Idle power consumption is a really big topic, and it's easy to make a mistake that costs you a lot of power. Some notes from my own looking into this: * It seems that chiplet based CPUs have higher idle than monolithic ones. I don't completely know why but I guess chiplets have to keep the inter-chip links active. Both Intel and AMD now have chiplet and monolithic CPUs in their ranges. * Do consider overall power not just idle. For example, Intel CPUs up to 14th gen have very low idle, but 13th and 14th were notoriously power hungry under load compared to AMD. Unless your machine is idle almost all of the time the overall power might be higher even if the idle time power was lower. Intels Core Ultra chips are better for load power efficiency, but are chiplet based so have higher idle again. It very much depends on your use case, is this a server, NAS, or gaming machine etc. * Very low CPU power is achieved by putting the CPU into higher C states - basically turning off and putting to sleep various bits of the CPU. Many things can prevent this happening. Some hardware will refuse to go to sleep properly and keep the CPU awake along with it (this might be a legacy issue, though I think some NICs are still culprits here). * Similarly, a lot of low idle power discussion is focussed on Linux based servers, where idle really is idle. Windows has a habit of pissing about in the background which will prevent the CPU from reaching properly low idle power. * Think about your power supply. The standard rating systems don't measure them down at 20w-40w or so, and even within the same rating there can be a lot of variation there. At 30w system idle power, a PSU at 85% efficiency will be adding 5w. A different PSU that only achieves 60% efficiency that low will be adding 20w. Both of these PSUs could be gold rated as that's measured at higher power. * Wolfgangs channel on Youtube is a very good resource for idle power discussions. He focusses on servers, but it would apply to any hardware. He also has a spreadsheet of power supply idle efficiencies, and has build videos using both AMD and Intel devices for low power. Answer from FredFarms on reddit.com
Top answer
1 of 3
2
I can't speak to HWINFO's accuracy, but adding the processor and video card and motherboard consumption will generally give you a good idea of how large a power supply you will need. Other components will obviously require further power, but these three tend to account for 90%+ in a typical build, unless you have a massive number of HDs, fully buffered ram, or some high power consumption PCI cards, etc. If you want further assurance you can check your build against something like PCPartPicker.com. Though note that a lot of these places use the CPU's listed TDP, which is not always a good idea. AMD tends to do okay in this area (though I don't know about the Ryzens) but the TDP listed for Intel parts is often much lower than what the CPU will draw when maxed out. Either way, this should be accounted for in the heardroom you give yourself when selecting a power supply. If you plan to overclock you will certainly be looking at higher power consumption. The Ryzen 1600 and the RX 580 will put you at about 250W. Not sure what motherboard you are looking at, and what you plan to put in there besides, but I would be very surprised if you ended up with a system that couldn't run happily on a 400W supply, which seem to be about where the respectable brands start, though the 450Ws don't seem to cost hardly any more. Whether you want to get a larger supply so that you can add a beefier processor (AM4 is a new socket, so you might want to keep this motherboard through a couple CPU upgrades) or upgrade to a higher consumption GPU in future (or dual GPUs) is up to you. A larger supply would also run a bit cooler, which means possibly less fan noise, and certainly longer life.
2 of 3
1
It all depends how many power measuring sensors your system has. For example my system is pulling 230w from the wall at the moment but in HWinfo CPU package and GPU chip combined are only 120w. And I don't have much else in terms of power consumption to go on.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/sffpc › what’s your rig’s cpu package minimum power consumption on hwinfo (when idle)? what processor are you using?
r/sffpc on Reddit: What’s your rig’s CPU package minimum power consumption on HWInfo (when idle)? What processor are you using?
October 18, 2025 -

Just got a FormD T1 and studying whether to put in an Intel or AMD. Checking reviews and comments in forums, AMD is known for high idle power consumption. Sounds really inefficient to me, finding it hard to accept this by principle and leaning towards Intel. What’s the lowest idle power consumption a modern AMD CPU can achieve? And through what means (BIOS, Windows config, etc.)?

