Ah ah! Checkout the previous commit, then checkout the master.
git checkout HEAD^
git checkout -f master
Top answer 1 of 3
376
Ah ah! Checkout the previous commit, then checkout the master.
git checkout HEAD^
git checkout -f master
2 of 3
23
As others have pointed out one could just delete all the files in the repo and then check them out. I prefer this method and it can be done with the code below
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 rm
git checkout -- .
or one line
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 rm ; git checkout -- .
I use it all the time and haven't found any down sides yet!
For some further explanation, the -z appends a null character onto the end of each entry output by ls-files, and the -0 tells xargs to delimit the output it was receiving by those null characters.
Graphite
graphite.com › guides › git-force-checkout
Git force checkout
To force checkout a branch, effectively ... you can use: ... This command will switch to the specified branch and reset the working directory to the last commit's state, disregarding any changes to tracked files....
Why does doing 'force checkout' to some previous commit destroy the file that isn't commited?
Instead we do git checkout -f 398d and all the changes get destroyed. Why it makes sense? Because that's exactly what is meant by "force", and what the -f flag does. Wouldn't it make more sense if instead we keep the uncommited text in case I switch to master branch again? If that's what you want, then you should just do git checkout 398d without the -f. It sounds like you just want -f to not exist... Why? What would the point of that be? Just don't use it if you don't want it. More on reddit.com
5
4
March 31, 2022Correct way of checkout and build from a branch
My team use a simple model with Git. Master branch is the latest development and is considered as unstable. For RC (ReleaseCandidate) we make a new branch for every release and use the version as branchname. Like “2018.09”. So the buildscript checkout and build master every morning. More on finalbuilder.com
3
0
September 12, 2018How do I overwrite one branch with another branch?
Why not... make a new branch? More on reddit.com
23
42
May 20, 2019How to keep changes if I wanna checkout to another branch but I don't wanna commit them yet?
When you get back to the branch where you did git stash do git stash pop to get your changes back. More on reddit.com
14
5
May 30, 202202:37
How Do I Force A Git Checkout? - Next LVL Programming - YouTube
04:01
More Than Switching Branches | git checkout Does Everything - YouTube
05:44
git training | Chapter 20: git checkout - YouTube
00:51
Git: Use this command line trick to quickly switch branches - YouTube
04:12
Git checkout | Switch branches or restore working tree files | ...
Git
git-scm.com › docs › git-checkout
Git - git-checkout Documentation
When you run git checkout <something>, ... files. If there’s any ambiguity, Git will treat <something> as a branch or commit, but you can use the double dash -- to force ......
Reddit
reddit.com › r/git › why does doing 'force checkout' to some previous commit destroy the file that isn't commited?
r/git on Reddit: Why does doing 'force checkout' to some previous commit destroy the file that isn't commited?
March 31, 2022 -
Let's say we have a text file with some text: boo. We commit that change and say it has a hash 398d. Now we make changes to that text and add 'foo' but we don't commit it yet. Instead we do git checkout -f 398d and all the changes get destroyed. Why it makes sense? Wouldn't it make more sense if instead we keep the uncommited text in case I switch to master branch again?
Top answer 1 of 4
19
Instead we do git checkout -f 398d and all the changes get destroyed. Why it makes sense? Because that's exactly what is meant by "force", and what the -f flag does. Wouldn't it make more sense if instead we keep the uncommited text in case I switch to master branch again? If that's what you want, then you should just do git checkout 398d without the -f. It sounds like you just want -f to not exist... Why? What would the point of that be? Just don't use it if you don't want it.
2 of 4
7
Force checkout is meant to forcefully switch state, which includes clobbering/discarding any changes. It's sort of like when you force push and it clobbers changes to the remote. The tool is working as designed in the scenario you describe. If you're wanting to keep uncommitted changes around without necessarily committing, consider git stash. This is the canonical way to temporarily save uncommitted changes for later, e.g. "I was on my feature branch, made a bugfix, then realized that I needed that bugfix in main/master instead". Unless I'm trying to diagnose a particularly tricky regression (using git bisect or the like) or I'm wanting to. compare behaviors between some state in the past and now, I, as a rule, will not check out previous commits. I certainly can, but it's harder to keep myself out of trouble, especially if I'm collaborating with others. I had a colleague once who was in the habit of checking out past commits, then making changes, then adding the changes to those commits. It was absolutely maddening to diagnose the wacky-ass errors he introduced into the codebase this way. My preference is always to treat past commits as immutable and sacred. So they were written, so they shall be, for ever and ever. If I need to make changes, I do so from the latest head of my current un-merged branch.
GeeksforGeeks
geeksforgeeks.org › git › how-to-force-checkout-in-git
How to Force Checkout in Git? - GeeksforGeeks
May 29, 2024 - The --ours and --theirs options help you resolve conflicts by favouring your changes or the changes from the branch you are merging, respectively. git checkout --ours <file-path> git checkout --theirs <file-path>
freeCodeCamp
freecodecamp.org › news › git-checkout-explained
Git Checkout Explained: How to Checkout, Change, or Switch a Branch in Git
December 31, 2019 - git checkout -f BRANCH-NAME # Alternative git checkout --force BRANCH-NAME
Alpha Efficiency.™
alphaefficiency.com › git-force-checkout
How to Force Git Checkout | Alpha Efficiency.™
Using force checkout guarantees that the working directory corresponds to the target entity without any remnants of old work that could cause issues or errors in the future. If the version control system doesn’t allow you to check out a branch for whatever reason, you can still indicate Git to force checkout and switch branches.
