I’ve notice that there is a trend on X of using Grok AI to remove the clothing of models. Even some as young as 16. I just wanted to warn everyone here in case you have photos on X.

Over the summer and into the fall I used Grok to generate images and I was amazed. I’m an artist and I admit most of it was for fun to go down image paths that I’d never be able to do myself in the studio. The childish fever dream of Grok 1 was habit forming. Sure, novelty value at first was amazing, but I soon settled into a groove and found it to be a fun tool to push ideas.

As Grok matured it became more realistic and pedestrian in its responses and much less flexible. Grok 2 was fine but I could see a definite shift away from the crazy to the conventional. I used it through the winter often with good results, but now it’s become awful.

Looking at Grok now I have to assume image making is not a priority. Though looking at reddit people keep trying to make porn so there might be an exception there. Anyway now it’s inflexible and creatively next to useless.

Sort of as a PS I used Google’s AI and it was much more fun, not Grok 1 fun, but it’ll do.

• What? The Guardian reports that xAI's Grok chatbot lacks safety filters sufficient to prevent users from generating sexually explicit "undressed" images of real people, including minors.

• So What? This represents a massive failure in AI safety ethics that endangers vulnerable populations and serves as a rallying point for communicators to demand strict, enforceable AI regulation.

• Now What? Watch for immediate legal challenges from child safety advocacy groups and potential platform bans on app stores; follow Center for Humane Technology for expert commentary.

Elon fanboys are as usual shilling for their messiah on Twitter, but I expect that on Reddit at least people will be more objective. The xAI team had absolutely no input on the image generator model as far as I am aware (nothing mentioned in the blog post also). It seems that they just signed an agreement with the Black Forest Labs and use their model. You can actually download the model for free from Huggingface and use it. And also sign up for their API to access the pro model. They deserve great applause for carrying the torch from Stable Diffusion in democratizing access to top tier AI models. Below are the ways of how you can access the model directly.

https://blackforestlabs.ai/#get-flux

This Guardian investigation reveals how X’s AI tool, Grok, sparked a global harassment campaign in early 2026. It details the explosion of the "put her in a bikini" trend, which saw users generating thousands of non-consensual, sexualized (and often violent) images of women and minors per hour.

Every single grok imagine generated videos and their uploaded images are publicly accessible for anyone with a link. There is no option for the user to turn link sharing off and there is no option for the user to delete the entry as well.

such a wierd choice to make it this way i guess...

Last 24 hrs grok image generation has changed to same as grok imagine model data set, if anyone has to talk about it Share your opinion below.

How’s the review? I heard it’s better than sora and Gemini ?

Any way to test it before getting supergrok subscription?

It doesn't exist.

People here want this giant AI systems that cost billions in compute, talent, infrastructure, and R&D to just magically appear out of thin air for us to use for zero dollars.

I mean, why would companies pour obscene amounts of money into training these models only to hand them out like free cookies.

People keep asking for a completely free alternative to Grok, but the truth is these models don’t exist, and there’s a reason they don’t. They are expensive and they have to be. No company has billions of dollars to burn just so they can give you a free product.

I've had a fairly good set of NSFW image prompts that have had a high success rate for months now, but across multiple accounts tonight I'm noticing nothing is generating off of them. I suppose I have the tons of images I've already created that I can start going back through and re-try generating video off of those, but I'm really not a fan of how re-generating images in the chat creates multiple threads that you have to weave through to find anything. Grok always feels like it has so much potential, but then it's like every week it's two steps back and one step forward.

edit: Also odd, though I've noticed this for a few weeks at least, it seems to be flipping through different i2v models, seemingly at random. Same image, same video prompt can produce wildly different variations on the video. I just had one video that was a sort of weird anti-robot model. It still did the zoom in, but the movements were hyper-fast and weird. I think I also got a 10sec video, but movement quality was just ok-ish. It's just an NSFW AI slop slot machine at this point.

Hello everyone, i've brought some worrying observations... Last month (28 December 2024, to be precise) i tried Grok's capabilities at generating real life actors and was really amazed. I mean, it seemed like pure magic. They genuinely looked like real highly detailed photos with almost no hint of AI generation. Today, i revisited this fun stuff and tried to generate more images with the same prompts. It looks uneasy, to say the least. I've tried ~100 generations so far and every single one of them has obvious hints that it's a generated image. The eyes are dead, the details are blurred and smeared away

Please take a look at these images. Every 1st image is from December 2024, and every 2nd is from now.

Listed actors: Jensen Ackles, Jared Padalecki, Maisie Williams, Kit Harrington, Sean Bean
It's a clear downgrade that shows consistently in the same facial traits. Eyes, most of all. Back in December i was blown away by how insanely accurate eyes were. Now they're... non existent