I think there is still room for a jack-of-all-trades DS. There are countless problems where deep learning is not the correct approach and some statistics or lighter-weight ML will do the trick. However, in order to make your solutions available and live, they need to be deployed in an API, app, or static html page. I think 5 years ago, a lot of DS had the mentality "a developer will do that all for me and I'll just develop and hand over a Jupyter notebook." You could get a job with that mentality for a few years. But I don't think this worked out so well - most of those notebooks I saw in my company amounted to nothing, and some of those folks got laid off. The DS who understood some dev ops, Linux, databases, etc. were able to deploy solutions themselves or work more constructively with the developers to develop. The job market may not be so hot for these guys anymore either, but I have to believe it will turn around for them because they'll have a compelling portfolio and route to value creation. Answer from gyp_casino on reddit.com
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › is ds actually dying?
r/datascience on Reddit: Is DS actually dying?
January 6, 2024 -

I’ve heard multiple sentiments from reddit and irl that DS is a dying field, and will be replaced by ML/AI engineering (MLE). I know this is not 100% true, but I am starting to worry. To what extent is this claim accurate?

From where I live, there seems to be a lot more MLE jobs available than DS. Of the few DS jobs, some of the JD asks for a lot more engineering skills like spark, cloud computing and deployment than they asked stats. The remaining DS jobs just seem like a rebrand of a data analyst. A friend of mine who work in a software company that it’s becoming a norm to have a full team of MLE and no DS. Is it true?

I have a background in social science so I have dealt with data analytics and statistics for a fair amount. I am not unfamiliar with programming, and I am learning more about coding everyday. I am not sure if I should focus on getting into DS like my original goal or should I change my focus to get into MLE.

Top answer
1 of 68
393
I think there is still room for a jack-of-all-trades DS. There are countless problems where deep learning is not the correct approach and some statistics or lighter-weight ML will do the trick. However, in order to make your solutions available and live, they need to be deployed in an API, app, or static html page. I think 5 years ago, a lot of DS had the mentality "a developer will do that all for me and I'll just develop and hand over a Jupyter notebook." You could get a job with that mentality for a few years. But I don't think this worked out so well - most of those notebooks I saw in my company amounted to nothing, and some of those folks got laid off. The DS who understood some dev ops, Linux, databases, etc. were able to deploy solutions themselves or work more constructively with the developers to develop. The job market may not be so hot for these guys anymore either, but I have to believe it will turn around for them because they'll have a compelling portfolio and route to value creation.
2 of 68
122
The education DS is a joke, it is a mix of high school statistics and python scripting. The actual career is all over the place. It can be anything from making power point presentation like cake diagrams to machine learning with tensorflow in C++. Dont worry too much about your actual title, worry about your day to day job tasks. My title says data scientist, but I am mainly doing SQL, cyber security and python for modelling and cleansing. And then the real production code is done in C and C++ at my current job.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/askdatascience › is data science really dying?
r/askdatascience on Reddit: Is data science really dying?
September 14, 2025 -

I am studying CS (2nd year) but my passion is for data science, not SWE. I'd like to work with analysing data, writing reports and coding, but it appears this field is sadly stale. Are there any signs it's gonna get better, or should I just change my career plans entirely?

Top answer
1 of 21
13
No but it was simply over saturated. A data scientist is someone with years of research experience in their domain and with a hard grasp on statistical analysis. What most people think of these days is data visualization or similar. If you want to be a data scientist then you should major in stats or applied math. Then go into a domain that interests you and develop deep expertise there. These sorts of folks are very in demand. But BS holders who want to break into data science are a dime a dozen I used to interview candidates for internships and fresh grad roles at my previous company and about half of the general track people had misc degrees - business, marketing, “data analysis”, etc - and wanted to do data science. The best hires we made were stats/math grads. At my current company I’m interviewing candidates for a single DS role and we’re asking for an MS in math/stats minimum. The coding is easy enough to learn. Lack of intuition for what the numbers actually mean is harder to teach. Edit: we hired a couple of Econ majors as well and they were pretty good.
2 of 21
2
I’m a data scientist at a traditional manufacturing company and there is more work for me than I can handle. There is so much more we can be doing with data that is currently stuck in manual spreadsheets. That said, “data scientist” where I work is a catch-all term for “person whose primary job is coding data related things.” A huge part of my job is data engineering. I also deploy models to production pipelines and do automated reports.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › my data science dream is slowly dying
r/datascience on Reddit: My data science dream is slowly dying
June 18, 2025 -

I am currently studying Data Science and really fell in love with the field, but the more i progress the more depressed i become.

Over the past year, after watching job postings especially in tech I’ve realized most Data Scientist roles are basically advanced data analysts, focused on dashboards, metrics, A/B tests. (It is not a bad job dont get me wrong, but it is not the direction i want to take)

The actual ML work seems to be done by ML Engineers, which often requires deep software engineering skills which something I’m not passionate about.

