My NZXT Z73 CPU temperature says 50 degrees and the AMD Ryzen Master says 40, just wondering which is accurate.

For my Ryzen 5 3600, I was actually able to push 4.6 GHz on all cores with 1.3125 volts as stated in Ryzen Master. So i would like to ask if the program is actually accurate?

Below is a snapshot of my Cinebench run

Is it within a 5 degree margin? Or could it be higher/lower?

Under load while in game and using High Performance for power saving plan, I see it gets to around 48-52c in Ryzen Master.

While if I use the power saving plan, it drops to around 30-32c on idle.

Is this fairly accurate of a reading? I know that's a really decent temperature if true, I assume.

Hello,

I don't really understand why people don't like Ryzen Master, is AMD such a awful developer ?

I'm new to AMD world (X870 Pro RS with 9700X), and I wasn't a crazy overclocker on the intel platform. But when I ears all the troubles made by the Asrock voltage and amperage choices, I just wonder why people don't use Ryzen Master to tweek the BIOS parameters, as it's certainly more accurate and respectfull of what AMD want to see in BIOS settings.

Of course, the first thing to do is to uninstall Ryzen Master if you already have installed it, clear CMOS, default settings, and reinstall Ryzen Master. Then you can try all the PBO and Memory tweek you like, with trying it first without writing in BIOS and then when you are OK with stability, push in BIOS.

the only thing I'm aware of is that Ryzen Master is too optimistic with the CO settings and you have to do your own stability test.

But wouldn't be a good start and a way to bypass strange Asrock choices ?

I have been trying to figure out the temps on my 3700x but that seems to be quite the task since every software I try gives different readings. I have tried Ryzen Master, HWInfo and HW Monitor. Before I try Speccy I thought I'd ask what software is the most accurate an reading temps.

The problem is that Ryzen Master report idle temps at 35-37, HWINfor says its 30-33 and HWMonitor says its 39-41. It gets even crazier under load. In Battlefield V RM says max temp at around 70-73, HWInfo ended on 65 and HWMonitor went all the way up to 80.

I'd like to think RM is the most accurate considering it comes from AMD but I dont like the software since I cant seem to get a log saying what max temp is and when alt tabbing the temp do change a few degrees so I have no chance to get the correct max temp. On the two others it says Max temp so I do not need to alt tab all the time trying to find where the cpu ends up. I have kind of ruled out HWMonitor since the case fans doesnt go up to 100% when HWMonitor report 80 degrees.

So anyone have any idea which software really is the most accurate?

And are there any way to get a log out of RM?

Hello, I got the 3900x yesterday, and I would like some info on the softwares we can trust.

• Motherboard: Asus 570 TUF

• Cooler: Noctua U12A

• I have updated the bios, installed AMD Chipset drivers, and I am using the Ryzen balanced power plan.

• Bios uses default settings, just the ram is clocked to 3200 with the automatic profile.

According to Ryzen Master, I have 35 degree celsius on Windows and 60 in Battlefield V. I have not tried any stress test, and I honestly don't care about them.

Using CPU-Z benchmark tool, the all core boost is 4.15, the single core boost is 4.55

My question is on the idle core clock, and the softwares we can trust.

According to Task Manager, HWInfo, HWMonitor, or CPU-Z, even with 1-3% CPU usage with just Chrome open, the CPU lingers around 3.5-3.8ghz, and sometimes goes past 4ghz.

Instead, at the same time Ryzen Master tells me that 8-9 cores are sleeping and that the Peak Speed of the active cores is below 1ghz most of the time. Peak core voltage is usually around 1.1-1.2.

Should I just rely on Ryzen Master and disregard the info provided by all the other tools? It is honestly strange that the results are so different. Also, I expected a lower voltage on Windows, but maybe I am wrong?