What are these temps in HWMonitor and are they too high ?
Ryzen Master vs HWMonitor - who to trust?
Ryzen master should report the temp exactly now, accounting for AMD's 20 degree offset. If you're looking at a program that isn't Ryzen master just subtract 20 degrees.
More on reddit.comRyzen master or HwMonitor temperature
HWMonitor updated with official Ryzen support!
Hey guys, so i just built my PC today (the full list of specs are listed below). After building i did the usual fresh installation of windows 10, followed by mobo, chispet, GPU, LAN drivers etc , everything all seems fine, even ran a "Userbenchmark test", and was given positive User Benchmark results
The problem i am having is that core temps arent showing in the HWMonitor application.. I have tried researching other cases, but have found no solutions, any idea why this could be? I see "Package(Node 0)" under the CPU section reporting temps but no core temps. "CPU temp" is also listed under the motherboard section, giving similar results to the "Package(Node 0) so im not sure which ones i should be using, whether its misreading, or not reading temps at all? Please look at the screenshot provided below of the temp readings. Im worried because after gaming for 40-60 mins the CPU temps under both motherboard and the Ryzen CPU section were reporting in the mid 80's, the graphic card was find surprisingly only 60 degrees even though the game was being ran maxed out, so i dont think its the airflow of the case. Any ideas?
HWMontior RESULTS (idle after gaming , wheres the core temps??)
CPU: Ryzen 3600
Motherboard: MSI Tomahawk B450 MAX
RAM: 16GB 3200Mhz
GPU: MSI TRIO X 2070 SUPER
SSD: SAMSUNG EVO 840
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro
As the titles summs, which of those is the best for temps monitoring? Have used HWinfo before clean installing W10 and cleaning CMOS (had a bunch of errors because a I switched from 1600 AF + B450M DS3H to 5600X + B550-F Gaming (Wi-Fi), and the software always showed my clocks as 4.6GHx ot 3.2GHz, so I gave it up, but I don't really know if it was a bug from the hardware switch, so I'm asking here now, which one is better? Will not use Ryzen Master, MSI Afterburner or lowkeys software, I rather stick with one of those.
On my system I initially installed HWMonitor, and experienced lots of hard lock ups which I had to then restart my computer. This would happen every 1-5 hours.
In short, I was using HWMonitor to monitor any bizarre temps, clocks, etc... and nothing. Turns out the common denominator was HWMonitor, and I stopped using it and the lock ups went away.
Using HWiNFO64 now and nothing since.
I use hwinfo64 on my r5 5600x. I used it on my r5 1600 before and it always reports correct and more than enough.