For my Ryzen 5 3600, I was actually able to push 4.6 GHz on all cores with 1.3125 volts as stated in Ryzen Master. So i would like to ask if the program is actually accurate?

Below is a snapshot of my Cinebench run

So I OCed my ryzen 1700 that I got second hand from Craigslist to 4.0 at only 1.225 volts. Is this correct or am I just doing it wrong? I normally see them at 1.3 volts or above. Is this considered a silicon lottery win?

My NZXT Z73 CPU temperature says 50 degrees and the AMD Ryzen Master says 40, just wondering which is accurate.

Hello, I got the 3900x yesterday, and I would like some info on the softwares we can trust.

• Motherboard: Asus 570 TUF

• Cooler: Noctua U12A

• I have updated the bios, installed AMD Chipset drivers, and I am using the Ryzen balanced power plan.

• Bios uses default settings, just the ram is clocked to 3200 with the automatic profile.

According to Ryzen Master, I have 35 degree celsius on Windows and 60 in Battlefield V. I have not tried any stress test, and I honestly don't care about them.

Using CPU-Z benchmark tool, the all core boost is 4.15, the single core boost is 4.55

My question is on the idle core clock, and the softwares we can trust.

According to Task Manager, HWInfo, HWMonitor, or CPU-Z, even with 1-3% CPU usage with just Chrome open, the CPU lingers around 3.5-3.8ghz, and sometimes goes past 4ghz.

Instead, at the same time Ryzen Master tells me that 8-9 cores are sleeping and that the Peak Speed of the active cores is below 1ghz most of the time. Peak core voltage is usually around 1.1-1.2.

Should I just rely on Ryzen Master and disregard the info provided by all the other tools? It is honestly strange that the results are so different. Also, I expected a lower voltage on Windows, but maybe I am wrong?

Is it within a 5 degree margin? Or could it be higher/lower?

Under load while in game and using High Performance for power saving plan, I see it gets to around 48-52c in Ryzen Master.

While if I use the power saving plan, it drops to around 30-32c on idle.

Is this fairly accurate of a reading? I know that's a really decent temperature if true, I assume.

Hey there!

would appreciate the help if anyone knows how accuracy on Ryzen 3900x CPU, speedfan says 43c and ryzen master says 63c, so which basically is the correct tempature of the CPU?

On idle ryzen master shows about 45 degrees and core temps from 50-60. At load they both show around 80.

I take it ryzen master is more accurate?

Hello,

I don't really understand why people don't like Ryzen Master, is AMD such a awful developer ?

I'm new to AMD world (X870 Pro RS with 9700X), and I wasn't a crazy overclocker on the intel platform. But when I ears all the troubles made by the Asrock voltage and amperage choices, I just wonder why people don't use Ryzen Master to tweek the BIOS parameters, as it's certainly more accurate and respectfull of what AMD want to see in BIOS settings.

Of course, the first thing to do is to uninstall Ryzen Master if you already have installed it, clear CMOS, default settings, and reinstall Ryzen Master. Then you can try all the PBO and Memory tweek you like, with trying it first without writing in BIOS and then when you are OK with stability, push in BIOS.

the only thing I'm aware of is that Ryzen Master is too optimistic with the CO settings and you have to do your own stability test.

But wouldn't be a good start and a way to bypass strange Asrock choices ?

On Ryzen master, it displays my temperatures for my CPU to be lower (about 40-50C idle) contrasting that to CPUID HWMonitor showcasing it to be 10C higher (50-60C); is one more accurate than the other?

Now apparently over at MSI_Gaming, someone mentioned not to use HWinfo as it does not display accurate temps and thus should use Ryzen Master.

Now my fan curves are set like

35 & 60c running at 65% 65c running at 80% 70c running at 100%

Now.. Ryzen Master is displaying 45-50c while Steam is downloading in the background. Now fan should run at 65% with this temp. However I hear the fan throttling up and down meaning its bumping to 80% then down to 65%.

Now.. Hwinfo however is showing my temps reaching fluctuating to 65-67 then down to 50s. The fans are throttling according to what HWinFo is showing.

So why is Ryzen Master showing different temps when my fan throttles to different % speed?

EDIT: Seen someone say Ryzen Master “tweaked” to display Average Temps. Kinda useless when youre trying to monitor current temp not average.

Is there anything I need to know if I would attempt at overclocking using this program? Is it good or bad at doing so?

Since my temperature hovering around 98 deg celcius, i'm thinking of undervolting my cpu but i saw someone advising not to download it cuz of the it did to their system, soo rn i'm having a second thought.
lemme know your experience
(sorry for bad english)

I just got the 9800x3d and got everything booted perfect and downloaded Ryzen Master and just enabled Expo. On restart I'm now stuck on 15 mobo error code(memory issues).

I've tried reseating each one, swapping them, used just one in the correct slot, tried using the incorrect slot with both one stick and two. It's still stuck on error 15.

Do I have to tear down my rig and pull the cmos battery from under the heat sink??? I don't exactly have extra ram sitting around to try.

Gigabyte Aorus x-870e Elite, g.skill trident z5 F5-6000J3636F32GX2-TZ5NR 64g (32x2)

Does anyone use Ryzen master, and if so, do you recommend it?

I'd like to explore what I can do with it.

Tittle pretty much says it all. My friend wasn't getting his desired FPS in Warzone so he decided to OC his CPU by selecting OC mode Ryzen Master? Is it okay to run it like this forever?

BIOS for me man, screw Ryzen Master. I punched in what I thought was a harmless change, and hit run test, it said it has to restart Windows to apply...and bricked Windows. Was stuck in a endless loop of Windows isn't stable with Ryzen Masters changes, but Windows wants to start with Ryzen Master changes.

Recently, I found out that I can use my Q Code read out screen on my motherboard to display the CPU temperature if no pressing issues are occurring. This has been very handy as I haven't been able to monitor my CPU without alt tabbing out of games and checking ryzen master when gaming. However, I have noticed some discrepancies between the two. At idle both temps are pretty close, within 1-5 degrees of one another at any given point. However, I wanted to test this under load and ran Cinebench20 and got a fairly large discrepancy. My motherboard was reporting temps of ~70 degrees where Ryzen Master was showing around ~80-83. I am curious which one of these readouts would be more accurate? If it is Ryzen Master, I am unsure if 80 degrees during cinebench is too high. If so, should I try to reseat my CPU?

I have been trying to figure out the temps on my 3700x but that seems to be quite the task since every software I try gives different readings. I have tried Ryzen Master, HWInfo and HW Monitor. Before I try Speccy I thought I'd ask what software is the most accurate an reading temps.

The problem is that Ryzen Master report idle temps at 35-37, HWINfor says its 30-33 and HWMonitor says its 39-41. It gets even crazier under load. In Battlefield V RM says max temp at around 70-73, HWInfo ended on 65 and HWMonitor went all the way up to 80.

I'd like to think RM is the most accurate considering it comes from AMD but I dont like the software since I cant seem to get a log saying what max temp is and when alt tabbing the temp do change a few degrees so I have no chance to get the correct max temp. On the two others it says Max temp so I do not need to alt tab all the time trying to find where the cpu ends up. I have kind of ruled out HWMonitor since the case fans doesnt go up to 100% when HWMonitor report 80 degrees.

So anyone have any idea which software really is the most accurate?

And are there any way to get a log out of RM?