Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity
Did Google Just Kill Cursor with Antigravity?
November 19, 2025 - Google launches Antigravity, a revolutionary AI-first IDE powered by Gemini 3 that outperforms Cursor in code generation, context awareness, and API integration. Developers now question if Cursor's dominance ends here.
Medium
medium.com › data-science-in-your-pocket › cursor-vs-google-antigravity-best-ai-ide-for-vibe-coders-f3ecbd02f161
Cursor vs Google AntiGravity : Best AI IDE for Vibe Coders? | by Mehul Gupta | Data Science in Your Pocket | Nov, 2025 | Medium
4 weeks ago - Choose Antigravity while it’s free → use it as your idea factory, your rapid-prototype engine, your “does this SaaS even work?” machine. ... The quality will be uneven. You’ll debug agent logic, not just code. Stability is not guaranteed. Choose Cursor Pro → it becomes your daily IDE, your feature refactor machine, your debugging companion.
Videos
09:08
Cursor vs Google Antigravity (it's a close one!) - YouTube
Google Antigravity VS Cursor - Which one to Choose? - YouTube
09:59
Google Antigravity just Killed Cursor... Forever - YouTube
34:50
Is Google Antigravity Better Than Cursor 2.0? - YouTube
13:24
Google's New "Antigravity" AI IDE: Better Than Cursor? (Review ...
Should I use Cursor, Antigravity, or both?
Use Cursor if you need a robust professional editor. Use Antigravity if you're budget-conscious or experimenting. Use both if you want multiple AI perspectives and maximum flexibility.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Does workflow with tools like Cursor evolve over time?
Yes. Most users spend months discovering features and optimizing their workflow. The true value of Cursor, for example, often emerges after exploring features like inline edits and Composer mode.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Is Cursor worth the $240/year?
For many professional developers, yes—time saved often outweighs the cost. For students or hobbyists, Antigravity may offer sufficient value for free. The ROI depends heavily on your workflow and income.
humai.blog
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
Reddit
reddit.com › r/cursor › cursor vs. google antigravity
r/cursor on Reddit: Cursor vs. Google Antigravity
1 week ago -
So I stumbled upon Google’s Antigravity IDE this morning. Their developer plan is a lot more generous than how Cursor prices its plans. The developer plan has higher rate limits that refresh every five hours, as opposed to Cursor, which makes you wait an entire billing cycle for the rate limit to reset, or charges you extra if you don’t want to wait.
Has anyone tried Antigravity by Google yet? If so, what are your impressions? Is it worth switching?
This is directed at Cursor....if you’re reading this, you need to restructure your plans so users aren’t rate-limited early or charged excessively after using Opus 4.5. You’ve got competition now.
Top answer 1 of 5
70
google can afford to give things out for free because they train on your data, they're a trillion dollar company, cursor is not, they can't give things for free
2 of 5
31
I started using Antigravity. I have a Google pro plan for free (new Samsung phone promotion), so I get very generous limits. I usually get a full day work in Opus before I reach the limit. It's still pretty buggy, but I feel like a little bit more polishing and it will replace cursor completely.
Apidog
apidog.com › blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which AI-Agent Editor Is Best for You?
November 21, 2025 - Q5. Should I switch tools now, or wait? It depends on your priorities. If you need stability and fast iteration, Cursor 2.0 is a strong choice now. If you want to experiment with Google’s new agent architecture and enjoy managing agents via ...
SourceForge
sourceforge.net › software › compare › Cursor-vs-Google-Antigravity
Cursor vs. Google Antigravity Comparison
Compare Cursor vs. Google Antigravity using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/vibecoding › google antigravity vs cursor
r/vibecoding on Reddit: Google antigravity vs cursor
1 month ago -
Hey everyone,
I just got anti gravity and I think I'm having some issues
I.e. I'm happy with Feature A, and 50 prompts later into other features, Feature A no longer works
Is this normal with vibe coding?
Top answer 1 of 2
1
Yeah, that's super common. You're essentially asking the AI to keep expanding the codebase without a solid blueprint, so each new feature can accidentally break or change assumptions from earlier work. The issue is that vibe coding works best for isolated tasks, but once you're juggling multiple features, the AI loses context about what made Feature A stable. It's like building on sand each time. What helps is being explicit about what shouldn't change. Before asking for new features, maybe document what Feature A does and its constraints so you can reference it. Or test Feature A whenever you add something significant. If you're dealing with this repeatedly, tools like Artiforge might actually save you time here. It generates proper documentation from your code and lets you plan changes upfront before implementation, so you know what could break. Beats the endless prompt cycle.
