Empress Matilda
Holy Roman Empress (1114–1125); claimant to the English throne
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Stephen,_King_of_England
Stephen, King of England - Wikipedia
4 days ago - In the final years of the war, Stephen began to focus on the issue of his family and the succession. He wanted to confirm his eldest son, Eustace, as his successor, although chroniclers recorded that Eustace was infamous for levying heavy taxes and extorting money from those on his lands.
BBC
bbc.co.uk › history › historic_figures › stephen_king.shtml
BBC - History - King Stephen
But Stephen had only nominal control over most of the kingdom and was unable to enforce the law or mediate between warring nobles. He hoped only to secure the succession for his son, Eustace. Matilda's son Henry invaded England in 1153 to claim his royal inheritance. When Eustace died in August, under the Treaty of Wallingford, Stephen agreed that Henry should be his successor.
Videos
15:23
Stephen King reads from Never Flinch - YouTube
r/stephenking on Reddit: Stephen King Performing With Raven and ...
20:48
I Read Stephen King Books for a Week (again) - YouTube
02:28
Stephen King on Writing The Running Man in One Week - YouTube
30:09
The ULTIMATE Stephen King Beginner's Guide - YouTube
21:25
It: Welcome to Derry: Every Major Stephen King Reference & Easter ...
Reddit
reddit.com › r/askhistorians › why has there never been a second king stephen of england?
r/AskHistorians on Reddit: Why has there never been a Second King Stephen of England?
October 29, 2023 -
To my knowledge, Stephen and John are the only two names that have never been re-used by a British King.
I understand John's backstory and the rationale for no King John II.
But why no King Stephen II?
Top answer 1 of 2
296
First, these were not the only such names, unless you only count from the Norman Conquest. But there were kings of England before that. England has has only one Egbert (if we count him), Alfred, Canute, etc. This seems to assume a ‘special’ answer, as though the name were somehow deemed blemished or ‘cursed’. But I think this as false assumption. Why would there have to be? Depending on how you count them, there have been a few dozen kings of England and then Britain and the United Kingdom: 57 kings and 6 queens is one common count, starting at Egbert and excluding Matilda and Lady Jane Grey (and the likes of Philip II or the Young King Henry). We can discount kings within England here. Of these, there have been 11 Edwards, 8 Henrys, 6 Georges, 4 Williams, 3 Charleses, 3 Richards, 2 Jameses, 2 Edmunds, 2 Aethelreds, 2 Harolds, a John, a Stephen, and a number of other Anglo-Saxon names that weren’t reused after the Norman Conquest (Edward was the only one - even Alfred was never reused). Given a cluster of monarchs who like to reuse names like that, it seems quite natural there would be a decay in the frequency and some would just be used once. There doesn’t have to be a special reason or view of a name as ‘cursed’ when there have only been so many kings. This is common across most lists of rulers. Plenty of names common in England for a long stretch of the time were never used as regnal names at all: no Peter, Andrew, Matthew, Robert, Roger, David, Daniel, Alexander, Arthur, Samuel… Some of these were used in Scotland, and some have been middle or alternate and even original names of kings (especially in more recent centuries, it has been common for senior royals to be baptised with several names, and choose one as a regnal name (or, in theory, make one up). Usually this is their most common name, but George VI was known personally as ‘Albert’ or even ‘Bertie’ before choosing his fourth name George as his regnal name. Also, there have been heirs apparent who died before ascending the throne, like Henry VIII’s older brother Arthur (and Arthur has been a popular alternate name in the family for a while the last few generations). That said, the reason some names were used so often was often dynastic, as evidenced by the high number of names in a row, so chosen with proximate ancestors in mind: William II was son of William I, there were three Plantagenet Edwards in a row, several Henrys through the House of Lancaster and then the Tudors who were more a continuation of that than the House of York, the Georges of Hanover, etc. These other names proved popular, so that there wasn’t much room for Stephens. Stephen was the only King of England from the House of Blois, with the line of succession switching to Matilda’s by the Treaty of Wallingford. But in any case, he had no children or grandchildren names Stephen. And that isn’t unusual. There’s a small enough sample that we can go through the individual reasons they may have had, but there is arbitrariness and no systematic way these names are determined. Ultimately only one was named Stephen, and that seems quite normal. And there’s nothing stopping there being a Stephen II or even a John II one day, if the monarchy lasts a few more generations.
2 of 2
1
Welcome to r/AskHistorians . Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed . Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup . We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension , or getting the Weekly Roundup . In the meantime our Twitter , Facebook , and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written! I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Empress_Matilda
Empress Matilda - Wikipedia
4 days ago - Henry returned to England once again at the start of 1153 with a small army, winning the support of some of the major regional barons. Neither side's army was keen to fight, however, and the Church brokered a truce; a permanent peace followed, under which Henry recognised Stephen as king, but became Stephen's adopted son and successor.
Landsurvival
landsurvival.com › schools-wikipedia › wp › s › Stephen_of_England.htm
Stephen of England
Stephen, often referred to in history as Stephen of Blois, (c. 1096 – 25 October 1154), was the last Norman King of England. He reigned from 1135 to 1154 and was succeeded by his cousin Henry II, the first of the Angevin or Plantagenet Kings.
Visit Heritage
visitheritage.co.uk › discover › royal-history › house-of-normandy › king-stephen-stephen-vs-the-empress-matilda
Stephen | House of Normandy | Royal history | Visit Heritage
Died: 10th September 1167, Rouen, France Reign: 8th April 1141-1148 (as Lady of the English, though never as queen) Parents: Henry I and Matilda of Scotland Predecessor: Stephen of Blois (cousin) Successor: Stephen of Blois (cousin) Spouse: Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor (1114-1125) and then Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou (1128-1151) Children: Henry II, Geoffrey Count of Nantes, William Fitzempress Royal House: Normandy
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
homepages.rpi.edu › ~holmes › Hobbies › Genealogy2 › ps08 › ps08_033.htm
Stephen of Blois King of England
Stephen was knighted by his uncle, Henry I; was King 1135-54 although the crown was disputed by Empress Matilda and her English partisans--in 1153 he acknowledged her son Henry as his successor. He was a generous patron of religious foundations and a warrier of courage.
Royal Family
royal.uk › stephen-and-matilda
Stephen and Matilda (r. 1135-1154) | The Royal Family
Stephen fought stubbornly against Henry; Stephen even attempted to ensure his son Eustace's succession by having him crowned in 1152 in his own lifetime. The Church refused (having quarrelled with the king some years previously); Eustace's death later in 1153 helped lead to a negotiated peace (the treaty of Wallingford) under which Henry would inherit the throne after Stephen's death.
Kings & Castles
kingsandcastles.uk › monarchs › stephen-of-blois
King Stephen, King of England | Stephen of Blois - Kings & Castles
February 20, 2025 - When King Henry I died in 1135, Stephen and Matilda argued over who would become the ruler of England. Many English nobles were reluctant to accept a woman ruler, and Henry’s Norman subjects resented Matilda’s marriage into an Angevin family (the Normans and the Angevins were enemies). Many of Henry’s barons broke their vows and chose Stephen as Henry’s successor...