As a subscriber to both Claude and ChatGPT, I've been comparing their performance to decide which one to keep. Here's my experience:

Coding: As a programmer, I've found Claude to be exceptionally impressive. In my experience, it consistently produces nearly bug-free code on the first try, outperforming GPT-4 in this area.

Text Summarization: I recently tested both models on summarizing a PDF of my monthly spending transactions. Claude's summary was not only more accurate but also delivered in a smart, human-like style. In contrast, GPT-4's summary contained errors and felt robotic and unengaging.

Overall Experience: While I was initially excited about GPT-4's release (ChatGPT was my first-ever online subscription), using Claude has changed my perspective. Returning to GPT-4 after using Claude feels like a step backward, reminiscent of using GPT-3.5.

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet has impressed me with its coding prowess, accurate summarization, and natural communication style. It's challenging my assumption that GPT-4 is the current "state of the art" in AI language models.

I'm curious to hear about others' experiences. Have you used both models? How do they compare in your use cases?

I swear Claude has an army of bots posting how much better it is than OpenAI.

I use both, all day every day for programming, switching back and forth. Sometimes one can help me get to the next step while the other can't. Sometimes it takes both.

But, in no way, IMHO, is Claude Sonnet 3.5 vastly better than OpenAI GPT 4o.

"Speechless", "The difference is insane", and so on... What the hell?

It's more like "yeah, it's ok", or "it's comparable".

Am I being trolled? Is everyone here a bot? Anyone else notice this or do you think I'm out to lunch?!?