So I have done about 9-12 hours extensive testings.
--
You WILL have to know your max PPT, TDC, EDC else this is just waste of time doing it and you will just be using default values which give you more aggressive under-volt than you might had opted before manually before using this.
Make sure to set those values in bios before moving on else you will just see default values in there no matter if you pick auto oc, or pbo, this was the case at least for me it would not pickup anything else than default values in software until manually set in bios.
So go to bios set values for those and set everything else on auto in PBO menu.
Verify and run a test just to verify settings are applied like on this screenshot, you don't have to run a full test if your settings where not added correct, go back and do it again.
My 5900X can handle these
PPT 185
TDC 125
EDC 170
Screen after completion..
https://i.imgur.com/otgetEQ.png
Video running test being stable for now and screen from HWiNFO just after finished tests.
Setup
5900X B0 Stepping early unit, not first week tho.
Asus x570-I ITX - Bios 4204 with AMD AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.6b
3080 FE
16GB F4-3600C15-8GTZ
SF600
All in a loque ghost s1 case with some vector EK cooling setup on all parts.
All this was done by upgrading to latest bios, resetting bios to make sure no old values was stock and I only touched RAM timings with and dram voltage and PPT, TDC, EDC, PBO scalar x10, overclock 200mhz, rest was injected by ryzen masters into the bios settings after hitting apply.
Overall AMD have done a amazing job with this, even noobs can overclock and undervolt proper now 10/10 AMD clap clap
Do you wish to do it your self grab latest version here
https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/ryzen-master
My 5800x is so crap it bootlooped with whatever new RM injected into the BIOS. It even reset the computer while just browsing after I increased the CO values a touch.
New RM were suggesting between -12 to -23 for most of my cores, and I'm beginning to suspect my best cores can't handle the undervolting. I've now put -15 for all cores except for my best two (left them alone) and it seems to be ok after a couple hours of Elden ring and browsing.
I ran a percore and it just set every core to -30 for my 5800X which it can't do as it just bluescreened within 15min of using Chrome.
AMD should post a video guide with best practices on how to use this feature.
I find it really odd that they just dropped a major feature like this without any proper explanation.
Videos
Had my 5600 for nearly a year, now, and want to have a bit of fun with it. Going to try some CO, but I'm not in a position to use the "manual" methods - how good is the automation routine in Ryzen Master?
Has anybody tried it? Does it come up with stable values? I'm not bothered if it's too conservative - I'd rather it be 90% of the way there, and stable, than split hairs for the last ten percent.
I'm prepared to test with OCCT core cycling, if need be.
Wasn’t aware that there was an auto curve optimizer until now. Testing to see how well it works but the estimated time start to finish is a little over an hour 😐
----Update--- Mobo - Asus X570-i itx CPU - Ryzen 5700G
After waiting for this to finish I ran a Cinebench R23 multicore and got a score of 14385 (don't have a screenshot unfortunately). Following that I enabled PBO within Ryzen Master and waited for the restart. After Ryzen Master relaunched following the restart I ran Cinebench again and received a score of 15211. This was all while boosting to 4.65 on all cores at 1.31 volts. Before the Core Optimization with PBO turned on CPU would boost to 4.6 and almost immediately go to 85c and now it has not gone above 73c after the 10 minute loop within Cinebench. For anyone who has not tried or is skeptical, this utility works, at least for me it has produced measurable results. Note - Ryzen Master was running in the background for both runs so it's as close to apples to apples as possible.
I want to set up Curve for my 5600x, but when I start optimization through RM, then EVERY test for some reason gives me one number (-25) for all cores, even though I chose Per Core, what am I doing wrong? How to force RM to select numbers correctly? Sorry for my English, I'm from Serbia myself.
So first thanks to the few tips on the hardware choices, my terra build worked first time. 7900x, in eco mode, 32gb 6000mhz ram and a 6700x. All expertly built by my 9 year old, it was fun teaching about building computers.
I want to ask about this Ryzen tool that is supposed to automatically curve optimize. My system was stable in eco 105w mode, memory clocked at 6000mhz and the temps are cool - the heat sink cool to touch and ~40oC idle, all nice.
After the optimization finished I had to apply the settings it suggested -36. This made a bsod boot loop immediately after the sign in screen, kmode exception not handled. I had to clear CMOS to get back.
I confess even in my experience of 20+ years I've never really overclocked, I favor stability and don't like to push it if it's fast enough already. As I understand these curve optimizer settings aren't overclocking, but running at peak efficiency.
So what is the problem, the suggested settings are just way off? Do I even need curve optimization? I'm interested in cooler temps without changing the cooling solution and power efficiency.
I also read that we should have done curve optimization with a clear bios, I had eco mode (105w) and expo enabled in the bios?
I see a lot of people talking about ryzen masters curve optimizer but im not sure exactly what it does like does it help performance?