, which might be appealing if you prioritize safe and aligned outputs. However, Claude Pro currently lacks some advanced features like image generation and document scanning that you might find in other models. ChatGPT Plus (using GPT-4) is known for its versatility and creativity, excelling in tasks requiring advanced reasoning and complex instruction understanding. If your work involves a lot of varied tasks that go beyond deep text analysis—like coding, brainstorming creative ideas, or needing faster general knowledge retrieval—ChatGPT might be the better choice. Gemini, on the other hand, shines in real-time information retrieval and seamless integration with Google Workspace. If your work relies heavily on these aspects or if you need AI support that integrates well with other Google services, Gemini could be the best fit. In summary, Claude Pro is likely the best option if your primary focus is on deep strategic thinking and handling large volumes of text. ChatGPT Plus might serve you better if you need a more versatile tool for a wide range of tasks. Gemini would be the go-to for tasks requiring quick information retrieval and Google integration. Ultimately, the choice depends on which features align most closely with your daily work requirements. For a more detailed comparison, you can explore the sources I consulted, such as those from Softonic, Decrypt, and VentureBeat.”
🌐
BytePlus
byteplus.com › en › topic › 558414
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude cost: 2025 pricing comparison
Developer access via the API is priced per million tokens, with distinct rates for input and output. The Claude 3 family offers a range of options, from the highly affordable Haiku model to the powerful but more expensive Opus model, allowing developers to balance cost and performance.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › claude ai vs api usage costs
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: Claude AI vs API Usage Costs
April 11, 2025 -

I’ve been using Claude AI for the past couple of weeks mainly for coding and finding it better by far than chatGPT

One annoying thing was the constant running out of usage, and today I noticed you can up to higher tiers which I did.

However as my work is getting more complex using the web interface just isn’t practically and more and need to move to using it within vscode, which I’ve just been too lazy to do.

I went to do that and realised you can’t used your ClaudeAI account and need the API account instead which is annoying.

So my question is what’s usage costs like when comparing them?

Top answer
1 of 4
3
Are you using an MCP server to let you work directly in your local directory, or are you still just using the web app or desktop app in isolation? If you're not using an MCP server, I would set one of those up and try it first before getting into a real IDE. Check out the filesystem MCP or DesktopCommander MCP. You install them simply by editing a config file.
2 of 4
2
Have been a dev for more than a decade and moved away from it until I recently gave a go at vscode x cline. Using open router (meaning a 5% surcharge) on different models, the cost through the API is definitely high. Right now I can go through 20$ a day easy and I am refraining because of the cost. If you know what you are doing and optimise your prompt to only design decisions and specific small scale debugging needs, then you can get out of it with a lot less investment. Other models are pretty interesting too, Gemini 2.5 being free is a must try, it definitely does not compare to Claude for coding, but it's free, if you are cost conscious this is a strong alternative with a lot of human intervention (so slower) There are models better than Gemini which are still cheaper than Claude but then you would have to test them to see what their limits are and when to use them for the best savings. At the end of the day you are going to balance cost vs speed. If what you are working on is not valuable or has a low ROI and your own hourly cost is low (like personal per project) then you should optimise your costs. If you are building something meant to, or already making money, and you are investing in it, Claude expensive cost is still a win given how fast it will get you to your goal.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/openai › claude has basically price matched them
r/OpenAI on Reddit: Claude has basically price matched them
September 7, 2023 - Being able to create and tweak as many custom bots as I want with both of the above models. It’s like ChatGPT’s Custom Instructions but with longer context windows (1,750 tokens for GPT4 and 4,500 for Claude 2).
🌐
Knack
knack.com › home › blog › claude vs chatgpt: ai coding, features, and pricing comparison (2025)
Claude vs ChatGPT: AI Coding, Features, and Pricing Comparison (2025)
July 26, 2025 - Both Claude and ChatGPT offer API access with token-based pricing, allowing developers to pay based on usage rather than a flat fee. ChatGPT’s API, powered by models like GPT-4 and GPT-4o-mini, provides flexible options with different price ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptpro › api - open ai v claude
r/ChatGPTPro on Reddit: API - Open AI v Claude
July 6, 2024 -

Has anyone been using either or both on a high level? Which of the two provides the most cost efficient, consistent and non robotic answers/outputs? I’m currently using 4o and even then, still outputs inconsistently for workflows like data extraction.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptpro › should i pay for chatgpt or claude at the moment?
r/ChatGPTPro on Reddit: Should I pay for ChatGPT or Claude at the moment?
May 5, 2024 -

Been using ChatGPT Plus for a few months now but hearing good things about Claude, so I was wondering if I should switch to paying for Claude

I mostly use it for either programming, very quick fact verification/research and creative writing (usually alt history)

I also prefer longer indepth responses. I kinda feel like chatgpt has been very surface level unless I really prod it to go further indepth

