🌐
Anthropic
anthropic.com › news › claude-opus-4-5
Introducing Claude Opus 4.5
Overall, our testers told us that Opus 4.5 just “gets it.” · Many of our customers with early access have had similar experiences. Here are some examples of what they told us: Opus models have always been “the real SOTA” but have been cost prohibitive in the past.
🌐
ClaudeLog
claudelog.com › home › faqs › sonnet vs opus
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Opus for Claude Code - Performance Comparison | ClaudeLog
Cost Optimization - Claude Opus 4.5 costs approximately 67% less than Opus 4.1 ($5/$25 vs $15/$75), but still more than Sonnet 4.5.
People also ask

What's the difference between Claude Sonnet 4 and Opus 4?
Opus 4 is the premium model for complex, long running tasks that can work autonomously for hours. Sonnet 4 balances performance with efficiency for everyday use. For most non developer projects, Sonnet 4 is sufficient and more cost effective.
🌐
socialgains.co.uk
socialgains.co.uk › claude-4-opus-vs-sonnet-complete-2025-comparison-guide
Claude 4 Opus vs Sonnet: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4 for free?
Yes, Claude Sonnet 4 is available to free users on Claude.ai, iOS, and Android. However, the extended thinking feature is only available on paid plans (Pro, Team, Enterprise). For serious software projects, the extended thinking feature is particularly valuable.
🌐
socialgains.co.uk
socialgains.co.uk › claude-4-opus-vs-sonnet-complete-2025-comparison-guide
Claude 4 Opus vs Sonnet: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide
Do I still need to hire developers if I use Claude 4?
Yes, for any serious software project. Claude 4 helps you work with developers more effectively, not replace them. Think of it as a technical translator between your business requirements and developer implementation.
🌐
socialgains.co.uk
socialgains.co.uk › claude-4-opus-vs-sonnet-complete-2025-comparison-guide
Claude 4 Opus vs Sonnet: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide
🌐
Adaline
labs.adaline.ai › p › claude-4
Claude 4 Models for Product Teams: Sonnet vs Opus Comparison Guide
August 22, 2025 - This leads to either overspending or underwhelming results. Choose Sonnet 4 for daily development at $3/$15 per million tokens, and Opus 4.1 for complex reasoning at $15/$75 when accuracy justifies 5x cost.
🌐
Vertu
vertu.com › best post › claude opus 4.5 vs sonnet 4.5 vs opus 4.1: the evolution of anthropic’s ai models
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Sonnet 4.5: Pricing Revolution & Performance Comparison | Anthropic
November 25, 2025 - The hierarchy is restored: Opus 4.5 successfully re-establishes the premium tier's value proposition, enabling tasks that defeat Sonnet 4.5 while remaining cost-competitive with alternatives.
🌐
Live Chat AI
livechatai.com › claude-opus-4-pricing-calculator
Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator - Compare Sonnet 4 & Opus 4 Costs
Estimate Claude Opus 4 API costs in seconds. This free pricing calculator shows & compares Opus 4 vs. Sonnet 4, GPT‑4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and OpenAI o3.
🌐
Socialgains
socialgains.co.uk › claude-4-opus-vs-sonnet-complete-2025-comparison-guide
Claude 4 Opus vs Sonnet: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide
May 25, 2025 - Claude Opus 4 costs $15 per million input tokens and $75 per million output tokens. For most discovery and specification work, this translates to pennies per page of analysis. Claude Sonnet 4 maintains pricing at $3 per million input tokens ...
🌐
Data Studios
datastudios.org › post › claude-opus-4-5-vs-claude-sonnet-4-5-model-differences-pricing-structure-context-windows-and-mor
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: Model Differences, Pricing Structure, Context Windows, and more
November 25, 2025 - Sonnet 4.5 performs extremely well in practical coding, summarization, spreadsheet manipulation, short-to-medium reasoning and content generation — often delivering 90–95% of Opus’s performance at significantly reduced cost.
🌐
Anthropic
anthropic.com › claude › opus
Claude Opus 4.5
A clear step forward from Sonnet 4.5. Claude Opus 4.5 handles long-horizon coding tasks more efficiently than any model we’ve tested. It achieves higher pass rates on held-out tests while using up to 65% fewer tokens, giving developers real cost control without sacrificing quality.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Eden AI
edenai.co › post › claude-sonnet-4-vs-claude-opus-4
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Opus 4
Claude Sonnet 4 is significantly more cost-effective than Claude Opus 4 with a difference of 80%. Both input and output tokens are 5 times cheaper with Sonnet 4 ($3 input, $15 output) versus Opus 4 ($15 input, $75 output).
🌐
Laozhang
blog.laozhang.ai › ai-models › claude-opus-4-vs-sonnet-4-complete-comparison-guide
Claude Opus 4 vs Sonnet 4: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide – Performance, Pricing & Best Use Cases – LaoZhang-AI
Many teams use Sonnet 4 for routine tasks and Opus 4 for complex challenges. LaoZhang.ai’s unified API makes it easy to switch between models. Claude Sonnet 4 is ideal for beginners – it’s available on the free tier, faster, and handles most tasks excellently while being more cost-effective for learning.
🌐
Simon Willison
simonwillison.net › 2025 › May › 22 › updated-anthropic-models
Updated Anthropic model comparison table
May 22, 2025 - Claude 3 Haiku is still in that ... the same price as Sonnet 3.7 ($3/million input, $15/million output). Opus 4 matches the pricing of the older Opus 3 - $15/million for input and $75/million for output....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudecode › maybe opus 4.5 is even cheaper than sonnet 4.5
r/ClaudeCode on Reddit: Maybe Opus 4.5 is even cheaper than Sonnet 4.5
1 month ago -

