There are so many agent frameworks now. I've lost count of them. They will all die in half a year. All of them are just copies or slightly different flavors of the same thing. I don't really see the advantage of using them if they could all disappear or be recreated pretty easily More on reddit.com

I have tried ADK recently and built a sequential agent project. Planning to implement A2A demo with ADK and other agent framework too. So far I'm liking it More on reddit.com

How this is more effective than one agent that have all tools? Why we need to add A2A layer here aside, it's nice and released by Google? More on reddit.com

A really great overview. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Looking at your breakdown I find the decision they made where “everything is an agent” (point 6) is a bit odd. The structural workflow patterns (the ones you mentioned ) as well as the Agent specific workflow patterns would have been better as a simple set of well patterns on top of the Agent core. Not sure I agree about 12. I think there’s much better ways to implement an event based system but I’m biased having built one. What do you like about how they use callbacks. On 4 I’m going back and forth I actually think I like the way they’ve implemented this but again it follows the “everything is an agent” design and I’m not sure about that decision so like I said trying to decide if I like it or not. Why specifically don’t you like the way they implemented 4? I think it’s got a lot of potential as an SDK and is probably one of the stronger offerings already though like you I question some core design decisions. It adds another option in the SDK realm along with OpenAI’s and SmolAgents (which I feel is a hybrid SDK/Framework which makes it an overall stronger starting point). I think if your in the CloudRun/Vertex ecosystem this is definitely a strong offering. If you’re not it’s still a strong offering with room to grow. Love to hear your additional thoughts on my points above. Cheers, Christopher More on reddit.com