Does anyone know the Google Antigravity usage limits for each model (Gemini 3 Pro High/Low, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking, Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking, GPT‑OSS 120B Medium)?

On the official page one.google.com/ai it only lists credits for Google AI Plus (200 monthly credits), Google AI Pro (1,000 monthly credits), and Google AI Ultra (25,000 monthly credits) — but those are for Flow and Whisk.

👉 What about Antigravity credits/limits per day, week, month on each plan (Free, Plus, Pro, Ultra)?
Is there any official documentation or even rumors / user practice reports about how Antigravity enforces quotas across these models?

Would love to hear from anyone who has tested this in practice.

If you use Antigravity, you've probably heard about Google increasing the quotas.

They didn't - you can just use more of the same quota at once, and you then wait a week to renew it.

Here is the screenshot. I am an Ultra user. Antigravity Version: 1.11.14. I hit this limit in a day worth of usage.

What's worse is after I switched to a free account the next day, I got practically the same amount of usage out of it. Like it's almost not noticeable that Ultra has more quota than free tier.

I open up google antigravity to try and get some help on a project, and notice a popup saying that rate limits will be changing to weekly to "Allow for longer periods of interaction" Will this negatively effect the experience , like how much larger is the rate limit in comparison to before?

What's your experience with the Google AI pro plan? Thx

I’ve been hitting walls with the new Google Antigravity IDE, so I dug into the terms to see what was going on. What I found is actually pretty insulting to those of us paying for the ecosystem.

The Reality: Antigravity is officially a "No-cost public preview."

• The Limit: Quota refreshes every 5 hours (and it's tight).

• The Kicker: It completely ignores your subscription tier.

If you are paying for Gemini Pro/Ultra thinking you’ll get priority access or higher caps, you don't. You are thrown into the exact same bucket as a free user.

I get that it's a "preview," but why am I paying a premium subscription if I'm still treated like a free tier user on their newest products? It feels like they have zero consideration for early adopters who are actually funding the product.

Source: https://antigravity.google/docs/plans

Hi everyone,

I'm running into a frustrating issue with the new Antigravity IDE limits and wanted to ask if anyone has found a workaround.

The Situation: I have an active "Google AI Pro" (2 TB) subscription, which includes Gemini Advanced. According to the pricing page, this should put me on the "Developer plan" with rate limits refreshing every 5 hours.

The Problem: My Antigravity editor still insists I am on the "Free Plan" with the new weekly limits (which I have already hit).

What I've tried so far:

• Logged out and back in multiple times in the IDE.

• Verified that the email in the IDE matches my subscription email.

• Checked my Google One account (subscription is definitely active).

It seems like the IDE isn't syncing the subscription status correctly. Has anyone else with Gemini Advanced faced this? Is there a specific way to force a status refresh?

Thanks in advance!

Hey everyone! 👋

I've been lurking in both r/google_antigravity and r/GoogleAntigravityIDE since launch, and I spent the past few days analyzing the most common questions, complaints, and success stories. Here's what I found:

## **Top 5 Pain Points:**

**1. Quota Confusion (mentioned in 50+ posts)**

- Free users: 168-hour reset

- Paid users (AI Pro/Ultra): 5-hour reset

- Gemini and Vertex AI quotas are SEPARATE

- Timer doesn't start until you use that model again

**2. Performance Issues**

- Each workspace spawns its own language server (~300-500MB RAM each)

- 12 open conversations = 7.3GB RAM + 91% CPU (from the forensic analysis post)

- Solution: Close unused workspaces, limit to 2-3 active conversations

- MacOS users: Check the GPU acceleration fix pinned in the sub

**3. Safety Concerns After the D: Drive Incident**

- Google added "Secure Mode" (commands require approval)

