GitHub
gist.github.com › qoomon › 5dfcdf8eec66a051ecd85625518cfd13
Conventional Commits Cheatsheet · GitHub
Many Git providers and tools display only the first line of a commit message in history views by default, making it much easier to quickly scan commits and associate them with their corresponding issues without needing to open each commit individually. Another example is a command such as git log --left-right --oneline A...B which is a standard way of comparing commits between branches, and having issue identifiers in the first line of commits provides clear practical value.
Conventional Commits
conventionalcommits.org › en › v1.0.0
Conventional Commits
Any casing may be used, but it’s best to be consistent. Go back and make multiple commits whenever possible. Part of the benefit of Conventional Commits is its ability to drive us to make more organized commits and PRs.
Conventional Commits: A Standardized Approach to Commit Messages
I dislike it. So I will not use it. More on reddit.com
19
0
March 21, 2025How to deal with multiple conventional commits in one feature branch?
Code review should be done before you merge the changes/PR into the master branch; and squashing/--fixup can be done after codereview, during that final merge. So my workflow would look like this: develop a feature, make many many commits clean up commits and messages with interactive rebase (not necessarily squash into one commit only, but give logical structure of several commits if possible) make a PR/ask for code review update PR with successive commits (maybe using commit --fixup) codereview done: clean up code and/or squash into one commit, according to your branching workflow merge PR, maybe adjust version number More on reddit.com
6
2
April 21, 2023Which "Conventional Commit" Type To Use When Just Adding Comments To Source File?
refactor - did the code change? No. The code before and after the change is identical. style - is the style of the code updated? Changes to whitespace, line spacing, application of a .editorconfig? Nope. There are no diffs that will be on lines of code that change the format of the code. docs - is there information about the functionality of the code added or updated? Yep. docs it should be. If you are a fan of gitmoji (I am not - but its something some people seem to like) https://gitmoji.dev 📝 :memo: Add or update documentation. None of the other gitmoji apply. More on reddit.com
4
0
March 28, 2023Some confusion about Conventional Commits
CI stands for continuous integration (think automated build and test scripts for every commit) They are called conventional commits because these are no hard rules, but more like … guidelines. The most important part is to stay consistent, apart from that every project has to figure out by themselves if, how many and what types they need. The angular project apparently has seven different types, but maybe you can do with two or three only. Or maybe you need 20, then invent them and set appropriate guidelines for your team. It all depends on why you need the conventional commits approach and what exactly you want to use them for. (imho: if you only want to do this because it looks nice, not because you absolutely need to do any filtering based on scope or type, then you probably don't need to do conventional commits and they are just a massive, useless overhead for the entire team. A lot of projects do just fine without them. And if you find that some internal conventions emerge naturally as developement goes on, that's fine, too. But don't force it if not necessary.) More on reddit.com
1
2
November 10, 2023Videos
06:21
11. Conventional Commits and Best Practices - YouTube
02:51
Master Git Commit Messages with Conventional Commits - YouTube
01:18:20
git commit message and Conventional Commits - YouTube
04:08
Write git commit messages like a PRO with Conventional Commits ...
17:14
What Are Conventional Commits? Full Tutorial + Pre-Commit & ...
r/git on Reddit: How to write good git commit messages with ...
BAVAGA
bavaga.com › blog › 2025 › 01 › 27 › my-ultimate-conventional-commit-types-cheatsheet
My Ultimate Cheatsheet for Conventional Commit Types: Simplified for Everyday Use | BAVAGA
January 27, 2025 - To simplify things for myself (and maybe for you), I decided to create a personal cheatsheet. After doing some research and reviewing repositories listed on the conventional commits site, I compiled the most commonly used commit types and their respective use cases.
Marc Nuri
blog.marcnuri.com › home › conventional commits: a complete guide to better git commit messages
Conventional Commits: A Complete Guide to Better Git Commit Messages - Marc Nuri
November 3, 2019 - Learn to write better Git commit messages with Conventional Commits spec, examples, tooling, and changelog/version automation.
Enlume
enlume.com › blogs › mastering-commit-messages-a-guide-to-conventional-commits-and-best-practices
Mastering commit messages: A guide to Conventional Commits and best practices
This approach encourages developers to adhere to a consistent pattern, fostering clarity and streamlining collaboration. Each commit message adheres to a defined structure, typically consisting of: A concise summary: This opening line captures the essence of the change introduced in the commit.
DEV Community
dev.to › tene › mastering-conventional-commits-structure-benefits-and-tools-3cpo
Mastering Conventional Commits: Structure, Benefits, and Tools - DEV Community
June 3, 2025 - This format uses a simple pattern ([optional scope]: ) to make commit history both human and machine friendly. By consistently tagging commits as features, fixes, docs updates, etc., teams can automatically generate changelogs, bump versions, ...
Reddit
reddit.com › r/git › conventional commits: a standardized approach to commit messages
r/git on Reddit: Conventional Commits: A Standardized Approach to Commit Messages
March 21, 2025 -
This article provides a clear and concise overview of Conventional Commits, highlighting its benefits and practical implementation.
Is adopting Conventional Commits a definitive "yes" for all software projects, or are there scenarios where it might not be the ideal approach?
Top answer 1 of 5
11
I dislike it. So I will not use it.
