the Supreme Court stated that the ... when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Essentially, ...

The meaning of CLEARLY ERRONEOUS is being or containing a finding of fact that is not supported by substantial or competent evidence or by reasonable inferences. How to use clearly erroneous in a sentence.

January 28, 2013 - : being or containing a finding of fact that is not supported by substantial or competent evidence or by reasonable inferences [findings of fact…shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous “Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 52(a)”] ...

clearly erroneous - A review standard in civil appeals where an appellate court respects the factual findings of a lower court unless it strongly believes a mistake has been made

In the United States v. United ... when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Essentially, ...

The clearly erroneous standard is a legal principle used by appellate courts when reviewing a trial court's findings of fact. Under this standard, an appellate court will overturn a trial court's decision only if it has a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made regarding the ...

Nolo was born in 1971 as a publisher of self-help legal books. Guided by the motto “law for all,” our attorney authors and editors have been explaining the law to everyday people ever since. Learn more about our history and our editorial standards · Each article that we publish has been ...

P. 52(a). A district court's findings are clearly erroneous if substantial credible evidence does not support them, if the district court has misapprehended the effect of the evidence or if a review of the record leaves this Court with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been ...

December 5, 2025 - Under the "clearly erroneous" standard, where a trial court (as opposed to a jury or administrative agency) makes a finding of fact, such as in a bench trial, that finding will not be disturbed unless the appellate court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed...

August 3, 2024 - clearly erroneous standard – Applies during appellate review of a finding of fact and requires reversal if there’s definitely not enough credible evidence to support the finding of fact.

Clearly Erroneous definition: The standard that an appellate court normally uses to review a trial judge’s findings of fact when a civil case that was tried without a jury is appealed. The appellate court may not reverse the decision merely because, based on the facts, it would have reached a different conclusion.

deference.”4 The Supreme Court defined the standard as: “A finding is ‘clearly erroneous’ when

When the appellant contends that findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous, the reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether the trial court’s findings can pass muster. The question on review is not simply whether the reviewing court would have found otherwise, but whether the trial court could permissibly find as it did.

January 4, 2021 - A finding is “clearly erroneous” when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.

In such circumstances, the transaction will be found to be clearly erroneous if the price of the transaction to buy (sell) that is the subject of the complaint is greater than (less than) the Reference Price (as described below), by an amount that equals or exceeds the applicable Percentage Parameter defined in Appendix A to the LULD Plan (“Percentage Parameters”)

A "clearly erroneous" transaction is defined as an execution on an order that was entered in error (e.g., in terms of price, quantity or symbol) and at a price substantially away from, or inconsistent with, the prevailing market for that security at the time of execution.

The standard of review appellate courts typically use when reviewing a trial court's findings of fact. Review under the clearly erroneous standard is significantly deferential.

Navigate law school with LSD.Law. Access application tracking, admission data, school rankings, case briefs, a simple legal dictionary, and more. Trusted by 175k+ users.

For a factual finding to be considered clearly erroneous, the reviewing court must be left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made, based on the entire record. Clearly erroneous is a more stringent standard than the abuse of discretion standard, which allows for reversal ...