Medium
medium.com › data-science-in-your-pocket › cursor-vs-google-antigravity-best-ai-ide-for-vibe-coders-f3ecbd02f161
Cursor vs Google AntiGravity : Best AI IDE for Vibe Coders? | by Mehul Gupta | Data Science in Your Pocket | Nov, 2025 | Medium
1 month ago - AI is there to unblock you, not replace your control loop. Cursor is for craft + velocity. You care less about code elegance and more about seeing ideas breathe quickly. You jump between 5 unfinished SaaS concepts per month.
Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which AI-Agent Editor Is Best for You?
November 21, 2025 - Its Agent Manager view, artifact generation, and browser recording make it far more than just an AI-powered editor. If you prefer speed, parallelism, and a VS-Code–like experience, Cursor 2.0 is likely a better fit.
Videos
Should I use Cursor, Antigravity, or both?
Use Cursor if you need a robust professional editor. Use Antigravity if you're budget-conscious or experimenting. Use both if you want multiple AI perspectives and maximum flexibility.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
How much will I actually use AI coding tools?
Most developers use AI for about 30–40% of their coding work. Simple functions, complex logic, and high-level decision-making still require human thinking. AI shines best on medium-complexity, tedious tasks.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
What is the real value of AI coding tools?
The real benefits come from reduced context switching, fewer syntax errors, improved clarity through explanation, and faster refactoring. They don’t replace developers but significantly reduce friction in workflows.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity
Did Google Just Kill Cursor with Antigravity?
November 19, 2025 - Google launches Antigravity, a revolutionary AI-first IDE powered by Gemini 3 that outperforms Cursor in code generation, context awareness, and API integration. Developers now question if Cursor's dominance ends here.
CometAPI
cometapi.com › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-2-0
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which IDE should you choose in 2025? - CometAPI - All AI Models in One API
4 weeks ago - Cursor emphasizes safe collaboration between humans and agents. Both platforms explicitly design to be integrated: Cursor emphasizes Git provider integrations and editor-level code review features that slot directly into developer pipelines.
Metana
metana.io › metana | career-focused coding bootcamp › metana | career-focused coding bootcamp › ai & machine learning › ai & machine learning › google antigravity vs cursor: ai-powered coding ides differences › ai automation › google antigravity vs cursor: ai-powered coding ides differences
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: AI-Powered Coding IDEs Differences
1 month ago - Antigravity leans into agent first automation with a central control system, while Cursor delivers fast, developer guided multi agent workflows. This comparison breaks down their differences in autonomy, speed, safety, and practical use to
Reddit
reddit.com › r/cursor › cursor vs. google antigravity
r/cursor on Reddit: Cursor vs. Google Antigravity
1 week ago -
So I stumbled upon Google’s Antigravity IDE this morning. Their developer plan is a lot more generous than how Cursor prices its plans. The developer plan has higher rate limits that refresh every five hours, as opposed to Cursor, which makes you wait an entire billing cycle for the rate limit to reset, or charges you extra if you don’t want to wait.
Has anyone tried Antigravity by Google yet? If so, what are your impressions? Is it worth switching?
This is directed at Cursor....if you’re reading this, you need to restructure your plans so users aren’t rate-limited early or charged excessively after using Opus 4.5. You’ve got competition now.
Top answer 1 of 5
70
google can afford to give things out for free because they train on your data, they're a trillion dollar company, cursor is not, they can't give things for free
2 of 5
31
I started using Antigravity. I have a Google pro plan for free (new Samsung phone promotion), so I get very generous limits. I usually get a full day work in Opus before I reach the limit. It's still pretty buggy, but I feel like a little bit more polishing and it will replace cursor completely.
Humai
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
4 weeks ago - According to Google's announcement, it achieves 76.2% on the SWE-bench coding benchmark, which puts it in the elite tier of AI coding performance. The pitch is simple: why pay $20/month for Cursor when you can get comparable (or better) performance for free, with your choice of multiple frontier AI models? ... This surprised me. I expected the multi-model thing to be a gimmick, but it's actually one of Antigravity's killer features.