I am on the Max plan ($100) and quite happy with Opus 4.5 so far. I have decided to go into a self-hackathon mode to work on one of my projects tonight.

I started at 22:30 with 0% usage of the 5-hour limit.

I turned off the thinking mode, hoping that Opus 4.5 usage will last longer. I have two sessions open at the same time to work on two different features. So far so good for the first 2.5 hours. I checked the progress, and it told me that I had used 67% of the 5-hour limit.

So, I switched to Sonnet 4.5 with the hope that I could last until the next 5-hour window. I can clearly see that the quality and speed were a little lower compared with Opus 4.5; I had to provide more instructions.

To my surprise, I hit the limit faster than I expected.

My guess is that Opus 4.5 follows instructions better, leading to fewer retries and much fewer tokens spent.

So, in the end, maybe Opus 4.5 is even cheaper than Sonnet 4.5.

🌐
Live Chat AI
livechatai.com › claude-sonnet-4-pricing-calculator
Claude Sonnet 4 Pricing Calculator - Compare Opus 4 & Sonnet 4 Costs
All prices and benchmarks sourced from Anthropic’s “Introducing Claude 4” launch (22 May 2025) and public model cards from OpenAI and Google. ... Sonnet 4 is significantly more affordable—$3/M input tokens and $15/M output, compared ...
🌐
Anthropic
anthropic.com › news › claude-4
Introducing Claude 4
Pricing remains consistent with previous Opus and Sonnet models: Opus 4 at $15/$75 per million tokens (input/output) and Sonnet 4 at $3/$15. Claude Opus 4 is our most powerful model yet and the best coding model in the world, leading on SWE-bench (72.5%) and Terminal-bench (43.2%).
🌐
Langcopilot
langcopilot.com › home › ai tools › claude opus 4.1 (legacy) vs claude sonnet 4
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4 Pricing Comparison
September 22, 2025 - Claude Sonnet 4 pricing: $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. Context window: 200,000 tokens. ... Per 1K tokens: Claude Opus 4.1 (Legacy) costs $0.0150 input / $0.0750 output. Claude Sonnet 4 costs $0.0030 input / $0.0150 output.
🌐
Creole Studios
creolestudios.com › home › claude opus 4 or sonnet 4? how to choose the right ai for your workflow
Claude Opus 4 vs Sonnet 4: Pick the Right AI Model
September 23, 2025 - Let’s compare how much it would cost to process 1 million input tokens and generate 1 million output tokens with each model: Insight: Claude Opus 4 is 5x more expensive than Sonnet 4, but may be worth the cost if your use case demands precision, ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/claudeai › opus 4 vs sonnet 4
r/ClaudeAI on Reddit: Opus 4 vs Sonnet 4
May 26, 2025 -

I work in quantitative finance, so most of my programming revolves around building financial tools that detect and exploit market anomalies. The coding I do is highly theoretical and often based on insights from academic finance research.

I’m currently exploring different models to help me reason through and validate my approaches. Does anyone have experience using Opus 4 of Sonnet 4 for this kind of work? I’m trying to figure out what is the best fit for my use case.

🌐
Keywordsai
keywordsai.co › blog › claude-sonnet-4-vs-claude-opus-4-a-comprehensive-comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Opus 4: A comprehensive ...
Sonnet performs well, but in tricky cases (e.g. nested hypotheticals or math word problems), it can fail silently or misstep, while Opus stays grounded. Both models are nearly tied in accuracy across arithmetic, algebra, and symbolic problems. In tests like solving systems of equations or parsing LaTeX-style math, performance is consistent—making Sonnet a capable, fast option. Claude 4 Sonnet is ideal for general-purpose and high-volume tasks. Its fast response mode and lower cost make it a great fit for interactive chatbots, customer support assistants, content creation, and daily coding help.
🌐
Sider
sider.ai › blog › ai-tools › claude-sonnet-4_5-vs-claude-opus-4_1-capability-cost-curves-and-the-ai-strategy-frontier
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.1: Capability, Cost Curves, and the AI Strategy Frontier
Opus 4.1 pushes the reasoning frontier further—more consistent multi-step logic, better tool-augmented problem solving, and improved performance on long-context synthesis—at a higher implied cost per token and generally higher latency. Claude Sonnet 4.5: Tuned for high-throughput ...