The Daily Lobo
dailylobo.com › article › 2024 › 09 › opinion-logical-fallacies-in-the-presidential-debate
REVIEW: Logical fallacies in the presidential debate - The Daily Lobo
September 16, 2024 - On Tuesday, Sept. 10, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump met in person for the first presidential debate between the two candidates. During the debate, both Harris and Trump used more than a few logical fallacies — described in a philosophical context as “reasoning that comes to a conclusion without the evidence to support it,” according to Merriam-Webster.
What are some common logical fallacies you’ve seen people use, and how do you avoid them?
Strawmanning and whataboutisms seem to be a common theme across the board. Whataboutisms can be useful if you are trying to draw a parallels to hypocrisy between another person's claims but it is often used to divert attention onto a different topic entirely. More on reddit.com
In your opinion what are the 10 most common logical fallacies?
Can't believe nobody has mentioned relative privation yet, but I suppose their are more important problems in the world like starving kids in Africa. More on reddit.com
Help finding real life examples of logical fallacies?
My favourite is the 'Monty Python and the Holy Grail' witch trial scene , how many fallacies can you spot? More on reddit.com
How do logicians even use fallacies in debates and disputes? How do they even learn all of them?
They don’t. Fallacies are not part of formal logic. In my opinion, learning all of those as a debate tactic is kind of a waste of time. (I also think that debates are a waste of time, but that’s just me.) It is more effective to learn logic (propositional, predicate, modal, etc.) and understand the implication operator very deeply. When you have a solid foundation in these “approximations” to the logic of natural language, it becomes very easy for you to identify potential errors in reasoning. Oh, also you should learn some statistics and probability. Inductive reasoning is used all the time and it’s good to understand how it differs from deductive reasoning. More on reddit.com
Videos
Publicleadershipinstitute
publicleadershipinstitute.org › home › five logical fallacies often used in political and policy debate
Five logical fallacies often used in political and policy debate - Public leadership Institute
August 15, 2018 - EXAMPLE: The pro-abortion lobbyists oppose a waiting period and sonogram requirement because they favor abortion on demand. And abortion on demand means eliminating all consideration of the unborn child as well as women’s health. Your response should be: That is not the issue before this ...
Miami
ethics.miami.edu › _assets › pdf › um-ethics-society › logical_fallacies.pdf pdf
Logical Fallacies
that as evidence of God’s nonexistence would stand as equally fallacious.
Social Sci LibreTexts
socialsci.libretexts.org › bookshelves › communication studies › public speaking › advanced public speaking (meade) › 5: considerations for speech
5.3: Fallacies--Warning! Deceptive, Hateful Speech Coming Your Way - Social Sci LibreTexts
December 23, 2022 - The more heated a political argument becomes, the higher the likelihood that one side will mention Adolf Hitler. Whoever mentions Hitler first, loses the argument. Danile Elbaum · In fact, comparing someone to Hitler to invalidate their point is so popular it’s been given its own fake Latin name, the reductio ad Hitlerum – a play on the very real logic term reductio ad absurdum.
College of the Holy Cross
crossworks.holycross.edu › cgi › viewcontent.cgi pdf
College of the Holy Cross College of the Holy Cross CrossWorks CrossWorks
Logical fallacies are · fraudulent tricks people use in their argument to make it sound more credible while what they · really do is to fool the audience. Out of more than 300 kinds of fallacies, I focused on 18 · common ones by analyzing their use in debates about political issues. For example, Benjamin Shapiro gave a speech for pro-life and said that he donated
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC9389194
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians’ argumentative tweets—A coded dataset - PMC
The annotated data show different types of communicative relationships that political leaders developed with their audiences. The annotation of the types of argument and the fallacies characterizing an argumentative message is a growing need in several areas of research. First, in fields of logic and critical thinking, the analysis and the evaluation of arguments is taught at a theoretical level using textbook examples; however, the skills acquired by students or researchers on accurately selected or even invented cases are not sufficient for analyzing real messages.
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Analyzing Trump: 15 Logical Fallacies in 3 Minutes - YouTube
Check out TeachArgument.com for corresponding lessons plans and other awesome English teacher resources!Join the TeachArgument community to gain access to al...
Published March 6, 2016
Medium
medium.com › @Chiasma › 5-logical-fallacies-from-the-second-clinton-trump-debate-4080336314e1
5 Logical Fallacies from the Second Clinton Trump Debate | by Chiasma | Medium
October 15, 2016 - In this example, Donald Trump makes the point that by removing border laws on insurance companies, competition will result in the finest health care plan there is which is an oversimplification of a much more complex problem (different incomes, different pathologies, price of healthcare…). It is important to note that during the whole exchange on the topic, this was the only argument made. Therefore, rendering a possibly valid argument an oversimplification. The example also includes overstatements which are not a logical fallacy but a literary device often used in politics.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/askpolitics › what are some common logical fallacies you’ve seen people use, and how do you avoid them?
r/Askpolitics on Reddit: What are some common logical fallacies you’ve seen people use, and how do you avoid them?
December 12, 2024 -
This isn’t really politics but it’s used in it so good enough
So I want to get better at arguing. Part of arguing is realizing that you’re making bs up and that you should reevaluate your stance. aka realize that you are using a fallacy. So, what are the most common fallacies you’ve seen and how do you avoid them?
(Please reply with an actual fallacy not just people being stupid)
Top answer 1 of 18
14
Strawmanning and whataboutisms seem to be a common theme across the board. Whataboutisms can be useful if you are trying to draw a parallels to hypocrisy between another person's claims but it is often used to divert attention onto a different topic entirely.
2 of 18
12
one of the biggest fallacies I see now, especially in political arguments is that consensus equals science. If that were true the world would still be flat.
College of the Holy Cross
crossworks.holycross.edu › mellon_summer_research › 5
"The Logical Fallacies in Political Discourse" by Zilin Cidre Zhou
I examined the use of logical fallacies in political discourse. Logical fallacies are fraudulent tricks people use in their argument to make it sound more credible while what they really do is to fool the audience. Out of more than 300 kinds of fallacies, I focused on 18 common ones by analyzing ...
Philosophymt
philosophymt.com › a-trumpian-overture-of-logical-fallacies
The logical fallacies of Donald Trump (with video) – PhilosophyMT
October 14, 2020 - The excerpt below shows how Trump uses logical fallacies to grip his audience. I chose this particular speech arbitrarily. It happened to be the most recent one given by President Trump, whom I also, somehow, chose arbitrarily.
Simple Book Publishing
uark.pressbooks.pub › speaking › chapter › fallacies
Fallacies–Warning! Deceptive, Hateful Speech Coming Your Way – Advanced Public Speaking
August 14, 2021 - The more heated a political argument becomes, the higher the likelihood that one side will mention Adolf Hitler. Whoever mentions Hitler first, loses the argument. Danile Elbaum · In fact, comparing someone to Hitler to invalidate their point is so popular it’s been given its own fake Latin name, the reductio ad Hitlerum – a play on the very real logic term reductio ad absurdum.