My math teacher in school defined exponentiation as repeated multiplication. The problem with this definition is that it is not inclusive. It makes no sense when the exponent is not a positive integer.
Now my questions are:
Are a0=1 and a-b = 1/ab definition statements? By definition statements, I mean statements similar to axioms. If they’re not definitions, what is the proof for each?
How is an irrational exponent calculated (e.g. epi)?
What is the inclusive and general definition of exponentiation and multiplication? (Yes. I am having the exact same problem with multiplication (and division actually). The “repeated addition” does not work.
Why is it that I can only add and subtract two numbers when they have the same unit but can divide and multiply numbers with different units? Can I can exponentiate numbers with different units too? What does this tell about multiplication and division?
Videos
My chief understanding of the exponential and the logarithm come from Spivak's wonderful book Calculus. He devotes a chapter to the definitions of both.
Think of exponentiation as some abstract operation 
(
is just some index, but you'll see why it's there) that takes a natural number 
and spits out a new number 
. You should think of 
.
To match our usual notion of exponentiation, we want it to satisfy a few rules, most importantly 
. Like how 
.
Now, we can extend this operation to the negative integers using this rule: take 
to be 
. then 
, like how 
.
Then we can extend the operation to the rational numbers, by taking 
. Like how 
.
Now, from here we can look to extend 
to the real numbers. This takes more work than what's happened up to now. The idea is that we want 
to satisfy the basic property of exponentiation: 
. This way we know it agrees with usual exponentiation for natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers. But there are a million ways to extend 
while preserving this property, so how do we choose?
Answer: Require 
to be continuous.
This way, we also have a way to evaluate 
for any real number 
: take a sequence of rational numbers 
converging to 
, then 
is 
. This seems like a pretty reasonable property to require!
Now, actually constructing a function that does this is hard. It turns out it's easier to define its inverse function, the logarithm 
, which is the area under the curve 
from 
to 
for 
. Once you've defined the logarithm, you can define its inverse 
. You can then prove that it has all the properties of the exponential that we wanted, namely continuity and 
. From here you can change the base of the exponential: 
.
To conclude: the real exponential function 
is defined (in fact uniquely) to be a continuous function 
satisfying the identity 
for all real 
and 
. One way to interpret it for real numbers is as a limit of exponentiating by rational approximations. Its inverse, the logarithm, can similarly be justified.
Finally, de Moivre's formula 
is what happens when you take the Taylor series expansion of 
and formally use it as its definition in the complex plane. This is more removed from intuition; it's really a bit of formal mathematical symbol-pushing.
or
(or any other irrational power, really). What does this mean?
$$a^\pi=a^{3.1415\ldots}=a^{3\ +\ 0.1\ +\ 0.04\ +\ 0.001\ +\ 0.0005\ +\ \cdots}=a^3\cdot a^{0.1}\cdot a^{0.04}\cdot a^{0.001}\cdot a^{0.0005}\cdots
a^\sqrt2=a^{1.4142\ldots}=a^{1\ +\ 0.4\ +\ 0.01\ +\ 0.004\ +\ 0.0002\ +\ \cdots}=a^1\cdot a^{0.4}\cdot a^{0.01}\cdot a^{0.004}\cdot a^{0.0002}\cdots$$
It is obvious that the general factor of this infinite product tends towards 
. Convergence then follows from the fact that each single decimal digit is in between 
and 
, meaning that 
is in between 
, and 
, where 
is the number of digits of 
.
EDIT: I know b^a = e^(aln(b)), however, this uses exponentiation to define exponentiation.
So in school we're taught that exponentiation is repeated multiplication. However, this definition quickly falls apart when you have something like 2^pi. Afterall, what does it even mean to multiply 2 by itself pi times?
That definition gets even more wonky when you have things like (-2)^pi which isn't a real number.
What is the mathematical definition of exponentiation a^b that applies to all fields (real and complex) for ANY a or b?