Top answer
1 of 13
9
It’s an odd thing to base your purchase on. Have you done the math on how much it would cost per hour of use for electricity between each CPU? Do you leave your computer on all of the time? What about power draw when you are actually using it? An AMD chip could be more efficient during use. To each their own though.
2 of 13
7
Idle power consumption is a really big topic, and it's easy to make a mistake that costs you a lot of power. Some notes from my own looking into this: * It seems that chiplet based CPUs have higher idle than monolithic ones. I don't completely know why but I guess chiplets have to keep the inter-chip links active. Both Intel and AMD now have chiplet and monolithic CPUs in their ranges. * Do consider overall power not just idle. For example, Intel CPUs up to 14th gen have very low idle, but 13th and 14th were notoriously power hungry under load compared to AMD. Unless your machine is idle almost all of the time the overall power might be higher even if the idle time power was lower. Intels Core Ultra chips are better for load power efficiency, but are chiplet based so have higher idle again. It very much depends on your use case, is this a server, NAS, or gaming machine etc. * Very low CPU power is achieved by putting the CPU into higher C states - basically turning off and putting to sleep various bits of the CPU. Many things can prevent this happening. Some hardware will refuse to go to sleep properly and keep the CPU awake along with it (this might be a legacy issue, though I think some NICs are still culprits here). * Similarly, a lot of low idle power discussion is focussed on Linux based servers, where idle really is idle. Windows has a habit of pissing about in the background which will prevent the CPU from reaching properly low idle power. * Think about your power supply. The standard rating systems don't measure them down at 20w-40w or so, and even within the same rating there can be a lot of variation there. At 30w system idle power, a PSU at 85% efficiency will be adding 5w. A different PSU that only achieves 60% efficiency that low will be adding 20w. Both of these PSUs could be gold rated as that's measured at higher power. * Wolfgangs channel on Youtube is a very good resource for idle power discussions. He focusses on servers, but it would apply to any hardware. He also has a spreadsheet of power supply idle efficiencies, and has build videos using both AMD and Intel devices for low power.
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
Calculating Power Draw with HWInfo Confusion? | HWiNFO® Forum
June 16, 2023 - As for the CPU, the "CPU Package Power" should be the total power consumed by the CPU and you should not not sum that up with other CPU power values as they cover only certain sub-parts that are already included in the total/package value. There are multiple rails driven to the CPU and only ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/intel › what is included in the package power shown in hwinfo64?
r/intel on Reddit: What is included in the Package Power shown in HWInfo64?
May 14, 2019 -

Hey there,

I am running an Intel i7 6700K and am currently struggling to identify the main drivers of package power as shown in HWInfo64.
This CPU is powering a laptop that does not utilize the integrated graphics (discrete GPU, no Optimus, no way to output from the integrated GPU to the display).
Yet even though I am seeing an idle power consumption just below 2W for the IA cores (which I understand to be the CPU's actual cores), the idling power consumption of the package is about 13W.
Due to the CPU possessing an integrated graphics chip, I'd assume that this is idling as well or might even turn off.
The device is equipped with two DDR4 dimms of 32GB Ram in total.
But even considering this information, I am having a hard time understanding what is actually responsible for the package power.

Do you have any idea where those 11W (13W package power minus 2W for the IA cores) are going?

Thank you very much in advance.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/amd › does anyone know why ppt (or package power) is 10w higher than the sum of core power and soc power?
r/Amd on Reddit: Does anyone know why PPT (or Package power) is 10W higher than the sum of Core Power and SOC Power?
February 24, 2020 -

When checking the power draw of my Ryzen 3950X using Ryzen Master or HWInfo I've seen that PPT (or Package Power in HWInfo) is always ~10W higher than the sum of Core Power and SOC power. It doesn't matter if it's at idle or at full load.

Does anywone know why that is? What else is included in PPT apart from Core power and SOC power?