2 of 2
1
Yes its normal, learn some real coding first so you may prompt properly. No need to learn much even, just some.
Geeky Gadgets
geeky-gadgets.com › home › ai › gemini 3 antigravity vs cursor : is cursor finished?
Google Antigravity vs Cursor, Gemini 3 Pro AI Coding Review - Geeky Gadgets
November 22, 2025 - You’ll discover why Gemini 3 Pro’s multitasking prowess and precision make it a force to be reckoned with, and how Google’s ecosystem integration amplifies its reach. But it’s not all smooth sailing, early adopters have reported challenges, and the transition from platforms like Cursor isn’t without friction. As we unpack the implications of Antigravity’s rise, one thing becomes clear: the future of AI development may never look the same again.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/chatgptcoding › i tried google's new antigravity ide so you don't have to (vs cursor/windsurf)
r/ChatGPTCoding on Reddit: I tried Google's new Antigravity IDE so you don't have to (vs Cursor/Windsurf)
November 21, 2025 -
Google just dropped "Antigravity" (antigravity.google) and claims it's an "Agent-First" IDE. I've been using Cursor heavily for the past few months, so I decided to give this a spin to see if it's just hype or a real competitor.
My key takeaways after testing it:
The "Agent Manager" is the real deal: Unlike the linear chat in VS Code/Cursor, here you can spawn multiple agent threads. I managed to have one agent refactoring a messy LegacyUserProfile.js component while another agent was writing Jest tests for it simultaneously. It feels more like orchestration than coding.
Model Access: It currently offers Gemini 3 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet for free during the preview. That alone makes it worth the download.
Installation: It's a VS Code fork, so migration (extensions, keybindings) took about 30 seconds.
The "Vibe Coding" Trap: I noticed that because it's so powerful, it's easy to get lazy. I did a test run generating a Frontend component from a screenshot.
Attempt 1 (Lazy prompt): The code worked but the CSS was messy.
Attempt 2 (Senior prompt): I explicitly asked for BEM methodology and semantic HTML. The result was production-ready.
Conclusion: It might not kill Cursor today, but the multi-agent workflow is definitely superior for complex tasks.
I made a full video breakdown showing the installation and the 3-agent demo in action if you want to see the UI: https://youtu.be/M06VEfzFHZY?si=W_3OVIzrSJY4IXBv
Has anyone else tried the multi-agent feature yet? How does it compare to Windsurf's flows for you?
Top answer 1 of 5
40
The multi-agent orchestration is a nice UI, but like you say, it just makes it easier to do lazy vibe-coding. I also find that Gemini 3.0 is way more aggressive at doing stuff you probably don’t want. I started it in the wrong directory yesterday, and rather than stopping and telling me it didn’t have permissions, it was writing shell scripts to try and edit folders it didn’t have access to via normal tools! Very scary. For me, CLI tools are the sweet spot - make it write a design doc you give feedback on first. Let it run in yolo mode, but review the PR on GitHub just like you would with a junior dev. I also never like letting any agent touch git commands aside from log and diff - takes an extra 30 seconds to write commit messages but I don’t have to worry about it doing a bad rebase or force push, which is basically the only way it can seriously screw up more than an hour’s worth of work.
2 of 5
30
*Sonnet 4.5 I tried it too, but it often breaks my files. It'll need some time to mature.
DevelopmentCorporate
developmentcorporate.com › home › google antigravity vs. cursor: why technical superiority won’t win this agentic development platform war
Google Antigravity vs. Cursor: Why Technical Superiority Won't Win This Agentic Development Platform War - Development Corporate
November 23, 2025 - Antigravity outperforms Cursor technically, but execution, trust, and ecosystem momentum decide the real winner. Here’s why Cursor still leads despite Google’s advantage.
Humai
humai.blog › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-the-complete-comparison
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
3 weeks ago - Price: $0/month (completely free) Verdict: Worth trying immediately, but not a complete Cursor replacement yet · Antigravity positions itself as a "multi-model AI coding environment" that gives you access to Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and GPT-4 within a single interface. According to Google's announcement, it achieves 76.2% on the SWE-bench coding benchmark, which puts it in the elite tier of AI coding performance.