🌐
eWEEK
eweek.com › home › artificial intelligence
Claude 3.5 vs GPT-4: AI Chatbot Comparison (2025)
December 9, 2024 - Its API follows a usage-based pricing model starting at $1.25 per million tokens. Unlike ChatGPT, Claude’s free version becomes inaccessible after reaching the usage limits, making it less flexible.
🌐
Appy pie Automate
appypieautomate.ai › blog › claude-vs-chatgpt
Claude vs. ChatGPT: A Practical Comparison
June 30, 2025 - API Pricing (for Developers): Both Claude and ChatGPT can be accessed via API, which is usage-priced rather than a flat fee.
🌐
Merge
merge.rocks › blog › how-to-decide-on-ai-api-chatgpt-gemini-or-claude
How to decide on AI API: ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude | Merge Development
Finally, Anthropic ensures that Claude operates within a framework that prioritizes user safety and data integrity. The model employs self-supervision and adversarial testing to improve reliability and minimize biases, which are common concerns in AI development. Here’s a concise evaluation of each API based on factors such as cost, performance, and future potential.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › claude vs chatgpt
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: Claude vs ChatGPT
June 20, 2025 -

Hi everyone,

I'm currently deciding between subscribing to ChatGPT (Plus or Team) and Claude.
I mainly use AI tools for coding and analyzing academic papers, especially since I'm majoring in computer security. I often read technical books and papers, and I'm also studying digital forensics, which requires a mix of reading research papers and writing related code.

Given this, which AI tool would be more helpful for studying digital forensics and working with security-related content?
Any advice or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Top answer
1 of 5
29
For writing code, just bite the bullet and set up Claude Code with a Claude Max subscription. It is amazing.
2 of 5
20
For your educational purposes use Google’s NotebookLM Only because from personal experience both Claude and ChatGPT struggle with technical knowledge bases. The RAG system used by both to scan through documents and notes is subpar and will summarize, hallucinate, and get confused especially if it’s on finer details. NotebookLM when it comes to query of a knowledge set of flawless. I loaded 5 pretty large pdfs into Claude project and created a GPT with them in them. In both I asked questions I knew were tricky to establish a baseline. Both just struggled to get the right answer. I then broke the pdfs up into 50 separate files and made a contextual index. 20 plus hours later it still failed and only succeeded when it was basically given the answer. I read a post on Reddit about how good Notebook is but nobody talks about it because it doesn’t access the internet and do flashy stuff. I threw all 5 base PDFs in with 3 of them being 500+ pages. It nailed every question perfectly. Unlike Claude and GPT it cited sources without flaw and verbatim. Notebook is self contained and free. It can’t code, write papers, or look stuff online. But it’s crazy good at interacting with knowledge bases. So what ya do is get Claude pro and as a first project create a chrome extension that will extract your summaries and notes guides and chats with the notebook lm and feed it to an MCP for Claude to reference as you create a project based off that study material. Best of both worlds.
🌐
Writesonic
writesonic.com › home › chatgpt › claude vs. chatgpt: a detailed comparison
Claude vs. ChatGPT: A Detailed Comparison - Writesonic Blog
May 18, 2025 - My thorough testing of Claude and ChatGPT shows clear differences in what they can do best. Claude performs better at technical tasks, code generation, and detailed analysis. It also offers stronger privacy protection and competitive API pricing.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › am i the only one who can't go back to chatgpt once addicted to claude?
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: Am I the only one who can't go back to ChatGPT once addicted to Claude?
2 weeks ago -

I've been a ChatGPT user since the very beginning (late 2022) and jumped on the paid Plus version as soon as they offered it in 2023. I knew there were competitors stepping up their game like Claude, Gemini, Grok, but I never gave them a try.

Until two months ago, because I was getting increasingly disappointed with ChatGPT's responses on my more complex projects.

When I gave Claude Sonnet 4.5 a try, I immediately had a "Eureka" moment, really blown away by its capability on large and complex projects, navigating various files with exceptional understanding and output that ChatGPT was never able to match. It provides truly actionable answers and solutions I hadn't even asked for yet, as if it was reading my mind ahead of time lol.

And now with Claude Opus 4.5, which goes even further. Whether it's for code, writing technical documents, or entirely reorganizing large-scale projects.

I'm really down the rabbit hole, took the Claude Pro Max subscription and cancelled my ChatGPT Plus subscription because it doesn't bring me anything anymore, despite the recent 5.2 that I tried. I feel like I'm getting responses that fall way short of Claude Opus 4.5, despite all the hype ChatGPT gets.

To be clear, I don't want to bash ChatGPT, I think they deserve some credit as the first mover. But I think there's a disconnect between the hype around it (with some valuations at $1T) and the reality, which shows that Claude is clearly better in my opinion.