🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › iphone 17 pro main camera sensor 'smaller' than iphone 16 pro sensor
r/apple on Reddit: iPhone 17 Pro Main Camera Sensor 'Smaller' Than iPhone 16 Pro Sensor
December 5, 2024 - Binning works quite fine so a 48mp sensor downsampled to 12mp and a 12mp native sensor should be near identical given the same sensor size. ... Can’t take an SLR with you everywhere.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › sensor size of main camera are difference in the 17 base and pro?
r/iphone on Reddit: Sensor size of main camera are difference in the 17 base and Pro?
September 10, 2025 -

According to gsmarena:

17 Pro main camera:
48 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS

17 base main camera:
48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS

17 Pro seems to have a larger sensor size? Is this right?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › [petapixel] iphone 17 pro & pro max review for photographers!
r/apple on Reddit: [PetaPixel] iPhone 17 Pro & Pro Max Review For Photographers!
September 17, 2025 - It’s a 2x sensor crop on a 48mp sensor. So it should be 12mp. Continue this thread ... There is not much review on main and ultrawide cameras of the vanilla iPhone 17.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › iphone camera sensor size comparison
r/iphone on Reddit: iPhone camera sensor size comparison
February 16, 2025 -

I stumbled across this chart comparing iPhone camera sensor sizes and it’s interesting to see how far we’ve come but also how backwards Apple has gone with the 16e.

A sensor the size of the iPhone XS with 4 times more but smaller pixels just seems wrong. And I know it’s a “budget” iPhone and that it does pixel binning, but it makes me wonder how Apple is relying way more on software rather than hardware here.

Anyone else thinking the same thing?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › actual and full frame equiv. specs for iphone 17 pro/max cameras
r/iphone on Reddit: Actual and Full Frame Equiv. Specs for iPhone 17 Pro/Max Cameras
October 27, 2025 -

I couldn't find any "actual" iPhone 17 Pro/Max camera specs anywhere online to so I thought it would post it here.

CameraActual Specs *Sensor Size **Crop Factor ***FF Equiv. SpecsFF Equiv. Specs (Rounded)
Ultra Wide Angle (0.5x)2.22mm f/2.21/2.55 Type (base ISO 15)5.86x (13/2.22)13mm f/12.9~13mm f/11
Wide Angle (1x)6.765mm f/1.781/1.28 Type (base ISO 54)3.55x (24/6.765)24mm f/6.3~24mm f/5.6
Telephoto (4x)16.8906mm f/2.798831/2.55 Type (base ISO 15)5.92x (100/16.8906)100mm f/16.6100mm f/16

* The actual camera lens specs for the new iPhone 17 Pro verified with Lightroom

** The sensor size is taken from PetaPixel's review of the phone. The base ISO was found in Halide/Moment apps

*** The crop factor of the 3 cameras calculated using some simple math comparing the actual focal length to the advertised full frame equivalent focal length

P.S. I'm a semi-pro photographer and have been shooting for about 20 years. I currently shoot with a Canon R6 II + 24-70mm f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8 for travel/events/weddings/etc. I was looking to get the new iPhone 17 Pro instead of getting a dedicated pocket camera (~1 inch type sensor size) and to upgrade from an iPhone 13 mini so I wanted to know what "look" I'd get with the iPhone 17 Pro.

🌐
GSMArena
gsmarena.com › apple_iphone_17-review-2886p6.php
Apple iPhone 17 review: Camera, photo and video quality
As far as we can tell, this is ... sure of the sensor model (our best guess is a Sony IMX972), but it has a 1/2.55" size and 0.7µm pixels....
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › apple store says iphone 17 has 5x optical zoom?
r/iphone on Reddit: Apple Store says iPhone 17 has 5x optical zoom?
October 7, 2025 -

Hi all,

I’m thinking of upgrading from my iPhone 13. I’ll probably go for the base model 17 as I think it’s the best value for money. One thing that draws me to the pro is the telephoto lens offering much superior zoom but I don’t think that alone is worth an extra £300.

