They are the same thing. They'll is a contraction of They will. They'll be a the party = They will be at the party. Answer from MetRon on hinative.com
🌐
Sarah Townsend Editorial
sarahtownsendeditorial.co.uk › read my blog › there’ll vs they’ll: simple tips to help you remember
There'll vs they'll: simple tips to help you remember - Sarah Townsend Editorial
August 2, 2019 - “There’ll be blue birds over the white cliffs of Dover” = “There will be blue birds over the white cliffs of Dover” · THEY’LL is a contraction of the words they + will = they’ll.
🌐
YouTube
youtube.com › english with lucy
How to pronounce the contractions in English - we'd | they'll | he'd | they're | it'd - YouTube
Learn how to pronounce and use contractions like I'M, WE'D, THEY'LL, WE'RE, THEY'RE, HE'D, IT'D. I will teach you the correct usage and pronunciation of thes...
Published   June 22, 2022
Views   603K
People also ask

What is the difference between an abbreviation and a contraction?
Abbreviations and contractions are both used to shorten a word, but in different ways. · An abbreviation is formed using the initial letters (or sometimes other parts) of a longer word or phrase to represent the whole. Common examples include “Mr.” for “Mister,” “Dr.” for “Doctor,” and “NASA” for “National Aeronautics and Space Administration.” They are used in formal writing as well as everyday conversations. · A contraction, on the other hand, is formed by combining two words and omitting one or more letters. The deleted letters are replaced with an apostrophe (e.g., “cannot” becomes “can’t”
🌐
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
What is the difference between a contraction and a portmanteau?
Contractions and portmanteaus are similar in that they are both formed by combining two words and omitting some letters. However, there is a difference between them: · Contractions usually combine two words that are often used together (e.g., “do not” becomes “don’t”). A contraction has the same meaning as its uncontracted form. · A portmanteau is formed by blending two words together to create a new word with a different meaning. For example, “brunch” is a combination of “breakfast” and “lunch.” This is also called a neologism.
🌐
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
What are contractions (words)?
Contractions are short words that are made by combining two words. This is often done by deleting certain letters and replacing them with an apostrophe (e.g., “do not” becomes “don’t”). · Although contractions are common in everyday speech, they should generally be avoided in formal or academic writing. However, there are exceptions (e.g., when writing dialogue in a story or directly quoting an author who uses contractions in your paper). · A good rule of thumb is to consider your audience and the intended effect of your writing when deciding whether to use contractions.
🌐
scribbr.com
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
🌐
San Jose State University
sjsu.edu › writingcenter › docs › handouts › Contractions.pdf pdf
San José State University Writing Center www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter
is often confused with “its,” a possessive pronoun. Remember, ... Contractions, Fall 2011. Rev. Summer 2014. ... Here they are used in sentences.
🌐
engVid
engvid.com › contractions-for-have-be-would-will
CONTRACTIONS for HAVE, BE, WOULD, WILL: ’d, ’s, ’ve, ’re, ’m, ’ll engVid
Using contractions is an essential part of sounding like a native English speaker. Some contractions are easier to understand than others. For example, “I will” becomes “I’ll”, and “I am” becomes “I’m”. But when looking at the contractions ’s and ’d, the many possibilities can lead to confusion.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Quora
quora.com › Is-thatll-a-proper-grammatical-contraction-for-that-will
Is 'that'll' a proper grammatical contraction for 'that will'? - Quora
Answer (1 of 20): Yes and no. Yes in that historically it represents a contraction of “that will”. Yes in that that contraction is standardly written as “that’ll” when it’s important to convey that the short form is intended. (Compare: “there’re” which has never become standard ...
🌐
Scribbr
scribbr.com › home › contractions (grammar) | definition & examples
Contractions (Grammar) | Definition & Examples
May 2, 2025 - You can practice your understanding of contractions with the following questions. Fill in the correct answer: ... I (hadn’t/had’n’t) ____ seen them for a long time, and one day we ran into each other at the supermarket. I (do’t/don’t)__ know (who’s/whose) ____ idea this was, but it was a terrible one. ... They (will ...
🌐
Enchanted Learning
enchantedlearning.com › grammar › contractions › index.shtml
Contractions - Enchanted Learning
March 9, 2006 - A multiple choice comprehension printable quiz about Contractions for early readers. Words: I’ll, we’re, you’d, don’t, isn’t, it’s, you’re, she’d, they’re, won’t.
🌐
Grammarly
grammarly.com › blog › grammar › contractions
What Are Contractions in Writing? Definition and Examples | Grammarly
August 10, 2022 - Contractions are a kind of abbreviation that combines two or more words by removing certain letters and usually adding an apostrophe. Only certain words can be contracted: typically small and common words (not, is/are), especially pronouns (I, he/she/it, they), and modal verbs (can, will, might, must, should, would, could).
🌐
Cambridge Dictionary
dictionary.cambridge.org › dictionary › english › they-ll
THEY'LL | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
THEY'LL definition: 1. short form of they will: 2. short form of they will: 3. contraction of they will or they…. Learn more.
🌐
GCFGlobal
edu.gcfglobal.org › en › grammar › contractions › 1
Grammar: Contractions
In English, there are a fairly small number of contractions, and they're all made out of common words. Here are some of the contractions you'll see the most: You might have noticed that the word won't is a little different from the other contractions. It means will not, even though the word ...
🌐
WordReference
forum.wordreference.com › english only › english only
contraction of will with names/nouns | WordReference Forums
December 12, 2021 - In fact we probably use contractions in this context more than we use 'will'. ... They're different from contractions with pronouns. In I'll, we'll, she'll, they'll etc. the /l/ is just a consonant: the contracted form I'll or they'll is a single syllable. We don't do exactly this with (other) nouns. We often leave off the /w/ and reduce the vowel to a weak vowel, but 'll is still a separate syllable even after a vowel: Mary'll would be three syllables.
🌐
TalkEnglish
talkenglish.com › video › lessondetails.aspx
Future Verb Tense - Contractions - Learn English Grammar
Free English grammar lesson that covers contractions used in the future verb tense in English
Top answer
1 of 3
10

