What you see is just the default string representation with 6 decimal places. You can set you own display format option with
pd.options.display.float_format = '{:.10f}'.format
to show 10 places.
Alternatively you can confirm the number if you look at the result of say df.loc[1,'lng'].
To set the option only temporarily you can use an option context:
with pd.option_context('display.float_format', '{:.10f}'.format):
print(df)
Answer from Stef on Stack Overflowpython - Converting strings to floats in a DataFrame - Stack Overflow
How I convert float to string in this case?
pandas - How to convert datatype:object to float64 in python? - Stack Overflow
python - Convert a string list to float32 efficiently - Stack Overflow
Videos
NOTE:
pd.convert_objectshas now been deprecated. You should usepd.Series.astype(float)orpd.to_numericas described in other answers.
This is available in 0.11. Forces conversion (or set's to nan)
This will work even when astype will fail; its also series by series
so it won't convert say a complete string column
In [10]: df = DataFrame(dict(A = Series(['1.0','1']), B = Series(['1.0','foo'])))
In [11]: df
Out[11]:
A B
0 1.0 1.0
1 1 foo
In [12]: df.dtypes
Out[12]:
A object
B object
dtype: object
In [13]: df.convert_objects(convert_numeric=True)
Out[13]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 NaN
In [14]: df.convert_objects(convert_numeric=True).dtypes
Out[14]:
A float64
B float64
dtype: object
You can try df.column_name = df.column_name.astype(float). As for the NaN values, you need to specify how they should be converted, but you can use the .fillna method to do it.
Example:
In [12]: df
Out[12]:
a b
0 0.1 0.2
1 NaN 0.3
2 0.4 0.5
In [13]: df.a.values
Out[13]: array(['0.1', nan, '0.4'], dtype=object)
In [14]: df.a = df.a.astype(float).fillna(0.0)
In [15]: df
Out[15]:
a b
0 0.1 0.2
1 0.0 0.3
2 0.4 0.5
In [16]: df.a.values
Out[16]: array([ 0.1, 0. , 0.4])
I tried
n1=input('First number')
n2=input('Second number')
sum = float(n1) + float(n2)
str(sum)
print('The sum of the values is: ' + sum)My error is:
TypeError: can only concatenate str (not "float") to str
I tried googling this error and got some answers like print(f' which I didn't really understand, and some others that looked a little complicated, I am very new.
I am trying to improve my googling skills.
You can convert most of the columns by just calling convert_objects:
In [36]:
df = df.convert_objects(convert_numeric=True)
df.dtypes
Out[36]:
Date object
WD int64
Manpower float64
2nd object
CTR object
2ndU float64
T1 int64
T2 int64
T3 int64
T4 float64
dtype: object
For column '2nd' and 'CTR' we can call the vectorised str methods to replace the thousands separator and remove the '%' sign and then astype to convert:
In [39]:
df['2nd'] = df['2nd'].str.replace(',','').astype(int)
df['CTR'] = df['CTR'].str.replace('%','').astype(np.float64)
df.dtypes
Out[39]:
Date object
WD int64
Manpower float64
2nd int32
CTR float64
2ndU float64
T1 int64
T2 int64
T3 int64
T4 object
dtype: object
In [40]:
df.head()
Out[40]:
Date WD Manpower 2nd CTR 2ndU T1 ใใT2 T3 T4
0 2013/4/6 6 NaN 2645 5.27 0.29 407 533 454 368
1 2013/4/7 7 NaN 2118 5.89 0.31 257 659 583 369
2 2013/4/13 6 NaN 2470 5.38 0.29 354 531 473 ใใ383
3 2013/4/14 7 NaN 2033 6.77 0.37 396 748 681 458
4 2013/4/20 6 NaN 2690 5.38 0.29 361 528 541 381
Or you can do the string handling operations above without the call to astype and then call convert_objects to convert everything in one go.
UPDATE
Since version 0.17.0 convert_objects is deprecated and there isn't a top-level function to do this so you need to do:
df.apply(lambda col:pd.to_numeric(col, errors='coerce'))
See the docs and this related question: pandas: to_numeric for multiple columns
convert_objects is deprecated.
For pandas >= 0.17.0, use pd.to_numeric
df["2nd"] = pd.to_numeric(df["2nd"])
With Python < 3 (e.g. 2.6 [see comments] or 2.7), there are two ways to do so.