When comparing the 17 and 17 pro on the Apple Store, I noticed what looks like a discrepancy in the optical zoom specs for the 17. In the summary part it states the 17 has up to 2x optical zoom, but then in the “more details” section further down, it states it also has 5x optical zoom.

Is this just an error in the details on the App Store or am I misunderstanding something? If the 17 really has 5x optical zoom then that makes my decision a lot easier but unfortunately I doubt that’s the case.

Any help of clarification is appreciated!

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › iphone 17: a photographer's review
r/apple on Reddit: iPhone 17: A Photographer's Review
August 7, 2025 - ... He is reviewing the Pro, so the "mistake" is the title, not the thumbnail, and it's a pretty minor one ... Yes, with iPhone 17's new 18MP Center Stage front camera your nuts will be automatically framed as well as Macro mode for close up.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › iphone 17 pro camera review: rule of three
r/apple on Reddit: iPhone 17 Pro Camera Review: Rule of Three
September 25, 2025 - Naturally this would make no difference ... is very clear. ??? 6x-7x on the 14 Pro would be awful digital zoom. 8x on the 17 Pro is an optical crop in....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › iphone 17 pro: new 48mp telephoto lens may change how zoom works
r/apple on Reddit: iPhone 17 Pro: New 48MP Telephoto Lens May Change How Zoom Works
April 3, 2025 - Yup, and I think a 16e/17e is enough for those shots. ... I do prefer the 48 MP f/2.8 113mm 5x optical periscope telephoto on the Pixel 9 Pro, but the iPhone's colors are just better. Continue this thread ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › iphone 17 pro max. which of 3 lenses are purely optical vs. sensor crops?
r/iphone on Reddit: iPhone 17 Pro Max. Which of 3 lenses are purely optical vs. sensor crops?
September 24, 2025 -

I recently purchased a iPhone 17 Pro Max.

I noticed the camera zoom options are 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x & 8x. I am wondering which zoom options correlate to a dedicated lens and which are sensor crops of another lens.

There are 3 lenses on the back of the phone.

I believe the 0.5x is a optical lens using the ultra-wide lens.

The 1x also appears to be a purely optical lens using the wide/primary lens.

  • However, when I am using 1x, and if I obscure the lens, the iPhone will automatically switch to the 0.5x (ultra-wide lens) and crop accordingly, so this would mean the 1x is only an optical lens if the 1x lens is available? If not, there must be some sensor cropping of the 0.5 lens taking place.

  • Another point that indicates the 1x is not a solely a dedicated lens is when I double tap on the 1x the zoom changes from 28mm to 35mm, slightly zooming in while still apparently using the same lens. I am assuming this must be a sensor crop.

The 2x uses the same lens as the 1x, so the 2x must is a sensor crop of the 1x lens.

The 4x appears to be an optical lens using the telephoto lens.

The 4x and 8x appear to use the same lens, so I would have to assume the 8x is a sensor crop of the 4x lens.

  • However, if you obscure either the 4x or the 8x, the iPhone will switch automatically to another lens in what must be a sensor crop. So the 4x is only a dedicated lens if it is not obscured?

Would someone more informed than me please educate me on this subject? Have I got this right?

Also, is there a way to prevent the iPhone from doing any sensor crops at all? In order to maximize the true image resolution and avoid any software pixel interpolation?

Thank you.