Short answer: yes. It'll be understood, and if it's seen as a mistake, it'd be one of register rather than of grammar.

Longer answer: contractions are informal by nature, so if you're asking about formal written English, then any contraction is frowned upon, whether it's "it's", "you're", or "John'll".

So we're clearly talking about less-than-formal English, where the rules (such as they are) get fuzzy.

  • In spoken English, contractions are totally fair game. In fact, you really have to pay attention to even notice whether someone said "I am" or "I'm". The difference between "John will" and "John'll" is a bit more audible, but it's still perfectly fine to say the latter rather than the former.

  • In written English, the contractions you choose to use, or not use, determine the level of informality. In this sense, "John'll" is a bit more informal than "you're", but there are very few contexts where the latter would be acceptable while the former wouldn't be.

Bottom line is, in an informal context such as a video game, usage such as "John'll" simply adds to the colloquial, informal nature of the dialogue/narration. It is not, in and of itself, a mistake.

2 of 3
1

If this is for dialogue in a video game, then why would it matter if it's formally correct?

What are you striving for? To mimic the way the characters would actually communicate? Or to write a script that would pass for formal prose?

Authors such as Mark Twain, Stephen King, and Harper Lee often used constructs like this to add a sense of realism to the dialogue in their books, knowing that people often speak in a less formal way than they might write polished text.

“Let him alone,” said Stuart Mordaunt. “His brother's absence has upset him, but Jim'll come round all right.” (Mr. Groby's Slippery Gift by Paul Laurence Dunbar)

“I think that cat'll outlive us all,” I said and patted Tim on the shoulder. (Night and the Cat by Alan Adler)

By striking such contractions from the video game, you run the risk of having language that might sound artificial and contrived.


Incidentally, this is why you were asked about where you would use this, and why “people seemed to care.” If you were presenting at an academic conference, I think it would be a terrible idea to write Dave'll go next on one of your presentation slides. But that doesn't mean such informal phrasing should be removed from a video game dialogue. The theives in Grand Theft Auto don't generally speak like English gentlemen.

When you don't provide adequate context, the community cannot provide an accurate answer.

🌐
Quora
quora.com › What-is-the-difference-between-the-contractions-itll-and-it-will
What is the difference between the contractions 'it'll' and 'it will'? - Quora
Answer (1 of 2): Only one of them is a contraction. “It’ll” is the contraction of “It will”. There is no difference in meaning. The shortened form may be used - like any contraction - in informal language, but we seldom use contractions in formal language, whether written or spoken.