I also have a Kaby Lake CPU (laptop) and I've seen that in that case the sum of IA cores power+iGPU power+DRAM power always equals rougly Package Power. Are the package power measurements directly comparable, or is HWInfo measuring different things in the different CPUs?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/overclocking › hwinfo64-need help finding the correct cpu power/energy consumptio
r/overclocking on Reddit: HWINFO64-Need help finding the correct CPU power/energy consumptio
July 24, 2024 - However i've read that it increases power consumption because all cores are awake and fully working. I tried using HWINFO64's sensor mode and checked the "CPU Package Power" section.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/xmg_gg › psa: latest hwinfo64 7.00 increases power consumption in idle. upgrade to 7.01 beta!
r/XMG_gg on Reddit: PSA: Latest HWiNFO64 7.00 increases power consumption in Idle. Upgrade to 7.01 Beta!
March 18, 2021 -

Hi everyone,

HWiNFO64 7.00 was released on March 9, 2021.

Compared to previous 6.42, the new version has negative impact on CPU Power Consumption in Idle.

  • CPU Package Power goes up from ~1W to ~13W

  • CPU Package C8 Residency % goes down from ~64% to Zero

Thankfully, the latest Beta 7.01 Beta 4410 already seems to have fixed this issue.

All download links: https://www.hwinfo.com/

Comparison:

Average values after 1 minute Idle Line chart during 1 minute Idle. Logarithmic scale. C8 Residency for 7.00 not shown because it is "0" (zero) all the time.

Test configuration:

  • XMG FUSION 15

  • BIOS 0122

  • BIOS Setup "Load Defaults" and "Fast Boot" enabled

  • Windows 20H2 (Build 19042.867)

  • All latest drivers from Intel Driver & Support Assistant

  • Control Center 2.2.0.18

  • WiFi connected, low LCD Brightness, no peripherals except USB mouse, KB B/L off

  • Windows Startup cleaned up, no apps running in the background

  • Silent Performance Profile, running on Battery power

Potentially related:

  • HWINFO64 v7.00-4400 results in increased CPU utilization by the system process

Conclusion:

  • Don't use v7.00 for testing system power consumption in Idle

  • Use v6.42 or the latest 7.xx Beta

If you have any thoughts or insights on this, please share below. :-)

// Tom

P.S.: shout-out to u/Florida-Rolf who tipped me off in this post.

🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
CPU Package Power at very high polling rates above power limit | HWiNFO® Forum
May 5, 2023 - I also noticed that at very high polling rates the PL sensors' "Max" entry only gets clear after about 2 seconds when I hit the Clear button while idle, so maybe HWinfo is internally overloaded with these polling-rates and thus doesn't always output the PL sensor triggers in time!? You must log in or register to reply here. ... Total System Power is more than CPU Package Power,GPU ASIC Power during a load.
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
CPU Package Power: Strange results | HWiNFO® Forum
January 30, 2019 - Hey there, I started HWInfo (newest version) to see how much power my 7820x needs under full AVX load (4.2GHz incl. AVX offset) and HWInfo tells me it needs about 1.7W, what would be very nice but is obviously wrong. So I started Core Temp (newest version) and got the same results. So I...
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
Full CPU power consumption | HWiNFO® Forum
February 28, 2024 - For example: If a specific rail at some point has 1.1V and 100A, then power at that moment on that rail is 110W Volts and Ampere on a CPU are highly dynamic depending on load. ... If you mean the entire CPU package then all CPUs have multiple rails. 1 for cores, 1 for SoC and probably 1-2 more ...
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
how to read APU power consumption properly? | HWiNFO® Forum
July 27, 2022 - EDIT: okay, by now I found some older threads here on this forum, which kind of answer my question. according to here1 and here2, either CPU Package Power, or CPU PPT, or alternatively APU STAPM are enough to check the APU's total power (one of these values, not all 3 together).
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
CPU Package / CPU Core Power | HWiNFO® Forum
January 4, 2019 - The fact that CPU Core Power (SVI2 TFN) reported is so high (even higher than CPU Package Power) means, there's some glitch in the measurement. It's most probably an occasional invalid measurement during a transient state.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/amd › explaining the amd ryzen "power reporting deviation" -metric in hwinfo
r/Amd on Reddit: Explaining the AMD Ryzen "Power Reporting Deviation" -metric in HWiNFO
June 17, 2020 -