Right now, I feel stuck. I don’t think I’d enjoy spending most of my time on product analytics, but I also don’t see many roles focused on ML unless you’re already a software engineer (not talking about research but training models to solve business problems).

Do you have any advice?

Also will there ever be more space for Data Scientists to work hands on with ML or is that firmly in the engineer’s domain now? I mean which is your idea about the field?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › is the traditional data scientist role dying out?
r/datascience on Reddit: Is the traditional Data Scientist role dying out?
May 22, 2025 -

I've been casually browsing job postings lately just to stay informed about the market, and honestly, I'm starting to wonder if the classic "Data Scientist" position is becoming a thing of the past.

Most of what I'm seeing falls into these categories:

  • Data Analyst/BI roles (lots of SQL, dashboards, basic reporting)

  • Data Engineer positions (pipelines, ETL, infrastructure stuff)

  • AI/ML Engineer jobs (but these seem more about LLMs and deploying models than actually building them)

What I'm not seeing much of anymore is that traditional data scientist role - you know, the one where you actually do statistical modeling, design experiments, and work through complex business problems from start to finish using both programming and solid stats knowledge.

It makes me wonder: are companies just splitting up what used to be one data scientist job into multiple specialized roles? Or has the market just moved on from needing that "unicorn" profile that could do everything?

For those of you currently working as data scientists - what does your actual day-to-day look like? Are you still doing the traditional DS work, or has your role evolved into something more specialized?

And for anyone else who's been keeping an eye on the job market - am I just looking in the wrong places, or are others seeing this same trend?

Just curious about where the field is heading and whether that broad, stats-heavy data scientist role still has a place in today's market.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › data science is losing its soul
r/datascience on Reddit: Data Science is losing its soul
February 15, 2025 -

DS teams are starting to lose the essence that made them truly groundbreaking. their mixed scientific and business core. What we’re seeing now is a shift from deep statistical analysis and business oriented modeling to quick and dirty engineering solutions. Sure, this approach might give us a few immediate wins but it leads to low ROI projects and pulls the field further away from its true potential. One size-fits-all programming just doesn’t work. it’s not the whole game.

Top answer
1 of 5
517
This is mostly caused by the incorrect illusion that LLMs have perfect accuracy in everything At data orgs in small to mid sized companies, importance of offline evaluation and dataset construction is losing ground to throwing autoML pipelines at datasets with heavy sampling bias and LLM workflows with magic prompts that are blindly applied for domain specific tasks etc. I think due to above reason there’s the risk of DS products failing even more often and DS teams may start to get outsourced :(
2 of 5
94
That’s entirely on the DS teams. Don’t like low-accuracy models pushed to prod? Establish benchmarks and thresholds they have to meet. Project doesn’t have enough data to become a model? Offer a business rule instead. No one will give a shit if it’s a model or not. Code is code. As a DS your job- well, your manager’s - is to figure out the deliverable and expected ROI. Not doing enough science? Be prepared to give bad news, a lot. The science we’re not doing is telling the truth about the business. Is it worth investing that much calories into? If you can build improvement plans and test alternatives. Again, dig into the data and find out. Establish the baseline for metrics and then test the shit out process changes that you think will lead to their increase (goes for operations, marketing, hell even existing models). DS hasn’t lost its soul. Some DS teams have. DS can still be that framework to which the business can learn how to improve itself.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/dataanalysis › is data science really a dying field
r/dataanalysis on Reddit: Is data science really a dying field
September 20, 2024 -

Is Data Science Really a Dying Field?

Hey everyone, I've been seeing a lot of talk lately about data science being a "dying field" or reaching a saturation point. As someone who's been working in the industry for a few years now, I wanted to share my thoughts and spark a discussion.

Is there any truth to these claims?

On the one hand, it's true that the initial hype surrounding data science has cooled down. The days of "data scientist" being the sexiest job of the 21st century are probably over. However, I believe this is a natural progression as the field matures.

The demand for data skills is still incredibly high. Companies are generating more data than ever before, and they need people who can analyze it and extract valuable insights. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 22% growth in data science jobs over the next decade, which is much faster than the average for all occupations.

However, the landscape is definitely changing.The days of "jack-of-all-trades" data scientists are fading. Companies are now looking for specialists with deep expertise in specific areas, such as machine learning, natural language processing, or data visualization. Additionally, the barrier to entry is getting lower as more and more educational resources and tools become available.

So, is data science dying? Absolutely not. It's simply evolving. The field is becoming more specialized and competitive, but the opportunities for those with the right skills are still immense.

What do you guys think? Is data science a dying field? What are your thoughts on the future of the industry?

Let's discuss!