2 of 5
9
Don't tag your commits with "type of change". It's useless subjective noise, and you shouldn't be splitting your commits by type. Do what the Git project does: https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L266
Maggomann
maggomann.github.io › knowledge-base › en › best-practice › coding-standards › conventional-commits
Conventional Commits - knowledge-base
However, if you decide to use parentheses in the prefix, you should make sure that this is clearly stated in your project's documentation so that all developers working on the project can follow the same convention. If you decide not to use parentheses in the prefix, however, it is important that you write a clear and consistent commit description that states the purpose and scope of the change, so that other developers can easily understand and track the change as described above.
DEV Community
dev.to › dev__insights › a-developers-guide-to-conventional-commits-3p70
Git Commit Message Best Practices: Conventional Commits Explained - DEV Community
June 20, 2025 - Semantic versioning - Automatically bump version numbers based on commit types · Better code reviews - Reviewers know what to expect before diving in · Searchable history - git log --grep="feat" to find all new features · Team sanity - Your future self (and teammates) will thank you ... feat(auth): add password reset functionality fix(api): resolve timeout issue in user endpoint docs(readme): add installation instructions · What's your experience with conventional commits?
Conventional Commits
conventionalcommits.org › en › v1.0.0-beta.4
Angular conventional commits
Any casing may be used, but it’s best to be consistent. Go back and make multiple commits whenever possible. Part of the benefit of Conventional Commits is its ability to drive us to make more organized commits and PRs.
LTER
lternet.edu › home › stories › databits: conventional commits
DataBits: Conventional Commits - LTER
December 16, 2024 - For example, if issue #3 outlines the team’s plan to add more comments into the existing scripts (to make them more transparent) the commit message might be “style: adding comments to all project scripts (see #3)”. A good example of this in practice comes from Michael Kennedy who has a repository aimed at teaching intermediate Python coders how they might standardize the syntax and structure of their code to align with best practice. He makes extensive use of this shorthand for referencing GitHub issues–though he does not adhere to Conventional Commits’ framework elsewhere.
DEV Community
dev.to › itxshakil › commit-like-a-pro-a-beginners-guide-to-conventional-commits-34c3
Commit Like a Pro: A Beginner’s Guide to Conventional Commits - DEV Community
February 5, 2025 - Conventional Commits is a specification ... system helps eliminate confusion and promotes better collaboration by keeping your commit history clear and consistent....
Platform Uno
platform.uno › docs › articles › uno-development › git-conventional-commits.html
Conventional Commits
chore: a catch-all type for any other commits. For instance, if you're implementing a single feature and it makes sense to divide the work into multiple commits, you should mark one commit as feat and the rest as chore.
Medium
medium.com › neudesic-innovation › conventional-commits-a-better-way-78d6785c2e08
Conventional Commits: A Better Way | by Michael Collins | Neudesic Innovation | Medium
January 23, 2022 - In this post, I present the concepts of the Conventional Commits specification and discuss how better commits can improve the history of Git repositories.
Openedx
docs.openedx.org › projects › openedx-proposals › en › latest › best-practices › oep-0051-bp-conventional-commits.html
OEP-51: Conventional Commits — Open edX Proposals 1.0 documentation
If a commit mixes types, use the most important type label in the commit message. The priority order for the types is generally: revert, feat, fix, perf, docs, test, build, refactor, style, chore, temp. See the tooling section for some practical exceptions around conventional commit linting ...
Eagerworks
eagerworks.com › blog › conventional-commits
From chaos to clarity: the power of Conventional Commits
September 12, 2023 - It involves a set of rules and guidelines that provide a structured format for commit messages, making them more readable, informative, and standardized across development teams. By categorizing the nature of changes made in a commit, Conventional Commits promotes good coding practices and ...
ReleasePad
releasepad.io › blog › conventional-commits-developers-guide-to-better-changelogs
Conventional Commits: The Developer’s Guide to Better Changelogs | ReleasePad
1 week ago - For teams using PRs seriously, the PR is often the better source for changelog generation. Conventional commits work best when commits and PRs are both well-written, not as a substitute for good PRs.
Hrekov
hrekov.com › blog › commits-rules
Conventional Commits Cheat Sheet 2026 | Backend APIs, Web Apps, Bots & Automation | Hrekov
4 days ago - The 50/72 Rule: While not strictly part of the Conventional Commits spec, this Git best practice is universally expected: keep the description (subject line) under 50 characters to prevent truncation, and wrap the body at 72 characters.
Medium
medium.com › @avdunusinghe › mastering-conventional-commit-messages-a-guide-for-developers-9cca075eab00
Mastering Conventional Commit Messages: A Guide for Developers | by Ashen Dunusinghe | Medium
February 2, 2025 - If a bug is introduced, you can trace it back to a specific commit more easily. The structured format helps you understand the context of the change and why it was made. ... Start by introducing the concept to your team. Share resources, examples, and the benefits of using Conventional Commit Messages.
DEV Community
dev.to › boonyaritiamsaard › conventional-commit-types-a-rule-of-thumb-guide-1cha
Conventional Commit Types: A Rule of Thumb Guide - DEV Community
April 16, 2025 - Is it adding value (feat), fixing something (fix), improving internals (refactor, perf), ensuring quality (test), managing the build/pipeline (build, ci), tidying up (style, chore), or explaining things (docs)?