# Option one
older_method_string = "%.9f" % numvar
# Option two
newer_method_string = "{:.9f}".format(numvar)
But note that for Python versions above 3 (e.g. 3.2 or 3.3), option two is preferred.
For more information on option two, I suggest this link on string formatting from the Python documentation.
And for more information on option one, this link will suffice and has info on the various flags.
Python 3.6 (officially released in December of 2016), added the f string literal, see more information here, which extends the str.format method (use of curly braces such that f"{numvar:.9f}" solves the original problem), that is,
# Option 3 (versions 3.6 and higher)
newest_method_string = f"{numvar:.9f}"
solves the problem. Check out @Or-Duan's answer for more info, but this method is fast.
Python 3.6
Just to make it clear, you can use f-string formatting. This has almost the same syntax as the format method, but make it a bit nicer.
Example:
print(f'{numvar:.9f}')
More reading about the new f string:
- What's new in Python 3.6 (same link as above)
- PEP official documentation
- Python official documentation
- Really good blog post - talks about performance too
Here is a diagram of the execution times of the various tested methods (from last link above):

Well, if you're reading the data in as a list, just do np.array(map(float, list_of_strings)) (or equivalently, use a list comprehension). (In Python 3, you'll need to call list on the map return value if you use map, since map returns an iterator now.)
However, if it's already a numpy array of strings, there's a better way. Use astype().
import numpy as np
x = np.array(['1.1', '2.2', '3.3'])
y = x.astype(np.float)
Another option might be numpy.asarray:
import numpy as np
a = ["1.1", "2.2", "3.2"]
b = np.asarray(a, dtype=float)
print(a, type(a), type(a[0]))
print(b, type(b), type(b[0]))
resulting in:
['1.1', '2.2', '3.2'] <class 'list'> <class 'str'>
[1.1 2.2 3.2] <class 'numpy.ndarray'> <class 'numpy.float64'>
>>> a = "545.2222"
>>> float(a)
545.22220000000004
>>> int(float(a))
545
Python2 method to check if a string is a float:
def is_float(value):
if value is None:
return False
try:
float(value)
return True
except:
return False
For the Python3 version of is_float see: Checking if a string can be converted to float in Python
A longer and more accurate name for this function could be: is_convertible_to_float(value)
What is, and is not a float in Python may surprise you:
The below unit tests were done using python2. Check it that Python3 has different behavior for what strings are convertable to float. One confounding difference is that any number of interior underscores are now allowed: (float("1_3.4") == float(13.4)) is True
val is_float(val) Note
-------------------- ---------- --------------------------------
"" False Blank string
"127" True Passed string
True True Pure sweet Truth
"True" False Vile contemptible lie
False True So false it becomes true
"123.456" True Decimal
" -127 " True Spaces trimmed
"\t\n12\r\n" True whitespace ignored
"NaN" True Not a number
"NaNanananaBATMAN" False I am Batman
"-iNF" True Negative infinity
"123.E4" True Exponential notation
".1" True mantissa only
"1_2_3.4" False Underscores not allowed
"12 34" False Spaces not allowed on interior
"1,234" False Commas gtfo
u'\x30' True Unicode is fine.
"NULL" False Null is not special
0x3fade True Hexadecimal
"6e7777777777777" True Shrunk to infinity
"1.797693e+308" True This is max value
"infinity" True Same as inf
"infinityandBEYOND" False Extra characters wreck it
"12.34.56" False Only one dot allowed
u'ๅ' False Japanese '4' is not a float.
"#56" False Pound sign
"56%" False Percent of what?
"0E0" True Exponential, move dot 0 places
0**0 True 0___0 Exponentiation
"-5e-5" True Raise to a negative number
"+1e1" True Plus is OK with exponent
"+1e1^5" False Fancy exponent not interpreted
"+1e1.3" False No decimals in exponent
"-+1" False Make up your mind
"(1)" False Parenthesis is bad
You think you know what numbers are? You are not so good as you think! Not big surprise.
Don't use this code on life-critical software!
Catching broad exceptions this way, killing canaries and gobbling the exception creates a tiny chance that a valid float as string will return false. The float(...) line of code can failed for any of a thousand reasons that have nothing to do with the contents of the string. But if you're writing life-critical software in a duck-typing prototype language like Python, then you've got much larger problems.