Congrats on passing the proposal! I agree with much of what has been said. I would only ever recommend Dedoose for collaborative projects. NVivo is better for individual projects. Like Methods-Geek, I have also switched to MAXQDA. The reason for that is that it is far superior to all the other programs for integrating both qualitative and quantitative logics of analysis. For instance, qualitative codes can be easily converted into quantitative document variables in MAXQDA, but it was almost impossible to do when I was using NVivo. Granted, that was a decade ago, but I have not regretted the switch. Answer from guywithabigknife on reddit.com
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/sociology › nvivo or dedoose?
r/sociology on Reddit: NVivo or Dedoose?
March 5, 2025 -

I just passed my dissertation proposal defense and my committee recommended I use one of these two qualitative data analysis software. What are the pros and cons of each?

If the scope of my project affects your answer, my data will include: 25 interviews of 1-2 hours each and content analysis of roughly 1000 pages of court documents. I will not be coding by keywords, but rather doing line-by-line coding using a thematic approach.

I am unlikely to need to collaborate much given it is an individual project.

Top answer
1 of 16
15
I use both, below are my impressions, hope it helps, cheers. Dedoose Pros: it is simpler, much easier to collaborate with (cloud based) and is payable on a monthly use basis, Cons : since it is browser based, can get slow and crash, also although you can easily modify your coding tree to create sub codes, in context, it is difficult to split a code, once the excerpt is coded you can relabel it as something else but not easily break it into smaller coded excerpts. I feel this lack of in-text flexibility could potentialy impact your analysis as it makes it harder to evolve from your initial, first cycle coding tree. Nvivo Pros: you can sub code excerpts (lump and detail) including from within -soon to be- parent code excerpts, or on the other hand merge codes (split and gather) at will. the software is computer based, no lagging, very rare crashing. Cons: it is expensive (easily worth 20 months of Dedoose subscription), the learning curve is longuer, it is difficult to collaborate with, but not impossible (you either need to coordinate coders to regularily export and then you gather and consolidate NVP files, or have access to Nvivo servers/ Nvivo for teams which is very expensive-in the thousands USD per year). in brief, it depends: the shorter the analysis timeframe, the more collaborative= Dedoose; the longuer the analysis timeframe, the less collaborative (i.e. PhD thesis)=Nvivo
2 of 16
5
Using NVivo for such a small dataset would be a bit like trying to crack a nut with a piledriver. Also it's not cheap. I'm not familiar with Dedoose, but I have heard very good things about Quirkos for small-study data analysis, so you might want to check that out too (apologies if I'm complicating rather than simplifying your life). Good luck!
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/phd › nvivo or dedoose?
r/PhD on Reddit: NVivo or Dedoose?
November 14, 2024 -

I just passed my dissertation proposal defense and my committee recommended I use one of these two qualitative data analysis software. What are the pros and cons of each?

If the scope of my project affects your answer, my data will include: 25 interviews of 1-2 hours each and content analysis of roughly 1000 pages of court documents. I will not be coding by keywords, but rather doing line-by-line coding using a thematic approach.

I am unlikely to need to collaborate much given it is an individual project.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/sociology › good alternatives to nvivo?
r/sociology on Reddit: Good alternatives to nVivo?
July 6, 2022 -

I've been using nVivo a few years and am tired of the difficulty in collaborating with co-authors and just the general lack of quality. Wondering, especially from people who have used nVivo, if you have found a better alternative. I am a Ph.D. student in social science and primarily want simple coding of interview transcripts. If anything can easily include social media then that's a bonus but not required. Thank you!

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/phd › i hate nvivo, i just hate it
r/PhD on Reddit: I hate NVIVO, I just hate it
September 1, 2022 -

I have no idea how can someone create such a program with this amount of bugs. it is really impressive and fascinating how they managed to make such horrible software with this many bugs and issues. ANYTHING I DO, ANYTHING makes it crash, from modifying the text to creating simple codes, it keeps loading forever and then crashes. I hate your software and you the developers should be ashamed of it.

FUCK YOU NVIVO

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/gradschool › which qda software do you use?
r/GradSchool on Reddit: Which QDA software do you use?
August 17, 2025 -

Hi there!

For context: I’m starting out a PhD in Law this year. In the context of my research, I’ll be taking a grounded theory approach to study a pretty large sample size of opinions written by Advocates General before the French Conseil d’Etat.

I’m currently looking for QDA software that I would be able to use for this type of research on legal materials.

My supervisor is on board with my approach but can’t really give any advice on the software to use seeing that it’s quite uncommon for legal researchers here to use data analysis software at all. I don’t want to go “analogue” because I expect to be managing anywhere from 300 to 500 opinions that can range anywhere between 15 and 50 pages each (based on similar research completed under my professor’s supervision).

My university doesn’t provide any particular software, so what do you all use for your qualitative data analysis? Are there any legal researchers here that have used QDAS in the past and successfully used it for our discipline? Are there any softwares that I should avoid?