Skywork
skywork.ai › home › antigravity vs cursor: which ai coding tool is better?
Antigravity vs Cursor: Which AI Coding Tool Is Better? - Skywork ai
2 weeks ago - Antigravity: Planned endpoints, wired middleware, wrote basic tests. Crucially, it missed a rate-limit check and assumed a logger I don’t use. 30 min to first PR, 12 min cleanup. Cursor: Composer scaffold + targeted chat for tests. Slower to first pass (38 min) but zero broken imports and cleaner test structure, minimizing post-AI cleanup time.
Stackademic
blog.stackademic.com › i-compared-google-antigravity-against-cursor-ai-across-real-engineering-workflows-0eb4a2abba9e
I Compared Google Antigravity Against Cursor AI Across Real ...
November 23, 2025 - I Compared Google Antigravity Against Cursor AI Across Real Engineering Workflows…. A lived-in comparison of Antigravity vs Cursor AI covering speed, accuracy, security, data residency, and large-repo performance..
DevelopmentCorporate
developmentcorporate.com › home › google antigravity vs. cursor: why technical superiority won’t win this agentic development platform war
Google Antigravity vs. Cursor: Why Technical Superiority Won't Win This Agentic Development Platform War - Development Corporate
November 23, 2025 - Antigravity feels like a research preview that escaped the lab, not a commercial product ready for enterprise adoption. Here’s what technical comparisons miss entirely: Cursor has already won the network effects game.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptcoding › i tried google's new antigravity ide so you don't have to (vs cursor/windsurf)
r/ChatGPTCoding on Reddit: I tried Google's new Antigravity IDE so you don't have to (vs Cursor/Windsurf)
November 21, 2025 -
Google just dropped "Antigravity" (antigravity.google) and claims it's an "Agent-First" IDE. I've been using Cursor heavily for the past few months, so I decided to give this a spin to see if it's just hype or a real competitor.
My key takeaways after testing it:
The "Agent Manager" is the real deal: Unlike the linear chat in VS Code/Cursor, here you can spawn multiple agent threads. I managed to have one agent refactoring a messy LegacyUserProfile.js component while another agent was writing Jest tests for it simultaneously. It feels more like orchestration than coding.
Model Access: It currently offers Gemini 3 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet for free during the preview. That alone makes it worth the download.
Installation: It's a VS Code fork, so migration (extensions, keybindings) took about 30 seconds.
The "Vibe Coding" Trap: I noticed that because it's so powerful, it's easy to get lazy. I did a test run generating a Frontend component from a screenshot.
Attempt 1 (Lazy prompt): The code worked but the CSS was messy.
Attempt 2 (Senior prompt): I explicitly asked for BEM methodology and semantic HTML. The result was production-ready.
Conclusion: It might not kill Cursor today, but the multi-agent workflow is definitely superior for complex tasks.
I made a full video breakdown showing the installation and the 3-agent demo in action if you want to see the UI: https://youtu.be/M06VEfzFHZY?si=W_3OVIzrSJY4IXBv
Has anyone else tried the multi-agent feature yet? How does it compare to Windsurf's flows for you?
Top answer 1 of 5
40
The multi-agent orchestration is a nice UI, but like you say, it just makes it easier to do lazy vibe-coding. I also find that Gemini 3.0 is way more aggressive at doing stuff you probably don’t want. I started it in the wrong directory yesterday, and rather than stopping and telling me it didn’t have permissions, it was writing shell scripts to try and edit folders it didn’t have access to via normal tools! Very scary. For me, CLI tools are the sweet spot - make it write a design doc you give feedback on first. Let it run in yolo mode, but review the PR on GitHub just like you would with a junior dev. I also never like letting any agent touch git commands aside from log and diff - takes an extra 30 seconds to write commit messages but I don’t have to worry about it doing a bad rebase or force push, which is basically the only way it can seriously screw up more than an hour’s worth of work.