The newly released v6.27-4185 Beta version of HWiNFO added support for "Power Reporting Deviation" -metric, for AM4 Ryzen CPUs. Access to this metric might become handy, when trying to find out why the CPUs might run abnormally hot on certain motherboards, or simply where the performance differences between the different motherboard might originate from.

https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/explaining-the-amd-ryzen-power-reporting-deviation-metric-in-hwinfo.6456/

Update 06/17/2020: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/gz1lg8/explaining_the_amd_ryzen_power_reporting/fv5au73/

Top answer
1 of 5
59
Thanks for this write up and time put in on this research. This forum sees a handful of posts about temperature concerns some more relevant than others. I think the more tech inclined have known for some time that manufactures have used little tricks to make their boards bench higher than boards adhering to AMD/Intel stock spec. Hopefully these new metrics will help us figure out which boards/bios are running too far out of spec so users buying those boards will know what they are getting into at the very least. The Stilt's "TLDR" for those interested: "In short: Some motherboard manufacturers intentionally declare an incorrect (too small) motherboard specific reference value in AGESA. Since AM4 Ryzen CPUs rely on telemetry sourced from the motherboard VRM to determine their power consumption, declaring an incorrect reference value will affect the power consumption seen by the CPU. For instance, if the motherboard manufacturer would declare 50% of the correct value, the CPU would think it consumes half the power than it actually does. In this case, the CPU would allow itself to consume twice the power of its set power limits, even when at stock. It allows the CPU to clock higher due to the effectively lifted power limits however, it also makes the CPU to run hotter and potentially negatively affects its life-span, same ways as overclocking does. The difference compared to overclocking or using AMD PBO, is that this is done completely clandestine and that in the past, there has been no way for most of the end-users to detect it, or react to it."
2 of 5
19
Well that is interesting. That article makes clear why some companies might bias their power consumption figures for better performance, but seems to say little about why they might go in the opposite direction. With F@H running on core 4-6, it reports a deviation of ~130%, and under mostly idle loads, it seems to report around 200%, on my Gigabyte B450M-DS3H. Edit: And around 127% during a run of Cinebench R20 https://imgur.com/a/17nO2gz Edit: Seeing as The-Stilt answered my question in another comment, and that hasn't gotten much attention, here it is~ r/Amd/comments/gz1lg8/explaining_the_amd_ryzen_power_reporting/fv5au73/
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/overclocking › how can i find out my systems total wattage used?
r/overclocking on Reddit: How can I find out my systems total wattage used?
May 19, 2024 -

Can I use hwmonitor and find out my systems total wattage being used? I would really like to know. I notice I am able to view my GPU wattage and my CPU wattage and combine the two but that doesn't take into account my monitors and fans, SSD, etc. How can I do this without a physical meter? Thanks.

🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › bug reports › hwinfo® 32 or hwinfo® 64 bug reports
CPU Power Package reports extremely high values even though temps are lows | HWiNFO® Forum
January 27, 2023 - Ryzen CPUs for AM4 platform rely on external, motherboard sourced telemetry to determine their power consumption. The voltage, current and power telemetry is provided to the processor by the motherboard VRM controller through the AMD SVI2 interface.
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
Normal Package Power and Power Consumption for CPU? | HWiNFO® Forum
June 4, 2023 - Total System Power is more than CPU Package Power,GPU ASIC Power during a load.
🌐
HWiNFO
hwinfo.com › home › forums › general › general discussion
CPU Wattage question | HWiNFO® Forum
September 7, 2023 - So on the tooltips of CPU Package Power and IA Cores Power, it says the usage is based on the SVID VR Telemetry which requires SVID to be enabled. However, i have SVID Control disabled in BIOS (asus z87-k + i7-4770k). Does this mean the two values i am seeing of the package and the ia cores...