Thanks Reddit ;)

Top answer
1 of 8
5
Okay qualitative researcher in a different field here. You’ve got a lot of options but some of it is going to depend on how much you/your advisor are willing to pay. Qualcoder is completely free but you get what you pay for to a point - it’s harder to collaborate and the user interface isn’t the best. Taguette is online and has a free tier but it’s super limited. The interface was “meh” at best. Dedoose seems to be popular but it’s basically browser only so no use while you’re on a plane with no Wi-Fi or anywhere else you’re offline. NVivo is one of the more full featured, expensive programs. It wasn’t super user friendly when I tried it so I abandoned it quickly even though there’s a copy of it on my desktop in the office. Does a lot, costs a lot. Also in the pricey bracket are programs like MaxQDA and Atlas.ti. Lots of features like NVivo. When you get to the level of MaxQDA, Nvivo, and Atlas.ti you’re to the point it’s like Windows vs Mac vs Linux - down to preferences, very specific features, and convenience. I would say to check out who has demos and free trials and see which ones you vibe with. See if any of the paid ones are worth the money and fit with your usual workflows. That way if you do wind up shelling out for something, it’s not something you wind up hating. I personally use QualCoder for interview studies and my literature review project with a couple thousand articles (and their associated PDFs) is actually being coded in excel. The former is because I hated NVivo and the latter is because I don’t have time to train my mentees on something more complicated.
2 of 8
4
I have just started out with this (in the context of a doctorate in education), but I tried out Dedoose, Nvivo and MAXQDA24 while working on a scoping review and I really strongly prefer MAXQDA. I find it to be the most intuitive of the three and the easiest to use. I also am liking the analysis tools the best - it has been pretty easy to figure out how to create all the various types of analysis visualizations and reports (tables, charts, etc.) that I can think of with the coding I've done, plus some I wouldn't have thought of on my own.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/research › qualitative coding softwares
r/research on Reddit: Qualitative Coding Softwares
March 19, 2025 -

Hey everyone! I’m a researcher working on a collaborative qualitative project with a team using both Mac and Windows, and we’re running into a ton of issues with NVivo 15. We’ve tried both the collaboration and normal cloud features, but we’re dealing with frequent crashes, codes shifting, and trouble seeing what other researchers have done.

This is a pretty large project—1-hour interviews with 15 to 30 participants—so having reliable software is crucial. Based on my research, NVivo seems to be the best option out there, but I’m curious—what do you all think? Are there better alternatives? What features would make a qualitative coding tool truly effective? Has anyone seen AI/LLM-powered platforms that help streamline the coding process? Would love to hear your thoughts!

Top answer
1 of 4
17
My prof made us use ChatGPT for small projects and AILYZE for large projects. ChatGPT’s good at suggesting key themes which you can use for coding. AILYZE is better for large projects. It was one of the tools recommended in our library’s assessment of AI research platforms ( https://guides.temple.edu/ai-research-tools/data ), and I’ve found it way more stable than NVivo. It does AI-generated themes, automatic coding, frequency/ cross segment analyses, etc. Might be worth checking out if NVivo is giving you headaches.
2 of 4
2
What makes NVivo the best is that it forces you to work manually. Meaning you will have to read the text and assign and group ideas together. Imagine reading the text on paper and marking your ideas in a pen here and there, it will be difficult to gather and recall all ideas, NVivo become important in simplifying this step. I always stick to Nvivo for those reason alone. AI tools will give ideas but I would not recommend it before reading your test yourself. I suggest you start and continue with Nvivo till the end (it is time consuming yes, but you will thank yourself at the end). The tree of codes will be there in the application, even if reviewers raised issues, it will take you seconds to navigate all the codes again. Further, choosing quotes in the text is easier when using Nvivo because you will be able to see the whole network and choose the most appropriate text accordingly. There are times when I used AI in suggesting the possible themes, I find myself reading the interview and already fixed (somehow) on the themes suggested by AI. So readking and initial codes first will give the benefit of possessing great knowledge of the content. Then AI suggestions can add your current knowledge, usually about naming and renaming, but you will find your coding way much in detail than AI. In addition to chatgpt, There is an AI tool in voyant-tool(dot)com It shows outcome from text, it shows the cloud and repeated words etc. All the best.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/dedoose › transporting coded dedoose interviews to nvivo or other platform due to cost increase?
r/Dedoose on Reddit: Transporting coded dedoose interviews to Nvivo or other platform due to cost increase?
March 29, 2023 -

Hi all,

Have any of you had experience transferring coded interviews from dedoose to other software like NVivo or Atlas.ti? I saw that they are increasing the cost of using Dedoose and I don't think I can afford it. I've also been a student this whole time and they never honor the student discount so I think I'm ready to switch elsewhere. Any tips?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r › AskAnthropology › comments › xf245r › best_software_to_learn
Reddit - The heart of the internet
December 22, 2021 - NVivo: for qualitative research · I have some questions about your recommendations pertaining to each and any of these. Which of these software do you think is the most user-friendly? Which of these software do you think best prepare you for work either in or outside of academia?
🌐
George Mason University
infoguides.gmu.edu › qual › software › choose
Choosing - QUALitative Research & Tools - InfoGuides at George Mason University
Dedoose - Designed for mixed methods projects with fewer but more complex codes (allows ratings), this full-featured online software is a solid choice in some circumstances, especially distributed groups with somewhat complex projects, or those ...
🌐
Usercall
usercall.co › post › dedoose-vs-nvivo-vs-usercall-which-qualitative-analysis-tool-is-best
Dedoose vs Nvivo vs Usercall: Which Qualitative Analysis Tool is Best?
Because it’s browser-based, you don’t need heavy installs or high-end machines to run it. ... Accessible from anywhere (no big software downloads). Great for distributed research teams. Cheaper entry price compared to NVivo.
🌐
Delve
delvetool.com › blog › dedoose-vs-nvivo-vs-delve
Dedoose vs. NVivo vs. Delve: What's The Best Qualitative Data Analysis Software? — Delve
January 14, 2025 - It can be a robust coding tool if you have enough time to learn the ins and outs of the software. ... NVivo, a QDA software renowned for handling especially large datasets, is favored by qualitative and mixed-methods researchers.
🌐
Usercall
usercall.co › post › top-5-qualitative-data-analysis-software-tools
Top 5 Qualitative Data Analysis Software Tools
Here’s a quick recap: Usercall - AI driven thematic analysis, modern, easy-to-use with deep customization options for high quality coding & insights. Dedoose – Affordable, cloud-based solution for geographically distributed teams.