🌐
MacRumors
macrumors.com › 2025 › 01 › 10 › iphone-17-pro-main-camera-sensor-smaller
iPhone 17 Pro Main Camera Sensor 'Smaller' Than iPhone 16 Pro Sensor - MacRumors
January 10, 2025 - The claim is part of a wider leak allegedly revealing that both iPhone 17 Pro models will have three 48MP cameras for the first time. The sensor size notation originates from an old system used for video camera tubes, where the fraction represents ...
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/apple › apple unveils iphone 17: 120 fps display, a19 chip, upgraded camera
r/apple on Reddit: Apple unveils iPhone 17: 120 FPS display, A19 chip, upgraded camera
September 9, 2025 - I have really enjoyed the 16 pro cameras but the 17 pro looks like a solid evolution in just a year’s time. The larger front facing sensor on all of them is rad as hell though, 2x sensor size is a huge improvement.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › what if.. iphone 17 pro had a 1-inch camera sensor (black titanium)
r/iphone on Reddit: What if.. iPhone 17 Pro had a 1-inch camera sensor (Black Titanium)
July 13, 2025 - 1-inch is all annoying marketing BS because the actual sensor size is nowhere near 1". ... Then…I would’ve bought it. But of course only in black, because it’s the pro color /s ... And still will have a better overall camera than Samsung.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/iphone › help me understand iphone 17 pro’s lenses, focal lengths and resulting image quality
r/iphone on Reddit: Help me understand iPhone 17 Pro’s lenses, focal lengths and resulting image quality
September 20, 2025 -

From digging around the Internet, I’ve gathered the following assumptions about what impact to photo quality choosing the different lenses has. Please help me understand where I’m correct and not.

For best image quality… Choose the actual 0.5x (13mm equivalent focal length), 1x (24mm), and 4x (100mm) lenses for essentially optical quality results.

For next-to-best quality… Choose 2x (48mm) and 8x (200mm) for cropped digital zoom results that are enhanced with software improvements in the camera’s engine.

For worst-quality… Choose the slider and do not stop at the predetermined values. Is this just digital zoom without software enhancements? Examples: 3x, 5x, 40x, etc.

I’m not sure what happens when you choose the custom 1.2x (28mm) and 1.5x (35mm) in terms of photo quality. Is this just plain digital zoom or is it enhanced with software? It seems odd to me that these options can be turned off in settings, whereas turning the slider to an arbitrary value (or pinch-zooming) cannot be.

Also, where does Macro fit into this? Thanks!

Top answer
1 of 4
6
For best image quality… Choose the actual 0.5x (13mm equivalent focal length), 1x (24mm), and 4x (100mm) lenses for essentially optical quality results. Correct. You have the option of taking these pictures at 12MP, 24MP (default), and 48MP. For next-to-best quality… Choose 2x (48mm) and 8x (200mm) for cropped digital zoom results that are enhanced with software improvements in the camera’s engine. The sensor is a rectangle. That rectangle is subdivided into a bunch of little squares called pixels. For these options, the camera uses groups of pixels to act as one larger pixel. This is how it simulates the longer focal length, and this is also what cases them to lose resolution. These pictures will always be 12MP, but they are still going to look good. For worst-quality… Choose the slider and do not stop at the predetermined values. Is this just digital zoom without software enhancements? Examples: 3x, 5x, 40x, etc. Correct. I wouldn't ever use these. I’m not sure what happens when you choose the custom 1.2x (28mm) and 1.5x (35mm) in terms of photo quality. Exact same thing as with 48mm and 200mm, but it's grouping fewer pixels together so these will be higher resolution. 28mm can be up to 36MP and 35mm can be up to 24MP. Also, where does Macro fit into this? Same thing again. It's cropping in on the sensor and will always be a 12MP picture. These are decent, but nothing like a true dedicated macro lens on a full size camera.
2 of 4
3
Hi guys, are these numbers apply to normal Photos mode only right? What about Portrait mode? Is the sensor and lens used in Portrait mode will be the same at 1x, 2x, 4x?
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/askphotography › iphone 17 pro or point and shoot camera?
r/AskPhotography on Reddit: iPhone 17 pro or point and shoot camera?
September 9, 2025 -

(1) Budget, country, and currency: 300 - 600 USD, USA, USD

(2) What equipment, if any, you have now and why is it no longer meeting your needs? I have an iPhone 11 pro and its camera sucks (specially nowadays where everyone seems to have a nice camera). I really want (and need) a nice camera for one main reason: traveling.

