Yeah it pisses me off when I see racing sponsors for these "smaller" tech companies like Crowdstrike and Keeper Security. Because you know that cost millions upon millions to do. And I say smaller, because companies like FedEx with over 500,000 employees is a good example of a larger company with 87,.69 billion in revenue. Compared to Keeper 486 employees with 90.6 million in revenue. I'm not saying FedEx should be spending the money either, but a larger percentage of the general population ship stuff, compared to probably less then 1% of the population using Keeper Security. So FedEx builds brand loyalty and they consider it advertisement. People aren't buying password solutions because they saw it on an F1 car. The general population of everyday users, watching F1, are happy with their Chrome and Edge password manager and do not have any compliance requirements. And it seems like with both Keeper and CS, the cost of this sponsorship is directly passed along to the customer at the full premium, not just a 5% increase per year or something reasonable. The whole idea is counterproductive to customers, any company that pays for Keeper, then has to pass along the cost in their product to their customer, thus increasing pricing of goods, and the only one benefiting is Keeper, so they can sponsor an F1 car. More on reddit.com

I was a security architect for a fortune 100 company that did a password manager replacement back a couple of years ago. I looked at almost all of the password manager options at the time. When it comes to the security design, architecture and implementation of cryptography in the product the only other product that even came close was Proton Pass, and it was still second. I particularly appreciated the 2-tier cryptographic architecture of the vault, which has a master key and individual keys for each record. Which means even if the master key was compromised the each individual record would also have to be cracked - making the vault and records virtually impenetrable. Few other managers does that, but Keeper goes beyond that, though some of the more proprietary stuff I learned and I can't discuss about due to an NDA. Let's just say we picked Keeper. If you are looking for secure and safe storage, look no further. Now each of the "good" password managers all had their quirks and advantages. Some were a little more user friendly, some did a better job at auto-fill, and passkey support is still an emerging technology, but not all PW managers support them. Keeper does. Keeper does a good job in these other areas as well. As with most pw managers the achille's heel (so to speak) is always in the logical access. If someone gained your master password how would the product still protect you? Browser extensions are also a factor in the overall security as a place of potential compromise. Therefore audits and independent pen tests is a must to root out those kinds of problems before an adversary finds them first. Keeper is on top of that. Not all other managers are as aggressive in this way, or transparent about it. Is there other good password managers out there? Sure. But there will always be a tradeoff. The grass is rarely greener on the other side of the fence, and you rarely see that until after you crawl over the fence. Outages are transparent with Keeper, where other PW Managers are more opaque about them. A bonus, in my mind. Some also don't encrypt your whole vault record leaving important information available to a breach, like your login URL and other metadata which isn't protected. Keeper encrypts everything. If you are looking to change products because of a very occasional outage, and you are uncomfortable with enabling offline storage, I would caution you to ensure to look at the competitors closely and carefully. The important stuff about password technologies is mostly not visible. Grab their detail technical docs and their design and architecture documentation should be clear and detailed. Most other managers don't even provide them openly. Also, keep in mind, paid advertisements and YouTube product reviews are rarely objective and very few of them dive into the complexities of the security technologies under the hood - the stuff that makes a real difference in this type of software. If you really want to switch. Sure. Good luck finding something better. And, if you really want something to worry about, follow the whole UK request to Apple to create a crypto backdoor to iCloud, and how that might effect other cryptographic technologies like password managers. Now, THAT is something that keeps me up at night. Ok. I need more coffee. I'm out. Peace. More on reddit.com

I used and administered Keeper at my last job. They're a closed-source, cloud-hosted, vendor-supported and expensive solution. It is very simple to use, but the administration has some odd and unintuitive settings. The browser extensions are annoying and sometimes buggy, but so are basically every solution (I can't fault most devs on this one, not everyone creates a webpage in the same way). The groups settings aren't necessarily hierarchical, despite appearing so, it's a bit odd - but once you figure it out it works well. In-built MFA is good and snappy, and the control over MFA enforcement and timeout is as you'd expect. Overall for an enterprise that doesn't want to self-host, they are a decent solution, but prepare to pay. They will provide training too. More on reddit.com

Keeper price is almost double than the price of other password managers More on reddit.com