2 of 5
30
*Sonnet 4.5 I tried it too, but it often breaks my files. It'll need some time to mature.
Medium
medium.com › ai-software-engineer › i-tested-cursor-vs-antigravity-i-dont-trust-the-hype-anymore-b1625ebdd9e3
I Tested Cursor vs Antigravity (I Don’t Trust the Hype Anymore) | by Joe Njenga | AI Software Engineer | Dec, 2025 | Medium
2 weeks ago - We explores practical approaches for developers and teams who want to use AI tools in their coding process. ... After a week of rigorous testing, Google Antigravity is overhyped, especially compared to Cursor in coding.
Binary Verse AI
binaryverseai.com › home › ai agents and automation › google antigravity: is this agent first ide the cursor killer we have been waiting for?
Google Antigravity: 7 Powerful Ways It Outcodes Cursor IDE
Google Antigravity is the experimental lab where you let agents run wild on greenfield features. If you are chasing the best AI IDE label, the honest answer is this. Cursor still wins on reliability and UI smoothness.
Published November 19, 2025
iTechs Online
itecsonline.com › post › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-vs-copilot
Google Antigravity vs Cursor vs Copilot: Enterprise Dev Tool Guide | Blog // ITECS
November 19, 2025 - Google's new Antigravity platform introduces an agentic development paradigm where AI agents autonomously control your editor, terminal, and browser. This comprehensive analysis compares Antigravity's innovative artifact-based verification system against Cursor's rapid development velocity and GitHub Copilot's established enterprise compliance framework.
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Cursor vs Google Antigravity (it's a close one!) - YouTube
Cursor has been dominating the AI IDE space. But Google Antigravity might change that. In this video, I break down the differences between them and which I p...
Published 3 weeks ago
Awesome-antigravity
awesome-antigravity.com › blog › antigravity-vs-cursor
Awesome-antigravity
Verdict: Cursor wins for now, but Antigravity is catching up fast. ... Verdict: Antigravity is lighter on resources. Scenario: 2 developers, 3 months to build a SaaS product ... Week 1: "Build authentication system with Google OAuth" Week 2: "Create dashboard with user analytics" Week 3: "Add ...
Vertu
vertu.com › best post › google antigravity launched: gemini 3 agent platform vs. cursor & claude code
Google Antigravity: Agentic IDE Powered by Gemini 3 vs. Cursor & Claude Code Comparison
November 22, 2025 - While Cursor excels at integrating AI into familiar workflows and Claude Code provides terminal-first autonomous coding, Antigravity introduces a third paradigm: agent-first development with browser-based verification and multi-modal capabilities.
AI Engineer Guide
aiengineerguide.com › blog › google-antigravity-ai-ide
Google's Antigravity - AI IDE like Cursor
November 18, 2025 - Google has launched AI Editor similar to Cursor (yes, it is also a fork of VS Code) - Antigravity In terms of pricing, it is free right now - public preview And currently has these models 👇 - Gemini 3 Pro (High) - Gemini 3 Pro (Low) - Claude Sonnet 4.5 - Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) - GPT-OSS 120B (Medium) Yes, free Gemini 3.0 Pro and Sonnet.
Medium
medium.com › ai-software-engineer › i-tested-new-google-antigravity-ide-and-discovered-the-real-cursor-killer-96ffa7e55026
I Tested (New) Google Antigravity IDE (And Discovered the Real Cursor Killer) | by Joe Njenga | AI Software Engineer | Nov, 2025 | Medium
November 24, 2025 - Antigravity offers a much better AI coding model than Cursor’s recently built Composer. We’re talking about Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and GPT models all in one editor. If this won’t destroy Cursor’s dominance, nothing will.
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Google Antigravity vs. Cursor: 3 Features That Changed My Workflow - YouTube
Google Antigravity just released, and it might change how we code forever.In this video, I walk you through exactly how to set up Google Antigravity on your ...
Published November 22, 2025