Banandre
banandre.com › home › blog › antigravity vs cursor: why google’s multi-model ide changes everything
Antigravity vs Cursor: Why Google’s Multi-Model IDE Changes Everything - Banandre
November 20, 2025 - Despite Day 0 updates, the community ... hampered by usability friction. While Cursor ties you to its ecosystem, Antigravity launches with model flexibility baked into its core architecture....
Metana
metana.io › metana | career-focused coding bootcamp › metana | career-focused coding bootcamp › ai & machine learning › ai & machine learning › google antigravity vs cursor: ai-powered coding ides differences › ai automation › google antigravity vs cursor: ai-powered coding ides differences
Google Antigravity vs Cursor: AI-Powered Coding IDEs Differences
1 month ago - Antigravity leans into agent first automation with a central control system, while Cursor delivers fast, developer guided multi agent workflows. This comparison breaks down their differences in autonomy, speed, safety, and practical use to
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Google Antigravity vs. Cursor: 3 Features That Changed My Workflow - YouTube
Google Antigravity just released, and it might change how we code forever.In this video, I walk you through exactly how to set up Google Antigravity on your ...
Published November 22, 2025
Reddit
reddit.com › r/cursor › google antigravity is better
r/cursor on Reddit: Google Antigravity is better
November 18, 2025 -
I think that Google Antigravity is better than Cursor.
CometAPI
cometapi.com › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-2-0
Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which IDE should you choose in 2025? - CometAPI - All AI Models in One API
3 weeks ago - That gives Google the advantage when you want deep Gemini optimizations (latency, tool access, specialized capabilities). Cursor 2.0 ships its own Composer model—optimized for coding and agentic tasks—and emphasizes fast inference and practical throughput for developer tasks. Cursor also remains model-agnostic in many integrations, enabling teams to choose the model that best fits cost and accuracy requirements. Verdict: Expect Antigravity to shine when Gemini-specific features matter (tooling synergy, LLM-native interfaces).
Stackademic
blog.stackademic.com › i-compared-google-antigravity-against-cursor-ai-across-real-engineering-workflows-0eb4a2abba9e
I Compared Google Antigravity Against Cursor AI Across Real ...
November 23, 2025 - I Compared Google Antigravity Against Cursor AI Across Real Engineering Workflows…. A lived-in comparison of Antigravity vs Cursor AI covering speed, accuracy, security, data residency, and large-repo performance..
Medium
medium.com › ai-software-engineer › i-tested-cursor-vs-antigravity-i-dont-trust-the-hype-anymore-b1625ebdd9e3
I Tested Cursor vs Antigravity (I Don’t Trust the Hype Anymore) | by Joe Njenga | AI Software Engineer | Dec, 2025 | Medium
2 weeks ago - I Tested Cursor vs Antigravity (I Don’t Trust the Hype Anymore) After a week of rigorous testing, Google Antigravity is overhyped, especially compared to Cursor in coding. There are some subtle …
Vertu
vertu.com › best post › google antigravity launched: gemini 3 agent platform vs. cursor & claude code
Google Antigravity: Agentic IDE Powered by Gemini 3 vs. Cursor & Claude Code Comparison
November 22, 2025 - Future pricing has not been announced, but will likely integrate with Google Cloud and Google One AI Premium subscriptions. ... For comparison, one developer spent approximately $2 worth of their monthly Cursor subscription on a set of coding tasks ... The same coding tasks cost approximately $8 with Claude Code, making it roughly 4x more expensive than Cursor for that particular workload · The platform is still in early public preview, with feedback focusing on its innovative agent-first architecture. The Antigravity team is blunt in their positioning: “you've been elevated to a manager of agents,” with UI clearly built for pair programming alongside coding agents.
iTechs Online
itecsonline.com › post › google-antigravity-vs-cursor-vs-copilot
Google Antigravity vs Cursor vs Copilot: Enterprise Dev Tool Guide | Blog // ITECS
November 19, 2025 - Google's new Antigravity platform introduces an agentic development paradigm where AI agents autonomously control your editor, terminal, and browser. This comprehensive analysis compares Antigravity's innovative artifact-based verification system against Cursor's rapid development velocity and GitHub Copilot's established enterprise compliance framework.
Binary Verse AI
binaryverseai.com › home › ai agents and automation › google antigravity: is this agent first ide the cursor killer we have been waiting for?
Google Antigravity: 7 Powerful Ways It Outcodes Cursor IDE
Cursor centers on the Composer and inline chat. You ask for refactors, tests, or new modules and it writes them directly into your files. Google Antigravity centers on the Agent Manager.
Published November 19, 2025