P.S. I'm also curious to hear from people who are just starting out in data science. What are your biggest challenges and concerns?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datasciencejobs › is data science going extinct
r/DataScienceJobs on Reddit: Is data science going extinct
January 3, 2026 -

Im an industrial engineer whos gonna graduate by the end of the month. Ive been studying data science from the past 6 months (took ibm data science speciality, jose portilla's udemy course machine learning for data science masterclass, python, sql)

Im currently lost on what steps to take next

I sat down with a data scientist today and tried to ask for advice, he told me he doesnt even think that data science will stay, its gonna be replaced by AI. Especially the machine learning algorithms and classification methods (trees,boosting,etc) they aret being built from scratch anymore

Im totally lost now and dont know what next steps to take and what to learn next. Should i pursue business analysis/data analysis/what courses to take/what skills to learn, and you see how my brain is exploding

Top answer
1 of 5
93
I am a data scientist and an AI Technical Lead at a large corporation, and I am also a data guy of an academic research team. And I can tell you that there is no way that AI could REPLACE either my industrial job or my academic activities... I just use LLMs as a digital assistant, boilerplate code writer, but I overwrite, adjust and instruct LLMs all the time, as well as writing the important (not boilerplate) codes myself, because LLMs are unreliable. I am the one, whom my bosses, my clients and my research fellows trust at the end of the day, so the responsibility remains mine -- and actually this is what they are paying for. (Because otherwise it is true, that they could prompt the LLMs themselves, but they cannot assess, if the model / code / text LLMs propose is a proper one, or full BS; they cannot understand the codes, the methods, cannot judge the full direction is right or wrong etc.). The same with e.g. lawyers. We could assume that LLMs can substitute lawyers, but they cannot.
2 of 5
36
I used to think data science was going extinct. I don’t anymore. Full stop. What’s being automated isn’t thinking really..it’s execution. Models have been commoditized for years. Trees, boosting, neural nets, AutoML… that’s just tooling. The real value was never “building models from scratch.” What is dying is the notebook-only data scientist who trains models without owning decisions. What’s growing is the data scientist who can: Frame messy business problems Decide what should be modeled and why Evaluate tradeoffs (accuracy vs cost, bias vs lift) Translate outputs into decisions people act on AI speeds up work. It doesn’t replace judgment, context, or accountability. Every field goes through this. Compilers didn’t kill programmers. Excel didn’t kill finance. AI won’t kill data science, it just raises the bar. And I’m thankful for that. Undifferentiated data science is dying..Decision-driven data science is not. At the core: Adapt or get filtered out.
Find elsewhere
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/learnmachinelearning › is traditional data science dead?
r/learnmachinelearning on Reddit: Is Traditional Data Science Dead?
April 9, 2026 -

I’ve seen a lot of "doom-posting" lately claiming that AI has automated Data Science into extinction. If you listen to the hype, ingestion is automated, models are AutoML-ed, and inference is just an API call.

As someone in the trenches at a FAANG company, I want to clear the air. Is the "traditional" role dead?

Top answer
1 of 11
62
nah the doom posting is way overblown. been working in marketing analytics for few years now and while yeah some of the basic stuff got automated, there's still tons of work that needs actual human brain automl is great for like standard classification problems but try explaining to your ceo why the model recommended increasing ad spend by 300% in december when you know that's gonna tank roi. or when you need to figure out why your customer lifetime value predictions are completely off for a specific demographic the tools got better but someone still needs to understand the business context, clean the messy data that doesn't fit neat categories, and actually interpret what the results mean. plus most companies are still struggling with basic data infrastructure - they're nowhere near the point where everything is just magical api calls honestly think we're just seeing role evolution rather than extinction. less time on manual feature engineering, more time on understanding what questions to ask and whether the answers actually make sense
2 of 11
21
Traditional data science isn’t dead, but the job is definitely evolving. A lot of the repetitive stuff, such as data cleaning, basic modeling, and boilerplate analysis, has gotten faster or more automated thanks to AI. But the work that actually matters in a real company hasn’t gone anywhere. Someone still has to define the problem, understand the business context, question assumptions, validate data quality, interpret results, and make sure models don’t break in the wild. AutoML can spin up a model, but it can’t tell you whether the metric you’re optimizing is the wrong one or whether the data pipeline is quietly drifting. And it definitely can’t navigate cross‑team politics, communicate tradeoffs, or design experiments that won’t blow up a product launch. So no, the traditional role isn’t dead. The low‑leverage tasks are shrinking, and the strategic, judgment‑heavy parts are becoming even more important.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › is data science field slowly dying?
r/datascience on Reddit: Is data science field slowly dying?
July 16, 2023 -