- Set up GEMINI.md with safety rules

- File system access now restricted to workspace only

- Always work in agent-assisted mode as a beginner

**4. Model Selection**

- Claude Opus 4.5: Best for complex logic, but can timeout

- Gemini 3 Pro: Balanced, good for general development

- Gemini 3 Flash: Fast, now with higher limits

- Use planning mode for better results

**5. "It Keeps Deleting My Code!"**

- Review the implementation plan BEFORE accepting

- Use Google Docs-style comments on artifacts

- Enable "Review-driven development" mode in settings

## **Success Patterns from Top Posts:**

✅ Users building complete apps in 1 week that would take months manually

✅ 30 hours of work replacing 3 months of coding (from the Opus 4.5 appreciation post)

✅ Projects: Resutex (resume builder), JobSaathi (job application tool), EdTech apps

## **Quick Wins:**

- **Create custom rules**: Add /rules/typescript.md, /rules/security.md, etc.

- **Use artifacts effectively**: Review implementation plans, not just raw code

- **Hardware matters**: 32GB RAM recommended for serious use, 16GB minimum

- **Leverage browser agent**: Great for UI iteration and testing

## **Resources I Wish I Had When Starting:**

Since this info is scattered across Reddit, YouTube, and docs, I started collecting everything in one place at **antigravityai.directory** (not affiliated with Google, just a community resource).

It has:

- Curated tutorials by skill level

- Performance optimization guides

- Safety setup templates

- MCP server configs (Laravel, Redis, Shopify)

- Hardware requirement calculators

- Links to active discussions

Feel free to submit your own resources if you've created tutorials or tools!

## **What I'm Still Figuring Out:**

- Best practices for multi-agent workflows

- Optimal aiChangeLog/ structure for team projects

- When to use turbo vs planning mode

What are your biggest Antigravity pain points? Drop them below and let's crowdsource solutions! 🚀

I’m quite excited, so download the app and run it on an old Next.js project. The agent goes fully autonomous with a single prompt for minutes, so I grab my double cappuccino. By the time I came back, the limit was already hit.

Prompt: Understand the codebase and build the code.

Call 1-5: List files / read. Call 6-96: Install dependencies, generate Prisma client, build Next.js app, verify API routes, fix routes, fix lint.

22 files changed.

Model quota limit exceeded.

Has anyone here used Google's Antigravity IDE yet?

I recently tested it out for a web stack project—the interface is very VS Code-like, and the AI (Gemini 3) squashed some long-standing bugs for me and even helped refactor a dormant project back to life. The whole multi-agent setup (where you can spawn coding, review, and refactor agents) is wild for streamlining bigger repos.

Curious:

- Do you find it just a polished VS Code clone with better AI, or does it offer something truly unique?

- Anyone pushed the agentic features in real-world workflows?

- Have you tried Chrome integration or in-IDE API testing?

- How does it stack up to Cursor and other AI IDEs?

Would love actual dev feedback—especially from those who've tried it on mid-to-large codebases.

If so thats a smack in the face to Pro and Ultra subscribers... Who are probably the ones using Anti Gravity in the first place

It’s not better than Cursor, but it’s definitely on the same level already. The crazy part? They reached this point in such a short time.

What stood out to me the most:

• Speed → It’s unbelievably fast. Feels almost instant.

• Execution style → Unlike Cursor’s big monolithic actions, Anti-Gravity breaks things into small multi-step operations, completes them quickly, and keeps iterating.

• Product maturity → For something this new, they’ve already matched a surprising number of Cursor-like features.

• User experience → The way it thinks, resolves, and implements changes feels super fluid.

If this is Day 1, then the competition in AI coding tools is going to get very interesting.

Edit — the above text itself was generated by Anti-Gravity. I used up my quota completely, and now it’s rate-limited.

What are the limits for the Google AI Pro with Antigravity?
They say higher rate limits, but I want to know if there's a rough estimate for the number of prompts/tokens I can use within the 5 hrs limit.

I want to move from the cursor, but I want to make sure it's worth the move.