Published April 28, 2022
Brandon Pugh's Blog
brandonpugh.com › til: today i learned... › git branch --force
Git branch --force | Brandon Pugh's Blog
August 16, 2023 - For example, if I forgot to create a new feature branch and accidentally made some commits onto main, I can run the following: git checkout -b new-branch # create the new branch and switch to it git branch --force main origin/main # fix main ...
GitKraken
gitkraken.com › home › learn › git checkout
Git Checkout - Checkout Branches, Commits, & Tags | Learn Git
March 26, 2026 - If you want to make changes to a branch that you don’t already have checked out, you will first need to checkout the branch. GiTip: Learn how to Git checkout a remote branch and how to switch between local branches.
Atlassian
jira.atlassian.com › browse › SRCTREEWIN-441
As a user, I want to force checkout a remote branch and ...
git -c diff.mnemonicprefix=false -c core.quotepath=false checkout -b develop --track origin/develop fatal: A branch named 'develop' already exists. With a force option, the Git command would be: git.exe checkout -f -B develop remotes/origin/develop · Assignee: Steve Streeting (Inactive) Reporter: ...
LinkedIn
linkedin.com › pulse › git-checkout-f-reset-hard-commend-musaddek-ali
The "git checkout -f" and "git reset --hard" commend for Git.
May 4, 2023 - The git checkout -f command in Git is used to force switch to a different branch or commit and discard any local changes or uncommitted modifications made to the current branch. The -f option stands for "force" and is used to override Git's ...
Medium
medium.com › @ucheokorojefferson › understanding-git-commands-such-as-git-checkout-git-checkout-force-git-stash-git-commit-and-git-e446c8ab3a61
Understanding Git commands such as git checkout, git checkout force, git stash, git commit, and git checkout -b. | by Jefferson Uche-Okoro | Medium
February 4, 2024 - — Example: `git checkout -f branch-name` would forcibly switch to the specified branch, losing any unsaved changes. — Differences: Unlike regular `git checkout`, `git checkout force` does not prompt for confirmation before discarding changes.
Finalbuilder
finalbuilder.com › discussion
Correct way of checkout and build from a branch - VSoft Technologies Forums
September 12, 2018 - My team use a simple model with Git. Master branch is the latest development and is considered as unstable. For RC (ReleaseCandidate) we make a new branch for every release and use the version as branchname. Like “2018.09”. So the buildscript checkout and build master every morning.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/git › how do i overwrite one branch with another branch?
r/git on Reddit: How do I overwrite one branch with another branch?
May 20, 2019 - Checkout master, pull the updates from the upstream repository. Then checkout your branch, and either: rebase your branch onto master, or merge master into your branch. ... Branches are merely pointers to commits.
GitHub
gist.github.com › marcuswestin › b44af9f71f85365959b2
Git checkout --force (checkout, or create if it doesn't exist) · GitHub
Git checkout --force (checkout, or create if it doesn't exist) - git-checkout-force.sh
RTEE Tech
blog.rteetech.com › home › development › git force checkout: safely switch branches & discard changes
Git Force Checkout: Safely Switch Branches & Discard Changes
June 5, 2025 - If uncommitted changes in your current branch conflict with a new branch you wish to switch to Git prevents the action to avoid data loss. Using the `-f` flag resolves this issue by disregarding local changes. When you need to discard modifications in a specific file and want it to match the committed version from the repository, `git force checkout` does the trick.
GitKraken
gitkraken.com › home › learn › problems & solutions › how do you checkout a remote branch in git?
How do you checkout a remote Git branch? | Solutions to Git Problems
August 5, 2022 - To checkout a remote Git branch you will follow a similar process for switching between local branches. You will use the git checkout command followed by the branch...
Git
git-scm.com › docs › git-switch › 2.44.0
Git - git-switch Documentation
$ git switch --detach HEAD~3 HEAD is now at 9fc9555312 Merge branch 'cc/shared-index-permbits' If it turns out whatever you have done is worth keeping, you can always create a new name for it (without switching away): ... Everything below this line in this section is selectively included from the git-config[1] documentation. The content is the same as what’s found there: ... When you run git checkout <something> or git switch <something> and only have one remote, it may implicitly fall back on checking out and tracking e.g.
Better Stack
betterstack.com › community › questions › how-to-replace-local-branch-with-remote-branch-entirely
How to Replace Local Branch With Remote Branch Entirely in Git? | Better Stack Community
Warning: Be cautious with force-pushing as it can overwrite changes on the remote branch and affect other collaborators. Fetch Latest Changes: Copied! git fetch origin · Check Out Local Branch: Copied! git checkout <local-branch> Reset Local ...
Isomorphic-git
isomorphic-git.org › docs › en › checkout.html
checkout · isomorphic-git
// switch to the main branch await git.checkout({ fs, dir: '/tutorial', ref: 'main' }) console.log('done') // restore the 'docs' and 'src/docs' folders to the way they were, overwriting any changes await git.checkout({ fs, dir: '/tutorial', force: true, filepaths: ['docs', 'src/docs'] }) console.log('done') // restore the 'docs' and 'src/docs' folders to the way they are in the 'develop' branch, overwriting any changes await git.checkout({ fs, dir: '/tutorial', ref: 'develop', noUpdateHead: true, force: true, filepaths: ['docs', 'src/docs'] }) console.log('done') Tip: If you need a clean slate, expand and run this snippet to clean up the file system.