I was thinking of applying for OMSA but seeing the recent posts on this sub about how people with a lot of experience and credentials can't find jobs anymore makes me doubt my choices. I work as a Data Scientist now, but should I be actively working towards transitioning into software developer roles to have more job security in the future? Or the data science job market is slow now because of the fears of the upcoming recession and will improve in the future?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › can we stop the senseless panic around ds?
Can we stop the senseless panic around DS? : r/datascience
May 27, 2025 - So yes, if you got into DS because ... if there’s still room to practice it meaningfully. Because from where we stand, data science is dying — not in theory, but in practice....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/careerguidance › should i pursue data science in 2026, or is the field at risk because of ai?
r/careerguidance on Reddit: Should I pursue Data Science in 2026, or is the field at risk because of AI?
December 12, 2025 -

Calling all data scientists, ML engineers, AI researchers, and anyone working in the data/AI ecosystem — I’m hoping to get honest insight from people in the field.

I’m currently deciding my career direction, and Data Science has been one of the main areas I’ve been considering. But with the rapid rise of automation, LLMs, and AI-driven tools, I keep hearing discussions about data science roles shrinking or becoming obsolete. This has made me question whether it is still a reliable long-term path.

I want to understand whether Data Science is still worth entering in 2026, or whether the field is becoming too automated for stable career growth. Are companies reducing traditional DS positions, or are the roles simply evolving into something more technical, such as ML engineering, AI engineering, data engineering, or AI-focused product roles?

If the field is changing, I would also appreciate guidance on which skills someone starting in 2026 should prioritize to remain relevant by 2030 and beyond.

I’m also interested in a realistic view of opportunities both in India and abroad. Is Data Science still stable and in demand worldwide, or is the market becoming saturated and uncertain?

Any genuine insight or experience would be extremely helpful as I try to make an informed long-term decision.

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › is studying data science still worth it?
r/datascience on Reddit: Is studying Data Science still worth it?
May 24, 2025 -

Hi everyone, I’m currently studying data science, but I’ve been hearing that the demand for data scientists is decreasing significantly. I’ve also been told that many data scientists are essentially becoming analysts, while the machine learning side of things is increasingly being handled by engineers.

  • Does it still make sense to pursue a career in data science or should i switch to computer science? I mean i dont think i want to do just AB tests for a living

  • Also, are machine learning engineers still building models or are they mostly focused on deploying them?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › data science has become a pseudo-science
r/datascience on Reddit: Data Science Has Become a Pseudo-Science
June 27, 2025 -

I’ve been working in data science for the last ten years, both in industry and academia, having pursued a master’s and PhD in Europe. My experience in the industry, overall, has been very positive. I’ve had the opportunity to work with brilliant people on exciting, high-impact projects. Of course, there were the usual high-stress situations, nonsense PowerPoints, and impossible deadlines, but the work largely felt meaningful.

However, over the past two years or so, it feels like the field has taken a sharp turn. Just yesterday, I attended a technical presentation from the analytics team. The project aimed to identify anomalies in a dataset composed of multiple time series, each containing a clear inflection point. The team’s hypothesis was that these trajectories might indicate entities engaged in some sort of fraud.

The team claimed to have solved the task using “generative AI”. They didn’t go into methodological details but presented results that, according to them, were amazing. Curious, nespecially since the project was heading toward deployment, i asked about validation, performance metrics, or baseline comparisons. None were presented.

Later, I found out that “generative AI” meant asking ChatGPT to generate a code. The code simply computed the mean of each series before and after the inflection point, then calculated the z-score of the difference. No model evaluation. No metrics. No baselines. Absolutely no model criticism. Just a naive approach, packaged and executed very, very quickly under the label of generative AI.

The moment I understood the proposed solution, my immediate thought was "I need to get as far away from this company as possible". I share this anecdote because it summarizes much of what I’ve witnessed in the field over the past two years. It feels like data science is drifting toward a kind of pseudo-science where we consult a black-box oracle for answers, and questioning its outputs is treated as anti-innovation, while no one really understand how the outputs were generated.

After several experiences like this, I’m seriously considering focusing on academia. Working on projects like these is eroding any hope I have in the field. I know this won’t work and yet, the label generative AI seems to make it unquestionable. So I came here to ask if is this experience shared among other DSs?

🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/datascience › data science isn't fun anymore
r/datascience on Reddit: Data Science isn't fun anymore
June 27, 2024 -

I love analyzing data and building models. I was a DA for 8 years and DS for 8 years. A lot of that seems like it's gone. DA is building dashboards and DS is pushing data to an API which spits out a result. All the DS jobs I see are AI focused which is more pushing data to an API. I did the DE part to help me analyze the data. I don't want to be 100% DE.

Any advice?

Edit: I will give example. I just created a forecast using ARIMA. Instead of spending the time to understand the data and select good hyper parameter, I just brute forced it because I have so much compute. This results in a more accurate model than my human brain could devise. Now I just have to productionize it. Zero critical thinking skills required.