This can't be for real right? I have the AI Ultra sub and already reached the limit for the day within 2 hours of vibe coding?

Hey, usually i don't really use VS Code Forks in any way but wanted to try out Google's AntiGravity and found out there is no way to check your quota right now. Therefore i created a small VSX Plugin to make it easily viewable via the modal or in the status bar (image on github).
You can find the plugin here: https://github.com/Henrik-3/AntigravityQuota or directly in AntiGravity via the extensions tab by searching for Antigravity Quota (AGQ)

For questions or ideas feel free to reach out

Has anyone here used Google's Antigravity IDE yet?

I recently tested it out for a web stack project—the interface is very VS Code-like, and the AI (Gemini 3) squashed some long-standing bugs for me and even helped refactor a dormant project back to life. The whole multi-agent setup (where you can spawn coding, review, and refactor agents) is wild for streamlining bigger repos.

Curious:

- Do you find it just a polished VS Code clone with better AI, or does it offer something truly unique?

- Anyone pushed the agentic features in real-world workflows?

- Have you tried Chrome integration or in-IDE API testing?

- How does it stack up to Cursor and other AI IDEs?

Would love actual dev feedback—especially from those who've tried it on mid-to-large codebases.

Google just announced new AI First IDE - Google Antigravity. Looks like another VS Code Fork to me.

Good thing is its free for now with Gemini Pro 3.0

Google has been rolling out a bunch of newer AI models this week.
Along with Gemini 3 Pro, which is now the world’s most advanced LLM, and Nano Banana 2, Google has released their own IDE.

This IDE ships with agentic AI features, powered by Gemini 3.

It's supposed to be a competitor with Cursor, and one of the big things about it is that it's free, although with no data privacy.

There was a lot of buzz around it, so I decided to give it a try.

Downloading

I first headed over to https://antigravity.google/download, and over there found something very interesting:

There's an exe available for Windows, a dmg for macOS, but on Linux I had to download and install it via the CLI.

While there's a lot of software out there that does that, and it kinda makes sense; it's mostly geeks who are using Linux, but here it feels a bit weird.
We're literally talking about an IDE, for devs, you can expect users on all platforms to be somewhat familiar with the terminal.

First-Time Setup

As part of the first-time setup, I had to sign in to my Google account, and this is where I ran into the first problem. It wouldn't get past signing in.

It turned out this was a bug on Google's end, and after waiting a bit until Google's devs sorted it out, I was able to sign in.

I was now able to give it a spin.

First Impressions

Antigravity turned out to be very familiar, it's basically VS Code with Google's Agent instead of Github Copilot, and a bit more of a modern UI.

Time to give Agent a try.

Problems

Workspaces

Problem number two: Agent kept insisting I need to setup a workspace, and that it can't do anything for me until I do that. This was pretty confusing, as in VS Code as soon as I open a folder, that becomes the active workspace, and I assumed that it would work the same way in Antigravity.

I'm still not sure if things work differently in Antigravity, or this is a bug in Agent.

After some back and forth with Agent, trying to figure out this workspace problem, I hit the next problem.

Rate-Limits

I had reached my rate limit for Gemini 3, even though I have a paid subscription for Gemini. After doing a little research, it turns out that I'm not the only one with this issue, many people are complaining that Agent has very low limits, even if you pay for Gemini, making it completely unusable.

Extensions

I tried installing the extensions I have in VS Code, and here I found Antigravity's next limitation. The IDE is basically identical to VS Code, so I assumed I would have access to all of the same extensions.

It turns out that Visual Studio Marketplace, where I had been downloading my extensions from in VS Code, is only available in VS Code itself, and not for any other forks. On other VS Code-based IDEs, extensions can be installed from Open VSX, which only has about 3,000 extensions, instead of Visual Studio Marketplace's 50k+ extensions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Google's new agentic IDE sounded promising, it's buggy and too limited to actually use, and I'm sticking with VS Code.

BTW, feel free to check out my profile site.