(3) What kinds of subjects do you intend to shoot? So I need a compact camera that fits in my pocket (that’s why the point and shoot) to take pictures of nature, buildings, people, etc.

(4) Is it primarily for photography, videography, or both? Both, but mainly photography

First of all, sorry for the noob question.

Even though the iPhone 17 pro hasn’t been released yet, so we can’t know for sure how it is going to be, we have its specs:

  • All three rear cameras are 48MP Fusion sensors (Main, Ultra Wide, Telephoto).

  • The Telephoto now supports 8x optical zoom (200mm equiv.) and 4x (100mm) with the 48MP sensor.

  • Front: 18MP Center Stage with a square sensor for high-res photos/videos in any orientation, plus ultra-stabilized 4K HDR.

My budget for the camera would be around 300 - 600 usd. I was mainly considering getting an used (but refurbished) Sony rx100 mark I. But if you have any other suggestions, I would gladly accept them.

So the questions are: should I get the new iPhone 17 pro or a point and shoot camera? Which one is going to be able to provide better image quality? Is the rx100 too obsolete? Will Apple be able to kill the compact camera market? It looks like they’re trying, at least.

Top answer
1 of 11
4
These are my thoughts as someone who will never purchase a phone because of the camera: $300-$600 probably won’t buy you even half of an iPhone, if you’re using it as your cell and a camera even the base storage may be too little for you factoring in emails, apps, and text data. I’d ask yourself: what are you going to do with these photos? Post them on Instagram? Try to print them? Or just to look at on a screen? Do you plan to edit them at all? You COULD be looking at a used p+s from eBay, perhaps very simple perhaps lower MP than an iPhone but with the experience of having a separate “real” camera. Something to keep in mind is apples planned obsoletion, it might take 10 years to push out the support for the 17, but buying a modern camera could make your $300-$500 go further time wise
2 of 11
2
As a long time photographer I am ashamed to say this but I think for your use case an iPhone would do the job better than a point and shoot. And it does not need to be an iPhone 17. Even an iPhone 15 pro will do the trick. Here are my reasons: The best camera is the camera that is always readily available, which in this case is a phone. With a separate camera you will need to struggle with downloading photos, editing them, storing them somewhere, and sending them to your phone to be able to share on social media or your friends / family. On an iPhone these are done automatically. Even in Auto mode, no point and shoot will create the same images that an iPhone creates. If you are not too concerned about the slightly unnatural look, iPhone will auto edit your photos to look at their best. Computational photography has come a long way... You do not need to carry another charger for your camera or even think to recharge before use. The phone is a tool you already keep charged on you everyday. What will you be missing if you go with an iPhone? (advantages of point and shoot). * The camera uses a better lens than iPhone, which creates a cleaner image. * Depending on the camera, the sensor size might be bigger (like the 1 inch sensor of Rx100) which will provide a higher dynamic range image with better low light performance. But be careful, most other point and shoot cameras has a tiny sensor similar to an iPhone sensor. * Depending on the camera, you might get e better focal range (better zoom) - which is NOT the case for the Rx100 by the way. So in short, unfortunately, for everyday use, travel etc. dedicated point and shoot cameras have already lost the battle to the phones IMO. Phones are quicker, much easier to use and always available. If you want better photos than the iPhone, the point and shoots is not the way to go. Then consider proper cameras with proper lenses.
🌐
Digital Photography Review
dpreview.com › forums › mobile photography › mobile photography talk
iPhone Pro vs crop sensor | DPReview Forums
October 20, 2025 - ... APSC at F2.8 gathers as much light as FF at F4, and FF is only 60% bigger than APSC. Click to expand... Wrong. FF is around (36 × 24) / (24 × 16) = 1.5² = 2.25× the area of APS-C (i.e., 125% larger). ... The size difference between APSC and 1/1.28 is in excess of 400% lol.