I wrote an in-depth comparison of Grok 3 against GPT-4, Google Gemini, and DeepSeek V3. Thought I'd share some key takeaways:

1. Grok 3 excels in reasoning and coding tasks, outperforming others in math benchmarks like AIME.

2. Its "Think" and "Big Brain" modes are impressive for complex problem-solving.

3. However, it falls short in real-time data integration compared to Google Gemini.

4. The $40/month subscription might be a dealbreaker for some users.

5. Each tool has its strengths: GPT-4 for creative writing, Gemini for real-time search, and DeepSeek for efficiency.

The choice really depends on your specific needs. For instance, if you're doing a lot of coding or mathematical work, Grok 3 might be worth the investment. But if you need up-to-the-minute info, Gemini could be a better fit.

For those interested, I've got a more detailed breakdown here: https://aigptjournal.com/explore-ai/ai-guides/grok-3-vs-other-ai-tools/

What's your experience with these AI tools? Any features you find particularly useful or overrated?

Best for general information, scientific subjects, language learning, solving Maths exercises, etc?

I tested different LLMs to check their ability to create SVG images in different ways. I believe this is a good way to test for their visual and spatial reasoning (which will be essential for AGI). It's a field where there's still lots of improvement to be had and there isn't as much available testing data for training. It's all one shot and with no tools.

Didn't use Claude Opus because it's too expensive, and I didn't use other models because I wanted to limit it to these four that are recent and priced around the same range. I mainly wanted to test Grok 4 against the others to see if it really was such a jump given its results in other benchmarks, but I must say I'm disappointed in its results here.